31
PowerShot / Re: A New Large Sensor PowerShot Coming [CR1]
« on: May 08, 2013, 07:07:39 PM »Full frame G10 with fixed 40mm pancake, where are you?
/dreaming
Keep on dreaming.........................
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Full frame G10 with fixed 40mm pancake, where are you?
/dreaming
To all 5D III owners,
How do you like the AF speed of Canon 85L II on your 5D III?
I'm thinking adding this lens to my gear.
Thank you,
Dylan

. 40mm is great lens if you want to go light.Yes, I trust my 5d3 using single point AF on Any cross-type point's @ Any Aperture on a still subject.
I'm not sure I want 85L II, since my kids are quite active.
So are mine. But even active kids stop to smell the flowers...
EOS 5D Mark II, EF 85mm f/1.2L II USM @ 1/60 s, f/1.8, ISO 400
EOS 5D Mark II, EF 85mm f/1.2L II USM @ 1/320 s, f/2.2, ISO 100
EOS 7D, EF 85mm f/1.2L II USM, 1/250 s, f/2.2, ISO 100

Is the AF of the 85mm 1.2 II fast enough to shoot kids who are almost always on the move
1Dx 70-200f/2.8 II, Shot @ f/8 & 1/250th ISO200
Right now, I am just taking pictures of books. I want the camera for the best still pictures there are. I went on Sigma's site and saw that pictures there were significantly better than what my camera produces. I want that same quality.
I have a 18-55mm and a 55-250mm. Both Canon. I am pleased with both. I am not a specialist in cameras though.
What is the verdict?
After using the f/2.8 for a couple of weeks, I decided to the sell the f/4. The IS is noticeably better and for me, having f/2.8 as an option makes it much more versatile for me. I would typically bring the f/4 to my event and wildlife work, but would also have to bring my faster prime lenses, whereas now I can just bring one lens. So the smaller lens actually ended up taking up more room and being heavier because of the need to bring my 135 and other lenses with it.
If I was just interested in landscape or travel photography, the f/4 (along with the 17-40 and 240-105) would do me fine, but for the work I do, the f/2.8 seems to be the lens I've been missing!
I currently have a stellar copy of the mkI 24-70L and I'm very happy with it. But the mkII sure does look tempting...but it's not on my priority list at the moment. It's a big cost for a little improvement.
So was I. I had both copies of the 24-70L. I had a stellar copy of the Mk. I but decided to let go of it as the Mk II is lighter & the lens hood is more discreet compared to Mark I. Most of all, I am impressed with the sharpness and contrast of the Mark II and it is indeed worth the investment.
Ah cool, good for you bud! It sure looks like a nice lens. I'm more of a prime lens user, so my 24-70L isn't as heavily used as some. So I'm not too fussed about changing it up. But if a new ef 35mm f1.4 II L comes out....I'll be all over one of those!