« on: July 20, 2013, 06:28:46 PM »
The tripod head seems a very simply/cheap one and the lens seems an APS-C zoom...
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
There was a time when I used to shoot with the 400L f/5.6 ... The most comments I used to get were ... Can you still buy these new? and the old faithful ... why this lens, this dodo doesn't even ZOOM!Hmmm, they must be dodo themselves!
How about dual CF cards ?- dual and FAST SD cards (get rid of this expensive stupid and outdated CF junk)
Allow me to politely disagree. If a 5D4 would come with SD card slots only, I would avoid it for that single reason, regardless of anything else.
Sorry for a lame "me too" post... But yeah, me too.
Voted: 2 stops of improved and usable ISO performance (low light capabilities). Others are not important to me.Me too
And, back to our regularly scheduled programming:+1 FINALLY ON TOPIC
How about those ML guys, eh! Thanks to all the ML guys for figuring this out and giving us an additional option, for those who find the need for it.
Relax! I meant that it is not available yet (irrespective of firmware level)Until a fully featured ML version is compiled and distributed for 5D3 (with 1.2.1 firmware) it is purely theoretical...So you mean to tell me that this isn't practical without being able to use it with 1.2.1 firmware?
Well I must say as a 1.1.3 user, I appreciate and make use of their hard work on a day to day basis. So I could care less about being able to record through hdmi a horrible 1080 picture on another $800 device that is sold seperately.
What I'm looking at...
(sell 60D, 10-22, 70-200, keep 50 b/c why the hell not?)
5D III (toying with the 1D IV for build and speed but perhaps as a second body next year?)
5D III would be my choice! (In fact I do have it and I have not regretted it)
16-35 II (traveling, street, some landscape, group or environmental portraits even)
OK direct replacement of 10-22
70-200 2.8 IS II (everything...weddings, events, portrait, some closer wildlife)
Not so fast. You are coming from a lightweight set. Have you tried 70-200 2.8 IS II? It is heavy!
Plus, your 70-200 is an EXCELLENT lens.
135L (covers my portraits, some street stuff, events/stage stuff)
OK THIS IS PERFECT!
24 1.4L (not as good as the TS but it's more versatile. churches, markets, lowlight, astro)
As you said not so good as the TS. You can forget it for astro. It has HUGE coma!
+1 I do have a 35L 1.4 and I am not selling it. I am not interested in Sigma/Tokina/Tamron/etc...Plenty of people are actually selling their 35L copies to purchase the new 35mm Sigma.Where did you get this information?
Always pronounced it 'Nick-On' not nigh-con or knee-con. Don't really care if I'm right.Same here