March 01, 2015, 02:47:01 PM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Dylan777

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 301
46
EOS Bodies / Re: Big Announcements Coming Next Week [CR3]
« on: January 27, 2015, 11:23:22 AM »
The MOST important factor for Canon to gain ground in mirrorless world is EF adapter to mirrorless. If they can come up with adapter with decent AF speed, better than current ones on the market, I think that will give Sony, Fuji etc... good run.

Enlighten me on why they need an (EF adaptor to mirrorless) "adaptor to mirrorless with decent AF speed"?

In what way does the current EF-EOS M Mount Adaptor affect "AF speed"? And how would you improve it?

Or are you talking about some other adaptor?

EF-M lenses were designed to mount to EOS-M directly, no adaptor needed.

For Canon shooters, standard EF and L lenses are as good as gold. These lenses can still be used with EOS-M system with an adaptor, however, AF speed becomes slower.
 
“how would you improve it?” -  I leave that to Canon.

47
EOS Bodies / Re: Big Announcements Coming Next Week [CR3]
« on: January 27, 2015, 10:23:30 AM »
The M3 could be interesting for me, depends on the specs.   Possibly the 11-24/4 at some point, too.

To me, M3 needs decent AF speed, EVF and of course few more  native small primes.

The MOST important factor for Canon to gain ground in mirrorless world is EF adapter to mirrorless. If they can come up with adapter with decent AF speed, better than current ones on the market, I think that will give Sony, Fuji etc... good run.
You want primes, the next poster wants an 18-200, presumably native, and I'd like a tiny native 15-85. Which do you think is going to come first? I'm not sure but my guess is the primes come last. In the age of extremely high quality zooms, prime lenses are so esoteric that they are positively elitist.

I agree that an EF-to-M adaptor plus a speed booster are essential. Otherwise, Canon can't leverage their large lens lineups and, if MILCs replace DSLRs in the next 5 years or so, Canon will find themselves years behind Sony, Fuji, Panasonic, Olympus and Samsung. Canon can't afford to take that risk.

I agree with you about today zoom lenses.

However, fast(f2ish) and compact primes are always welcome for those low light shots. Not only that, it keeps the mirrorless system as compact as possible.

48
EOS Bodies / Re: Big Announcements Coming Next Week [CR3]
« on: January 27, 2015, 09:56:43 AM »
The M3 could be interesting for me, depends on the specs.   Possibly the 11-24/4 at some point, too.
I agree about the M3, especially if it's like this one:
http://www.dcfever.com/trading/view.php?itemID=2778059
It would be a great match for my imported 11-22, but I wonder if it will even be sold in the US:

The 11-24 f/4 is on my purchase list for the year.

Wow....looks good  :o

49
1D X Sample Images / Re: Anything shot with a 1DX - Page 2
« on: January 27, 2015, 09:53:05 AM »
Edward,
We still waiting for your Safari photo books ;)

Thanks Dylan, Yes, I need to stop travelling about taking Images and spend more time at Home, on the other hand, need to start packing again   :)

Edward,
I'm sure many/most CR members would look forward for your electronic  postcards.

50
EOS Bodies / Re: Big Announcements Coming Next Week [CR3]
« on: January 27, 2015, 09:47:27 AM »
The M3 could be interesting for me, depends on the specs.   Possibly the 11-24/4 at some point, too.

To me, M3 needs decent AF speed, EVF and of course few more  native small primes.

The MOST important factor for Canon to gain ground in mirrorless world is EF adapter to mirrorless. If they can come up with adapter with decent AF speed, better than current ones on the market, I think that will give Sony, Fuji etc... good run.

51
Lenses / Re: Canon 35mm F2 IS image quality
« on: January 27, 2015, 09:19:22 AM »
In my opinion, the 35mm f/2 IS is a great lens!

Nicely done candyman. I like background light.

52
I enjoyed your review. Now, where is that 35PM on medium format ::)

53
EOS Bodies / Re: Big Announcements Coming Next Week [CR3]
« on: January 26, 2015, 08:01:46 PM »
Um...let's see:

•The two high megapixel cameras, with and without an AA filter. Resolution is said to be 53mp (though the pixel count is not CR3)

•The EOS Rebel T6i/750D.

•EF 11-24 f/4L  :o :o :o

•EOS M3 Camera

•Various PowerShot cameras

54
Landscape / Re: Moon photos
« on: January 24, 2015, 04:16:35 PM »
Yes, These are the moon pictures in my point of views/ my Ideas/ My Imagination.
Enjoy.
Surapon

This looks interesting...  :o

55
Lenses / Re: 24-70 f4 IS vs. 24-105 IS
« on: January 24, 2015, 04:10:56 PM »
Real upgrade would be 24-70 f2.8 II. Keep your 24-105 until you ready.

56
Business of Photography/Videography / Re: The Pros or The Enthusiasts?
« on: January 23, 2015, 08:42:31 PM »
I consider myself as "enthusiast", not because I want to look or compete with the PRO.

I want the best gear that can provide best IQ @ the price I can afford.

57
EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: Help with upgrade from T3i?
« on: January 23, 2015, 10:09:13 AM »
Thanks for all the help so far guys! How much better would you say the FF ISO performance is? 2 stops?

I only shoot RAW so its pretty noticeable at 3200 for me. Even whites seem to start getting this rainbow fringing going on.

I like that FF has better DOF aswell. I was leaning towards the 5D III with a 24-70 F4 IS L. Since I have the 70-200 already. Though I may just go with a fast 50mm prime. I always shot prime lenses with film and loved it.

http://www.canonrumors.com/forum/index.php?topic=10201.0

Like I said, DxO Prime will take you even further in high ISO world

59
EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: Help with upgrade from T3i?
« on: January 22, 2015, 11:52:52 PM »
I would go FF. Add DxO, 6400ISO should be no problem in low light. Sell your crop gear and put that money toward new 24-70 f2.8 II.

60
Lenses / Re: 17-40 ---> 16-35 f4
« on: January 22, 2015, 07:35:09 PM »
Congrats.

You will enjoy it  :)

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 301