October 02, 2014, 02:36:09 AM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - tron

Pages: 1 ... 80 81 [82] 83 84 ... 123
1216
I have used HDEW and while they may import from HK or wherever you have no risk of import duty ( as they are UK based ) and they bolt on a three year warranty.  It may not be a full Canon warranty but I have had cause to rely on it with an earlier purchase and the camera was repaired quickly, no quibbles and well by what looks to be a reputable repair shop in Glasgow.  So only one experience but one satisfied customer here ( £2000 for a 5D III not too bad )

Hi Chasn

I'd be interested to know the name of that repair shop?
If you don't want to broadcast it please PM me

Regards
hello, 

I am  interested in learning this information too since I bought my 5D3 from HDEW.

1217
Lenses / Re: EF 24-70 f/4L IS & EF 35 f/2 IS
« on: November 07, 2012, 08:30:19 AM »
What the point of having a 24-70 4L IS AND 24-105 4L IS in the line-up? Isn't it a no-brainer to just get the 105?
Wouldn't be a no-brainer thinking the 24-70 f/4 would have better optic quality than an older lens?  Sorry if I sound sarcastic, but it is the truth.  And most people wouldn't need the extra reach.

Who are 'most people'?  Maybe you. Not me.
+1 for the extra reach comment. I for one do need the reach. Plus we do not know the IQ of the new lens. While I believe it will be really good I am not sure about quality control. So let's not play Canon representatives. If the new lens is really good, buyers will say so. Not fans who haven't bought it.

1218
Lenses / Re: Canon Announces New Lens Caps!
« on: November 07, 2012, 08:22:55 AM »
The old caps are gonna be expensive in the second-hand market  ;D

1219
Lenses / Re: Hold out for EF 35/2 IS or jump in with classic 35 1.4L
« on: November 06, 2012, 12:10:31 PM »
35 f/2 at 900 is a complete waste of money. Get the 35 1.4L before they replace it with a $2K lens...

1220
Lenses / Re: Canon Announces New Lens Caps!
« on: November 06, 2012, 12:07:27 PM »
24-70 f/4L IS, 35 f/22 IS and now these caps. Oh no! Canon worked so hard. We will not see the lenses we so desire in this decade....  ::)

1221
Lenses / Re: Canon Announces New Lens Caps!
« on: November 06, 2012, 12:06:00 PM »
Now I can think that they introduced them to match these old 5DMkIIIs which had problem metering with their lens cap on  ;D

1222
Lenses / Re: Canon Announces New Lens Caps!
« on: November 06, 2012, 12:01:42 PM »
Following on with Canon's recent trend, they will cost only slightly more than a lens hood, say ~$52 each.   :o
;D

1223
Lenses / Re: EF 24-70 f/4L IS & EF 35 f/2 IS
« on: November 06, 2012, 11:57:47 AM »
I remember everyone thought I was crazy for calling the 24-70 f4L DOA.

Well, for 1500$ I consider that DOA.

And I had agreed with you.

http://www.canonrumors.com/forum/index.php?topic=10597.msg189704#msg189704

Unfortunatelly I was wrong about this rumor being CR0  :(

It seems that Canon spends valuable resources for nonsense...

1224
Lenses / Re: EF 24-70 f/4L IS & EF 35 f/2 IS
« on: November 05, 2012, 10:07:12 PM »
both lenses are completely off the mark.

35/2.0 is in need of a successor, but like the current one it should really have been a low-cost, decent IQ lens, rather than unnecessary IS at the price of an L lens.  A modern 50/1.4 Mk. II  with IQ at least equivalent to the Nikon AF-S 50/1.4 at the same price would have been far more urgent.
+1
24-70 is a total mess. Ridiculous that the 2.8 did not come with IS on top of the excellent IQ.
Instead of the 14-70/4 Canon should have improved the 24-105 and extended it to 24-120/4.0 IS - with better IQ than Nikon but at the same price.
+1
I agree on both. Canon is missing the obvious.

I beg to differ, Canon is following the money -> HD video DSLR + Lens sales. Just wait and see, the 6D will easily outsell the 1DX + 5D3 combined (obviously cheaper camera aimed at the masses), but Canon have done their homework on this, travel photographers like to shoot full-HD video to show to the folks back home, as well as taking stills. Moms + Dads love to shoot HD video of their kids playing sports etc. as well as taking photos, which explains why Canon have included similar AF-tracking in the 6D as the new 5D3. How many CR contributors justify expensive kit on the grounds that they can shoot their kids as well? (Just look at how many 50 1.2L shots are of Photogs progeny)

Canon has pandered too long to the specialist stills photographers, how about the hundreds of thousands of Amateur & Indie videographers who purchased the 5D mk II and made it the success story that it is, plus the millions of buyers who continue to flock to Rebel T2i/T3i/T4i and so on, so they can shoot 1080p @ 24 frames per second and post their cinematic style offerings on YouTube or Vimeo.

Canon is finally moving in the right direction - Video. Let Nikon slash prices and lose profits on high-MP DSLR bodies that have always lagged Canon in the video stakes (remember the Nikon D300s with 720p video vs Canon 7D with 1080p, then the Nikon D7000 had 1080p movie recording but no dedicated Movie button like the 7D). Canon is not just following video/still photography trends, they're shaping them.

Videographers need IS not ISO 25,600 ;)
You know 24-105 has IS too. Even if it is a 3-stop IS the extra focal length is much more important. Unless the parents you mentioned are not interesting in focal lengths greater than 70.

1225
Lenses / Re: Waiting for 100~400mm f/4~5.6 IS II.
« on: November 05, 2012, 10:03:42 PM »
... still hoping the 400 f/5.6 L IS gets replaced by a 500 f/5.6 L IS ...
Boo hoo I want one too  :-[

glad to see I'm not the only one!
Yes! As many of us who want a rather big white L telephoto that does not cost a 5 digit amount  ::)

1226
1D X Sample Images / Re: NYC a day after Sandy-
« on: November 05, 2012, 10:00:20 PM »
Maybe next time he should use a fast prime ;)
+1 I was about to comment on that when I saw your comment. The 24-70 2.8 II is not the end all be all lens. But I agree the picture is superb  8)

1227
Thanks for the info Ray
Maybe the tape from the light leak fix is interfering with AF assist  :o :o
;D  ;D  ;D

1228
Lenses / Re: Waiting for 100~400mm f/4~5.6 IS II.
« on: November 05, 2012, 08:22:49 PM »
... still hoping the 400 f/5.6 L IS gets replaced by a 500 f/5.6 L IS ...
Boo hoo I want one too  :-[

1229
Lenses / Re: EF 24-70 f/4L IS & EF 35 f/2 IS
« on: November 05, 2012, 08:11:55 PM »
both lenses are completely off the mark.

35/2.0 is in need of a successor, but like the current one it should really have been a low-cost, decent IQ lens, rather than unnecessary IS at the price of an L lens.  A modern 50/1.4 Mk. II  with IQ at least equivalent to the Nikon AF-S 50/1.4 at the same price would have been far more urgent.
+1
24-70 is a total mess. Ridiculous that the 2.8 did not come with IS on top of the excellent IQ.
Instead of the 14-70/4 Canon should have improved the 24-105 and extended it to 24-120/4.0 IS - with better IQ than Nikon but at the same price.
+1
I agree on both. Canon is missing the obvious.

1230
Lenses / Re: Two Lenses to be Announced Shortly.....
« on: November 05, 2012, 02:28:17 PM »
The current 50mm f/1.4 needs improved build quality, not IS.
I thought it needed improved Image Quality wide open...

Pages: 1 ... 80 81 [82] 83 84 ... 123