December 22, 2014, 08:09:02 PM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Crapking

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 26
31
Canon EF Zoom Lenses / Re: Canon EF 200-400mm f/4L IS USM Extender 1.4x
« on: October 30, 2014, 07:52:58 AM »
untitled-341.jpg by NAVBPhotos, on Flickr

Here was similar one @f/11, but had to lower shutter, raise ISO - I suspect most would tolerate higher ISO and raise shutter even more - but ahh the compromises we make :).  If you were to purchase a shot like this or the last one, what is more important, DOF, stop action, or noise ??

32
Canon EF Zoom Lenses / Re: Canon EF 200-400mm f/4L IS USM Extender 1.4x
« on: October 30, 2014, 07:40:37 AM »
Tee Time by NAVBPhotos, on Flickr

Comments on the bokeh here ?
Distracting or interesting? Was really only playing a round of golf and bringing the camera was an afterthought, but did want to see how this lens performed wide open.  I have been trying to shoot more open, and with lower ISO lately and not sure this works for this shot.
As a side note, I actually had a hole-in-one on this hole a few weeks ago, so wanted to get a tee to green shot as someone tee'd off.  I like the dreamy quality but if this was your tee shot, would you want more depth of field ?

33
Canon EF Zoom Lenses / Re: Canon EF 200-400mm f/4L IS USM Extender 1.4x
« on: October 30, 2014, 07:26:25 AM »
Fall golf by NAVBPhotos, on Flickr

Took this monster out for a swing on my latest golf afternoon. On loan from CPS for some field hockey / volleyball tournaments this week, but snuck out to play / shoot too.  My playing partner was gracious enough to let me take a few shots.  Really enjoyed this lens, was surprisingly able to handhold this with a RRS L plate on my 1Dx - though was glad to put it down in my golf cart between shots / holes.

34
Animal Kingdom / Re: BIRD IN FLIGHT ONLY -- share your BIF photos here
« on: October 29, 2014, 09:43:19 AM »

What an excellent capture. And what a great lens. Very thin DOF

Thanks - this lens is really something special - I'll be adding more photos to the lens' thread when I sadly return int next week....

35
Animal Kingdom / Re: BIRD IN FLIGHT ONLY -- share your BIF photos here
« on: October 29, 2014, 08:12:04 AM »
BlueJays by NAVBPhotos, on Flickr

Have the 200-400 on loan this week and was sitting on my back porch watching the bluejays eat my deer's corn.... :)
Wasn't really paying attention to settings as much as enjoying a coffee/scenery so a little noisy (ISO 5000)

36
EOS Bodies / Re: EOS 7D Mark II Shipping October 30, 2014
« on: October 18, 2014, 07:10:53 AM »
On Oct 8 I posted that Bestbuy.com updated their shipping to Oct 30th :)

38
EOS Bodies / Re: Scott Kelby Does a Field Report on the EOS 7D Mark II
« on: October 09, 2014, 10:44:33 AM »
Typical Kelby fluff with little stuff, but nonetheless a reassuring overview for those of us who pre-ordered. Which btw I just received notification that release date is now Oct 30th - just in time for Halloween and High School Fall Championships.

Who is quoting Oct 30th?  I also pre-ordered, but had not heard that date.

Bestbuy.com  I pre-ordered a couple of weeks ago ( about 1 wk after announcement) and initially was told Nov 17th, then I just got an email saying Oct 30th....

39
EOS Bodies / Re: Scott Kelby Does a Field Report on the EOS 7D Mark II
« on: October 08, 2014, 05:27:29 PM »
Typical Kelby fluff with little stuff, but nonetheless a reassuring overview for those of us who pre-ordered. Which btw I just received notification that release date is now Oct 30th - just in time for Halloween and High School Fall Championships.

It was extremely reassuring and touched on almost all of the marks I required.  I do agree that there was a lot of fluff and comparison to the 1dx, but overall, it set my mind at ease.

OCT 30th, SERIOUSLY!!  WOOT! YAY!

I concur with 1Dx 'big little brother' excessive comparisons, and lack of comparison / noted improvements over the original 7D - you would have thought at least a superficial "Is it worth upgrading" would have been included.
 
Also they started to discuss / compare with 1dMark IV, but never addressed it directly - I actually have owned both, but recently sold my 7D this spring in anticipation of upgrading, and am trying to sell my 1d Mark IV but having trouble now that the spec's on the 7D II are out....
If I was limited to just one (the 7D II or the 1D IV), that would be difficult, I was hoping to be reassured that my decision to go with the 7D II (as my primary backup to the 1Dx) was going to be addressed, but ... alas, since I will have both for awhile, I will be able to directly compare and then sell off the 'loser'  :)

40
EOS Bodies / Re: Scott Kelby Does a Field Report on the EOS 7D Mark II
« on: October 08, 2014, 03:29:06 PM »
Typical Kelby fluff with little stuff, but nonetheless a reassuring overview for those of us who pre-ordered. Which btw I just received notification that release date is now Oct 30th - just in time for Halloween and High School Fall Championships. 

41
Post Processing / Re: Fast editing of RAWs to "camera like" Jpegs
« on: October 04, 2014, 11:19:19 AM »
Remember with LR you can apply previously used develop settings during the import.
I created very basic profiles as a rough starting point then tweak as needed.
Consider including as a starting point....(depending on camera/lens)
Lens calibration on
contrast +5
highlights  - 50-75
shadows + 25
detail + 5
vibrancy +10
Sharpness + 50
NR +20
Camera profile to any of the factory options (portrait/landscape/standard) or better yet a ColorPassport custom profile for each lens. 

42
Animal Kingdom / Re: BIRD IN FLIGHT ONLY -- share your BIF photos here
« on: September 01, 2014, 09:23:10 PM »
14Annapolis-8 by NAVBPhotos, on Flickr

43
Lenses / Re: 200 f/2.0 vs 70-200 f/2.8 II
« on: August 24, 2014, 09:25:08 PM »
Intensity by NAVBPhotos, on Flickr

Just another example from the 200/2 to look at. I shoot regularly with both, but if only had I chance, would ALWAYS grab the 200/2 - faster AF, better bokeh, more natural color tones, but the versatility/flexibility of the 70-200 sometimes trumps the 200....but if I have the space / time to plan my shots, the 200/2 is my go-to lens.

Even outdoors when the f2.0 isn't needed, there is just something about this lens...Tight Turn by NAVBPhotos, on Flickr

44
EOS Bodies - For Video / Re: 5D Mk3 Grainy footage. Any ideas?
« on: March 14, 2014, 11:26:19 AM »
I would first import the clips, cut and create the timeline as you suggested and then denoise and color grade (first denoise, then color grade). I noticed you said 1080i@29.97, 1080i has the same vertical resolution as 720p so it's softer for that reason also. I looked into Atomos Ninja when it seemed to be all the hype, I found it to be too much of a compromise but I don't remember the specifics anymore. Can your atomos record in 1080p? If it can, turn that on. Also your shutter speed of 60 fps? That's fine if you're making a film but have you ever seen sharp frames of volleyball in a movie? Of course not, it's all soft and motion blurry to give it that cinematic feel. You'd only use higher shutter speeds for special occasions, maybe a slo-mo close up of the person hitting the winning "goal" (I have no idea what a goal is called in volleyball) but even then not the jerky crisp kind. you have to decide on the look you want, that's the first thing. your look defines everything else. you don't shoot at 1/60s because it's 1/60s f/4 ISO 1600 outside, you shoot at 1/60s because that's what the look you're going for demands and add or substract light according to the light you have available. i would avoid sharpening the image too much, you might get some artefacts. get neat video, import into fcp, denoise with neat video, add sc sharpen to sharpen the image a little, adjust contrast (the less contrast, the more soft the image appears) and see what you get. have you compared 1080p footage SOOC without ninja and the 1080i (deinterlaced interpreted 1080p but really 720p-verticalres)? which looks softer? is it the camera only being able to output 1080i but not 1080p or is it the limitation of the ninja recorder? you need to find the cause of the perceived softness to see if there's anything you can do about it.
Thanks for your time / opinions on this - the look I am trying to achieve is the 'sharpest (best-focused) / least motion-blur' game footage for players/parents/coaches.
With these recording options on the Ninja2
(HD 1080i60, 1080i59.94, 1080i50, 1080p30, 1080p25,
1080p24, 1080p23.98, 1080p30(60i), 1080p25(50i),
1080p24(60i), 1080p23.98(60i), 720p60, 720p59.94,
20p50, SD 486i59.94, 576i50)
which would you recommend, and with the 5d3, I am not sure if the compression 'option' is relevant when outputting thru the HDMI, but if it does, which do you prefer? Also, with respect to shutter speed, I chose 1/60 for the 'rule' of 2x frame rate, but should I shoot 1080p30(60i) or go to 720p60/ I do that, then while the NINJA says it supports that, it is not an option when I tried it last time (not sure if I made mistake in camera output) or if it is real limitation (typo) on their end.  My ultimate goal is to have a tournament's worth of games on a BLURAY disc look as focused/sharp and correctly colored as possible.  :)
Appreciate your clarifying my settings/workflow.

45
EOS Bodies - For Video / Re: 5D Mk3 Grainy footage. Any ideas?
« on: March 10, 2014, 10:43:26 PM »
Assume for a moment, we are starting from scratch to shoot a volleyball match with a tripod (static) game film for the players/coaches. No tracking, just a simple behind the court view, and a second camera zoomed to the net for closeups, and a third camera on the scoreboard for cutaways after each point.
5d3 settings I currently use are 1/60, f8 and ISO to slightly overexpose (usually 2500, 3200 range) with MF achieved by zooming 10x during warmups at the players near the net, (using my 24-70 and 70-200 lenses), with a clean output via HDMI to Atomos Ninja2 on one of my bodies and CF cards on the other two (using IPB-I) and for the Ninja which codes to ProRes HQ 1080i@29.97
I import all 3 large clips to FCP, make my multi cam action edits, then export to H.264 codec to my website for all to view/download. Prior to export, when is the best time to denoise/colorgrade, etc?? Should I batch process each of the 3 large files before the edits, then import into FCP, or create the final timeline, then process??
Any other suggestions ??

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 26