June 19, 2013, 01:48:41 AM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Dylan777

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 115
46
EOS Bodies / Re: Patents: New 50mm, 85mm & 135mm Lenses
« on: June 11, 2013, 08:07:20 AM »
135 f/2.0 with IS would be awesome ... if they do release it, I hope Canon goes easy on its pricing.

RLPhoto will like this rumor. He might wait for BigValue sale though ;D

47
EOS Bodies / Re: Patents: New 50mm, 85mm & 135mm Lenses
« on: June 11, 2013, 08:05:10 AM »
I'm very happy with the replacement of 24-70 f2.8 II + 70-200 f2.8 IS II from Canon.

If this rumor is true, I'll pre-order one of each ;)

48
Software & Accessories / Re: About to start with Focal
« on: June 10, 2013, 10:07:50 AM »
Stable tripod on stable surface (concrete slab is better than hardwood or carpet).

Lots of light, you want EV's above 10.  Use tungsten/halogen, not fluorescent or LED.

+1...be careful when you change AFMA values during test, since 5D III is not fully auto. Extra firm tight on tripod head. Long USB cable - from camera to PC - will help from accidently bump.

49
Lenses / Re: 17-55 internal dust removal
« on: June 10, 2013, 12:27:05 AM »
Update - I gave it a bash and this is what I learned. Although I managed to open it up and use a blower and reassemble it quite easily, I found that no matter how much you try it is impossible to remove all the dust. As you place the front element back in place, some of the dust creeps back in. Also I noticed some smudgy streaky lines that weren't there before so I took it apart a second time to clean the inside of the front element. I got most of it clean but to be fair I think it's just the same now as before I started! Luckily the lens still works and I think I will leave it for now. At least I can say I tried!

 :-\

For $25 to $50, I think you should go for it. I'm waiting for my 85L II to collect more before sending it in. Otherwise, it will be used as is.

50
Reviews / Re: Canon 24-70 f/2.8L II vs. Sigma 24-70
« on: June 09, 2013, 11:06:07 PM »
If they get to pick one for FREE between Canon and Sigma, I wonder which lens they would take home? ::)


51
Software & Accessories / Re: Help needed regarding editing
« on: June 09, 2013, 03:48:17 PM »
Try these presets. My fav is modern film 1. Some minor adjustments are needed to get the results you are looking for.

http://vsco.co/film

52
Lenses / Re: WA lens advice 16-35 II or the TSE 17
« on: June 09, 2013, 03:40:16 PM »
Skip 16-35 II. Nothing special @ f2.8.  I'm thinking 14mm prime, since 95% of my landscape shots @ 16mm.

Thanks ... The 14mm prime crossed my mind too. But from what I've heard you can stitch the TSE's images quite well and make it a panoramic shot ... That said, I wouldn't mind a canon 14-24 which is as good as the 24-70 II.

Count me in for that ;)

53
Lenses / Re: 17-55 internal dust removal
« on: June 09, 2013, 03:38:37 PM »
I recently pickup 85L II and it has 1 tiny dust speck inside, rear end. It will be used as is.

54
Lenses / Re: WA lens advice 16-35 II or the TSE 17
« on: June 09, 2013, 11:03:30 AM »
Skip 16-35 II. Nothing special @ f2.8.  I'm thinking 14mm prime, since 95% of my landscape shots @ 16mm.

55
Lenses / Re: 85L v 85LII
« on: June 09, 2013, 10:30:06 AM »
I recently pickup a used 85L II. All I can say is WOW. The bokeh and sharpness are amazing. AF is on slow side, but very acurate.

http://www.canonrumors.com/forum/index.php?topic=15242.30

56
Lenses / Re: $1550 for a used 85L f1.2 II
« on: June 09, 2013, 10:09:55 AM »
Very nice.  That is a pretty bokeh... and I guess I will have to break it to the wife that I am not done with buying lenses... she'll be mad at you.

Go for it...I'll take a blame. ;D

For now, I'm good with lenses. I'm going to add another FF body some time this year. Not sure which model yet - 1D X, 5D III or just simple 6D to save money for L lenses.

The new 200-400 and 400mm f2.8 IS II are next on my dream list. I will have to pick one :P....

57
Lenses / Re: $1550 for a used 85L f1.2 II
« on: June 09, 2013, 02:48:04 AM »
So did you get shived?  Have you heard the words, "Bring out the gimp." in the past 24 hours?  Come on... inquiring minds want to know...




Here are few more. JPEG, straight out camera, no PP. No time for PP raw yet. I'm going to sleep now. It's 12mid night in California.

http://albums.phanfare.com/isolated/T3su9U5p/1/6099400

58
Lenses / Re: $1550 for a used 85L f1.2 II
« on: June 09, 2013, 02:07:30 AM »
So did you get shived?  Have you heard the words, "Bring out the gimp." in the past 24 hours?  Come on... inquiring minds want to know...

Got it...I just want to thanks everyone for all the tips on how to identify refurb lens :o

1. Best Buy receipt is included
2. Serial number on the lens does match with the retial box and blank warranty card(looks just like regular card)
3. No red mark
4. Cosmetic looks just like new
5. It focus just like the copy I rented few weeks back. I didn't see focus shift from f1.2 t f2.8

One tiny problem, the lens has one tiny dust speck inside(rear end) :(. The seller didn't even see it until I pointed it out. He seems to be very honest though. Bottom line is I walked away with this 85L II for $1525(another $25 discounted due to a tiny dust speck).

Below is one of the pics I took inside starbuck @ f1.2. This is JPEG file, straight out from camera. no pp. Re-size only.

The 85L II seems to be sharper then my 135L.
* 1st photo is 85L @ f1.2
* 2nd photo is 135L @ f2
These are JPEG files, straight out from camera. no pp, only resize. With 85L, I took few steps forward to get 135mm view for comparison.

59
Lenses / Re: $1550 for a used 85L f1.2 II
« on: June 09, 2013, 01:51:34 AM »
So did you get shived?  Have you heard the words, "Bring out the gimp." in the past 24 hours?  Come on... inquiring minds want to know...

Got it...I just want to thanks everyone for all the tips on how to identify refurb lens :o

1. Best Buy receipt is included
2. Serial number on the lens does match with the retial box and blank warranty card(looks just like regular card)
3. No red mark
4. Cosmetic looks just like new
5. It focus just like the copy I rented few weeks back. I didn't see focus shift from f1.2 t f2.8

One tiny problem, the lens has one tiny dust speck inside(rear end) :(. The seller didn't even see it until I pointed it out. He seems to be very honest though. Bottom line is I walked away with this 85L II for $1525(another $25 discounted due to a tiny dust speck).

Below is one of the pics I took inside starbuck @ f1.2. This is JPEG file, straight out from camera. no pp. Re-size only.



60
Lenses / Re: Is the 16-35 L II worth its price?
« on: June 08, 2013, 09:44:55 AM »
The sunstars with the 16-35 are among the best I've ever seen on any lens.

You should see the sun stars on the 24-70ii, if that's the case (if you haven't already). At f8 they're remarkable.

Mid afternoon. crop nearly 60%. 5D III + 24-70 II F7

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 115