August 21, 2014, 06:18:40 PM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - tron

Pages: 1 ... 82 83 [84] 85 86 ... 121
1246
Lenses / Re: Canon EF 24-70 f/4L IS Coming [CR3]
« on: October 30, 2012, 07:03:15 PM »
D.O.A I couldn't agree more. Unless this is a CR0 rumor actually  ::) 

1247
Third Party Manufacturers / Re: Patent: Tamron 150-600 f/5-6.3
« on: October 29, 2012, 02:38:36 PM »
A fixed focal length of 600mm and (preferably) f/5.6 would be a much better choice and it would be a little easier I guess to achieve good optical quality. YMMV.

1248
Lenses / Re: Canon EF 24-70 f/2.8L IS [CR1]
« on: October 29, 2012, 11:59:02 AM »
For me, it would have to be lower than the cost of the 70-200/2.8L IS II, which is a bigger lens, with bigger elements, spectacular optics, and IS.  To get there, they'd likely have to reduce the cost of the II non IS.
+1

1249
Lenses / Re: What lens should I use at my first Fashion Show?
« on: October 29, 2012, 09:44:16 AM »
Just noticed now... Why is it your focus is better and a lot sharper when the model doesn't wear anything except paint? :D
The zoom lens got excited  ;D

1250
Lenses / Re: Guesses on lenses for Photoplus
« on: October 29, 2012, 09:37:07 AM »
We'll know this for sure within a few days (hours?) but I thought I would take a stab at what lenses they'll announce.

Most likely
35mm 1.4 II - priced somewhere between $1700-$2100
200-400/1.4x - priced at $10k

Possibilities
TS-E 90 II - magnification near .5x, similar updates to other TS lenses, priced at $2100
TS-E 45 II - similar updates to other TS lenses, priced at $2100
400/5.6 II - much sharper.  Has new gen IS.  Priced at $2300.
300/4 II - much sharper, takes extenders better. Has new gen IS.  Priced at $2300

Unlikely
100-400 II - no more push/pull, much sharper and faster.  Priced at $3000.
135/2 II - Priced at $1900.
MP-E 65 II - Significantly better optics, maybe increased magnification.  Priced at $2300.

Not happening
14-24 - Maybe an "in development" announcement, which means 2014

Ok, so it's 10/28 and Photoplus is over.  What new lenses were announced?   :o

And where is the new 46mp camera and the 7D II

Well all these seemed more like a wish list anyway and nothing more...

1251
EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: Projection question
« on: October 29, 2012, 09:34:10 AM »
Do you have complains from all 3 lenses you mentioned? If I were to guess I would say that the 70-300 DO is the worst of the three.  The other 2 lenses have a reputation of being very good (I used to have 10-22 until it was stolen). Do you use them at optimum apertures?

1252
Pricewatch Deals / Re: The 5D Mark II & 5D Mark III Get Cheaper
« on: October 29, 2012, 07:49:26 AM »
So, buying cameras as an investment... how is that working out for all of those that bought the 5D3 already?
Well that depends.

 I bought a 5D3 (but paid in Europe 2700 instead of the usual 3000-3500). It wasn't exactly an investment. I bought it to have a second body (OK my 5D2 became my second body...). Prices in Europe do not drop so fast  :( so waiting a lot does not have so many advantages.

Now, If someone is a pro who has used 5D3 a lot these months then it was worth the money.

1253
Third Party Manufacturers / Re: Rokinon 14mm f/2.8
« on: October 29, 2012, 07:34:54 AM »
Number 2 first, I found one I believe in here:  http://www.adobe.com/products/photoshop/extend.displayTab2.html#resources  In the profile downloader area.  There was just one for the lens.  In the profile list I think it was listed as canon and not samyang/rokinon/etc.  Works great to remove the crazy distortion.   There so much resolution everything is still highly sharp after the correction. 

I haven't tried the Milky Way yet as the real good parts aren't high up now.  I wonder how well it will work as there is a lot of vignetting and light loss at F2.8.  May not matter given the brighter parts of the Milky Way get put in the middle.  It just has a way of not feeling like F2.8 I guess. 

Edge to edge is pretty sharp at F2.8 infinity.  It doesn't seem you even gain much more sharpness by stopping down than from where it starts at.  But I haven't used this lens all that much yet.  And my new/used 5D II also has a flange to sensor plane difference that needs fixed, but even on that it's good to go.

Can you please get a picture of the night sky with the lens fully open and see how the stars show at the corners? If the lens has coma (which even Canon L lenses have fully open) they will look like ... seagulls!

1254
Software & Accessories / Re: Graduated Neutral Density Filters
« on: October 28, 2012, 10:37:50 PM »
well i just may have to save up a little bit longer then for this since the general figures seem to point towards Lee system.. also something else i would like to clear up is i do plan to move to full frame eventually so it is something i would want to be compatible (doesn't vignette really) whenever that maybe.. the holders are slightly confusing to me.. so can you basically buy a holder then as many adapter rings as you want to fit different size filter threads of your various lenses? or are certain holders only compatible with certain rings?

Check this:  http://www.leefilters.com/index.php/camera/system

Generally you will get the filter holder and adapter rings. You need at least the 77mm wide angle version (there  are 2 versions standard and wide-angle, make sure you get the latter).

The filters will be 4X6 inches (10X15cm). There are 1,2,3 stop ND filters soft or hard.

1255
EOS Bodies / Re: Canon to start using 0.18um (180nm) process for FF?
« on: October 28, 2012, 09:11:49 PM »
I don't expect the 7DII to have the same relationship to the 5DIII as the 7D did to the 5DII - a lot of people who could not afford a 1DIV bought a 5DII and 7D.
Now, if -and that's a big IF- 7DII uses the new technology sensors and an AF system that is between the 7D's and 5D3's (hopefully 5D3's) then I cannot think why it couldn't be the new wildlife camera. An 18Mpixel APS-C sensor with a quality close to 5D3's would kill... Of course this would cannibalize the 1DX and the new super telephotos sales

1256
Software & Accessories / Re: Graduated Neutral Density Filters
« on: October 28, 2012, 04:31:59 PM »
Some more clarifications. With Cokin P the 16-35 may vignette. I use the Lee filter holder for 4x6 inch filters.
The equivalent in Cokin is not the P but the  Z-Pro holder.

1257
Software & Accessories / Re: Graduated Neutral Density Filters
« on: October 28, 2012, 04:25:28 PM »
I remember though that not all ND graduate filters are pure gray. 

1258
Software & Accessories / Re: Graduated Neutral Density Filters
« on: October 28, 2012, 04:23:46 PM »
I have the Lee set so I was able to comment on it. I do not have the Cokin P set with graduate filters so as to make a comparison.

1259
Software & Accessories / Re: Graduated Neutral Density Filters
« on: October 28, 2012, 04:19:22 PM »
I just saw your budget. I am afraid that my recommendation will cost more...

1260
Software & Accessories / Re: Graduated Neutral Density Filters
« on: October 28, 2012, 04:04:22 PM »
Check the Lee Filter System. Judging by your signature in addition to the filter holder you will need a 77mm filter thread adapter too (both 70-200 2.8 IS II and 16-35 version 1 have a 77mm filter thread)
Just make sure you select the Wide-angle 77mm adaptor.

As to the specific filters I would suggest that you get both a 2-stop soft ND and a 3-stop ND filters.

Pages: 1 ... 82 83 [84] 85 86 ... 121