October 02, 2014, 05:30:49 AM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Crapking

Pages: 1 ... 14 15 [16] 17 18 ... 23
226

Who needs the facts when we have so many learned opinionators ??

I think you missed the part where all those facts he listed are the same exact facts that we also listed and it is those facts where the problems lie.

Maybe I am mis-reading it then, but it seems the only time this 'minimum shutter speed limit' kicks in is in P or Av mode. While I see Neuro's and jrista's point, to me this seems to be just another small way to distinguish the 1 and 5 series, which should not be unexpected given the price differential.

227
From the horses mou...erm, manuals...pages:



Pg. 56:
Auto ISO Range: Minimum 100; Maximum 12800



Pg. 125:
ISO Auto

If the ISO speed is set to "A" (Auto), the actual ISO speed to be set will be displayed when you press the shutter button halfway. As indicated below, the ISO speed will be set automatically to suit the shooting mode:

Shooting ModeISO Speed Setting
A+Automatically set within ISO 100 - 12800
P/ Tv/ Av/ MAutomatically set within ISO 100 - 26500 *1
BFixed at ISO 400 *1
With flashFixed at ISO 400 *1 *2 *3

*1: The actual ISO speed range depends on the [Minimum] and [Maximum] settings set in [Auto ISO Range].
*2: If fill flash will result in overexposure, ISO 100 or a higher ISO will be set.
*3: When using bounce flash with an external Speedlite in the <A+> and <P> modes, the ISO speed will automatically be set to ISO 400 - 1600.



As I get page 125, notes 1 and 2 indicate ISO will be set automatically within the full range, or if you have set Auto ISO Range limitations...within the range you have selected. In the case of bounce flash, it defaults to ISO 400 for third-party flashes, defaults to an ISO range of 400-1600 when using canon-brand Speedlight external flash, and WILL automatically select any ISO from 100 on if the camera metering decides the scene will over-expose.

From all that, it appears "Auto ISO" is pretty much indeed COMPLETELY automatic within the FULL RANGE of possible native ISO settings. The only case that seems limited outside of the context of exposure issues is Auto ISO + Flash when using a third party (i.e. non-Speedlite) brand.


Who needs the facts when we have so many learned opinionators ??

228
EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: 5D Mk. III user manual download -where?
« on: March 15, 2012, 11:45:52 AM »
Here's a mirror.

http://wtrns.fr/B7n5jBl1ESx78k

Should be up for the next two weeks.

+3 in Honor of the Mark 3 !!!

229
EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: 5D Mark 3 Queue @ B&H
« on: March 15, 2012, 09:05:28 AM »
Uh oh, I am looking at my email confirmations from B & H for both the 5d3 and 1Dx, there does seem to be a difference between backordered and pre-ordered status, so those with 'backordered' 5d3's may be waiting longer than those with 'pre-ordered' status.   :(

Screen shots cut/pasted from my B&H emails...


Canon CAE5D3
EOS 5D Mark III Digital Camera (Body Only)
Back-ordered   

Canon CAE1DX
EOS-1D X Digital SLR Camera (Body Only)
Pre order. Released in limited qty

230
Software & Accessories / Re: Black Rapid Straps...
« on: March 14, 2012, 07:18:47 AM »
http://www.blackrapid.com/product/hardware/fr-t1/


too bad you missed a previous thread where we discussed just this.....



This adapter (thanks Neuro) has now been added to all my adapters.

231
EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: 5D Mark 3 Queue @ B&H
« on: March 13, 2012, 05:56:23 PM »
I re-checked but no 'second' posting of charges yet - only the initial 'hold' with prompt cancellation of the hold.
My original email time was 12:28 AM, 3/2, and mine also states 'backordered' but the customer service rep told me they all say that.

232
Software & Accessories / WFT-E2 IIa suggestions
« on: March 13, 2012, 02:00:52 PM »
Am going to evaluate the 'old' WFT- E2 IIa next weekend with my 1dIV and before connecting  to my Mac Pro or MacBook Pro wanted to get forum feedback on pitfalls / mistakes to avoid.
My plan is to use my ATT wireless 4G card to allow the camera to send images to either my laptop or maybe my desktop (27" display).  What are people's experiences with wifi networks / transfer times (RAW vs JPEG), etc.  I am planning on displaying photos from an indoor volleyball tournament (to then print/sell), but have not used this hardware before.  Previously I would swap out cards and my assistant would run a slideshow to generate sales, but through CPS I am going to try to go wireless / cardless. 
What problems can I expect??

233
EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: 5D Mark 3 Queue @ B&H
« on: March 12, 2012, 07:19:28 PM »
Followed up with B & H today - they acknowledged they do a credit hold x 48 hrs then reverse the charge.  They did not cancel the order  :), but they would not let me know where I was in the pre-order line, nor when they expected to ship  :(

234
EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: 5D Mark 3 Queue @ B&H
« on: March 10, 2012, 09:59:10 AM »
Got my initial order in very quickly RIGHT after announcement (backorder NOT pre-order screen) and I received a confirmation email AND an email with billing info, AND my CC was actually charged.   
When I looked at my CC statement this week, I saw the original bill posted,BUT a few lines later, I also saw a "credit" reversing the original charge ???   Tried to reach B&H to see what's up, but they are closed today.  Have ordered a few other things from them in the past, but never a pre-order (backorder) item like this. 
Should I be more worried than everyone else ??

235
Sports / Re: AI Servo Question
« on: March 03, 2012, 03:40:13 PM »
http://learn.usa.canon.com/resources/articles/2011/backbutton_af_article.shtml?categoryId=121

Try reading this simple explanation of how to best use the back button AF - very helpful.

236
Lenses / Re: 70-200 f/2.8 IS L II -VS- 135 f/2 L + 70-200 f/4 IS L
« on: March 01, 2012, 05:27:31 PM »
200mm and bokeh = ef 200mm f2.0L

=$6000, not in the OP's budget


237
EOS Bodies / Re: 5D3 or 1DX for Ultimate Image Quality...
« on: March 01, 2012, 10:23:52 AM »
Which features of 1Dx would make it 'worth' ~2x the cost ?

Twice the frame rate ?

AF features ?

~81% the number of pixels with some degree of  'improved' ISO sensitivity / dynamic range ?

Dual CF vs CF / SD card slot ?

Integrated grip?

Improved weathersealing ?

Custom features ?

I was planning on the 1Dx but am now questioning my commitment.  The 5DIII seems like the marriage between my 1dIV and 7D with more pixels / full-frame sensor. 

How much better DR / ISO performance can we hope the 1Dx will have c/w the 5DIII and does that justify the 'surcharge' for some of these other features ?

238
Lenses / Re: 70-200 f/2.8 IS L II -VS- 135 f/2 L + 70-200 f/4 IS L
« on: February 29, 2012, 09:24:03 AM »
That is definitely a jack-of-all trade lens (but master of none).  I did try it at one indoor event, and had to really slow down the shutter speed, so it was only usable for me for stationary shots. IQ was good, but not as sharp as either the 70-200 or 135, but definitely usable.  The extra reach may prove useful to some, but if changing lenses as needed is not an issue, I'd go for the extra stops of light with the 135, and stay with constant f4 zoom. 
Again, photography is about choices / compromises and planning ahead.  No one (affordable) lens exists to cover every situation. I guess that is why my camera bags have become so full.  ;)

239
Lenses / Re: 70-200 f/2.8 IS L II -VS- 135 f/2 L + 70-200 f/4 IS L
« on: February 29, 2012, 12:50:53 AM »
I regularly use both the 135 and the 70-200 f2.8 II and as mentioned it depends on what / where you want to shoot. I don't use the f4 zoom ( see below).
The 135 is fantastic. especially but not limited to when that extra stop is needed, and it is a bit less obtrusive.
Indoor sports is my primary use, so originally I bought the 2.8 II 70-200 with a 7d (incorrectly assuming I needed the extra reach, but I found the lighting a bigger challenge.) To handle that,  I now have the 1d IV, and I still find that I lean on the faster 135 much more.  For my shoots (low light),  I not only need the increased ISO sensitivity of the 1 series (c/w the 7d) but I find it more worthwhile to trade off a little reach / zoom flexibility for that extra stop. That may not be as important to you.
If/when I go full frame, I anticipate facing the dilemma of even less crop, but with added / better low light sensitivity so I may be able to go back to using the 70-200 2.8 again.
The versatility / quality of the faster 2.8 zoom made the f4 not an option for my work, but think carefully which is more important for you.
You might re-consider both the 70-200 f4 AND the 135 b/c as I see it you kind of get the best of both worlds = albeit the difference in quality/speed between the f4 and 2.8 II for me was the deal breaker.
Not an easy choice, but looking at the lens gallery will only make it harder to decide b/c it won't be 'obvious' which has better image quality.  YOU have to think what lighting conditions you will want to shoot, and then the decision becomes a LITTLE easier.  Good luck !!!!

240
EOS Bodies / Re: Just got word the 5D III isn't coming this week
« on: February 28, 2012, 07:14:22 PM »
Engagement Photo - Polaroid

Wedding Video - VCR

Child's first birthday - Point and Shoot

Child's Graduation - SLR

Child's Wedding - dSLR

First Grandchild - 5d III

First Grandchild's inheritance (well at least we have nice photos of him  :) )

Pages: 1 ... 14 15 [16] 17 18 ... 23