October 02, 2014, 05:33:05 AM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - tron

Pages: 1 ... 58 59 [60] 61 62 ... 123
886
Reviews / Re: what utter crap this is.... samyang 24mm TS
« on: June 04, 2013, 11:37:31 AM »
Let me get this right.
A $1k lens is not as sharp as a $2k lens... and you're spitting mad? Have you never thought that (usually) you pay for what you get? Quite often, you pay a lot more.

I think people are always upset when their expectations aren't met.  Samyang has released several lenses that are optically very good, and at a bargain price.   This lens appears to be neither.

+1.  Before it was released, a lot of people were hoping that it would approach the TS-E 24L II in performance.  Now it seems like the discussion is turning to comparing how it does versus TS-E 24L (version I), which is similar in price used...
Exactly:

http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/ISO-12233-Sample-Crops.aspx?Lens=347&Camera=453&Sample=0&FLI=0&API=0&LensComp=841&CameraComp=453&SampleComp=0&FLIComp=0&APIComp=0


The $1K 24mm TS  Samyang lens is worse than ... the $1K 24mm TS Canon lens!

887
Canon EF Prime Lenses / Re: Canon EF135mm f/2L USM
« on: June 03, 2013, 09:46:38 AM »
I do not have anything longer 200mm ;)
Dylan!!!  THIS IS SERIOUS!

I suggest a therapy with a 500mm f/4L IS II ASAP!

888
Lenses / Re: Tele for backpacking
« on: June 03, 2013, 05:23:37 AM »
Also consider the 70-300 L.
+1 I remember missing it last year when I was using 70-200 f/4L IS. My small backpack was full mostly with wide angle lenses so my 300mm f/4L had stayed back in my room.

However the reverse use of the focus and zoom rings in 70-300 puts me off  :(

889
Third Party Manufacturers / Re: Thoughts on Zeiss Canon 5 lens kit?
« on: June 01, 2013, 10:12:15 PM »

I have the 21mm 2.8 ZE and it is excellent. If I were to buy a second one I would get the 25mm f/2.0


See I find this comment interesting.
Wouldn't you find the 21 & 25 to be too close to be worth the cost of having both?
the f/2 would come handy for landscape astrophotography which interests me.
Canon's 24mm 1.4L II exhibits terrible coma and Samyang/Bower/Rokinon 24mm 1.4 is reported to have quality control issues (mainly decentering)

890
Third Party Manufacturers / Re: Thoughts on Zeiss Canon 5 lens kit?
« on: May 31, 2013, 03:23:01 PM »
A mere case is not worth it!   Buy them one by one and choose the ones you really want.

I have the 21mm 2.8 ZE and it is excellent. If I were to buy a second one I would get the 25mm f/2.0

I do not believe in 85mm since it is not easy to focus manually, plus: It has been reported to have focus shift.

891
Lenses / Re: Zeiss 15 vs Canon 14
« on: May 29, 2013, 07:19:48 AM »
What is your intended output?

I know a world leading (in his field) pro photographer and his primary lens is the Sigma 12-24, he absolutely swears by it.

I have the 17 and it is without equal in the ultra wide stakes, even if the Zeiss is fractionally "sharper" the additional functionality of the TS-E make it a far more accomplished lens.
I would get the TS-17 (Actually I do have it!)

As you said it has no equal. Period!

892
Lenses / Re: Zeiss 100 f/2 vs. Canon 85 f/1.2 II vs. Canon 135 f/2
« on: May 29, 2013, 07:17:15 AM »
I was going to recommend the 135L, but the Zeiss is a great piece of glass.  100mm also is also closer to your 35mm.  As somebody else pointed out, the gap between 35 and 135 is a big one.

+1
Every 2x in focal length results in 4x FoV. You can fit four 70mm lens frames inside one 35mm lens frame (sh :)ot from the same distance) and almost sixteen 135mm lens frames inside one 35mm lens frame.
No matter how good the Zeiss 100mm is, the Canon 135mm f/2L has great IQ AND it can autofocus which is a great plus for that focal length (until your subjects sit still).

Plus, one could get a 135mm f/2L and a 85 1/.8 (which is a very decent lens) for the price of Zeiss.

Keep in mind that the above come from someone who swears by his Zeiss Distagon 21mm 2.8.
However, I also have the above 2 mentioned Canon lenses and I am very happy with them  :)

893
EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: 6D vs. 600D with good lenses?
« on: May 28, 2013, 06:57:16 AM »
It would be 6D and 24-105 for me. No dilemma!

If you go FF you will have no need to upgrade to FF later. You can built upon this system.

894
Canon General / Re: Desired fantasy gear
« on: May 28, 2013, 06:35:25 AM »
EF500mm f/5.6L IS DO (But with quality rivaling that of EF500mm f/4 L II)

One can only dream  ;D

895
Canon General / Re: Canon direct mail marketing
« on: May 26, 2013, 03:22:30 PM »
I don't agree they sent a useless brochure. If I recall correctly you have 2 daughters, so the 2 Rebels - which by the way are of different size - would suit them both!
(OK may be in a few years)
 ;D   ;D   ;D

896
Canon General / Re: Desired fantasy gear
« on: May 26, 2013, 03:17:46 PM »
I'd like to see an affordable F4 super-telephoto from Canon.....well we are talking fantasy arn't we?
YES! And light too  ;D

897
EOS Bodies / Re: Make yourself happy
« on: May 24, 2013, 12:17:11 PM »
.
Tempting, but I'm waiting for the SL1X.

I expect rumors should be popping any day now.
Hmmm, you'll wait!

SL1MkII
SL1MkIII
SL1MkIV
SL1X

 ;D  ;D  ;D

898
Lenses / Re: When is the New 100-400 Coming?
« on: May 22, 2013, 12:33:22 PM »
wasn't this supposed to be out last year?  the year before?  the year before?  the year before?  the year before?

lol
Nooooo, it is supposed to come the next year, or the year after it, or 2 years after the next year, or ...   ;D

899
EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: 1DX, 6D and 5D3 RAW files
« on: May 20, 2013, 08:46:00 PM »
May I take advantage of this thread - instead of opening a very similar one - and ask to include EOS 6D in  the equation.

Can someone comment on its raw files too (in relation to 1Dx and 5D3 raw files) ?

Thanks.

900
EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: F/8 Autofocusing impressions
« on: May 20, 2013, 02:12:13 PM »
That's the problem with 3rd party manufacturers.

I'd say this is the problem with *2nd* party manufacturers (I guess the 1st party is us, the customers) - it would be no surprise if Canon, Nikon or whatever changes specs and didn't open their protocols just to +1 their own equipment. Luckily, the 3rd party just got smarter and Sigma now has an usb dock for lens fw updates...
That's a very welcome addition! Let the (lens manufacturers) competition begin  :)

Pages: 1 ... 58 59 [60] 61 62 ... 123