May 24, 2013, 08:38:58 AM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Dylan777

Pages: 1 ... 57 58 [59] 60 61 ... 107
871
Lenses / Re: AFMA'ed the 24-70 mk.ii ... not sure I am loving it.
« on: October 16, 2012, 07:25:32 PM »
left side vignetting still looks heavier to me, darker and intrudes into the image more than on the right side

+1....left side does seem to be heavier.

872
It's fun to do take photography as hobby. But when you switch a hobby into professional....this no longer fun.

I have 4 friends(Wedding Pro for 15yrs), they have their own studio(s) and most of their camera gear is always up to date. To cover the entile wedding, they always go out as a pair. Each carry 2 FF bodies and decent L lenses.

I talked to them quite often about photograhpy business - after all expenses, they take home around $50K - $65K a year(in Califonia, this considered as min income). Their work hours are not 9-5, they spend ave 10 to 12hrs per day in studio for PP, edit, printing etc (monday to friday). Their weekend is mostly at wedding events....

If your current income is $100K or above, I suggest you keep photography as a hobby.

873
Lenses / Re: Next Lens
« on: October 16, 2012, 09:20:56 AM »
If you can get the 24-70 II and pair that up with your new 5D III, I think you are set with wedding.

I'm on the same boat, 35L or 50L??? I'm leaning more to 50L.

874
Lenses / Re: B&H Issues!!!
« on: October 16, 2012, 09:12:08 AM »
I ordered compact flash card and card reader from BH about a week ago. Yesterday, Oct 15th around 7:30AM, I received an email from BH indicated my order has been shipped - with tracking number.

Today, Oct 16th, I still can't track the order. :(

Wonder if this is UPS or BH issue????

875
EOS Bodies / Re: EOS 1DX small discount on eBay
« on: October 15, 2012, 01:51:04 PM »
I just saw this on eBay, so I'm just putting it out there if anyone is interested. The 1DX is going for $6445.

http://www.ebay.com/itm/Canon-EOS-1DX-Digital-SLR-Camera-5253B002-USA-Warranty-/160875216019?pt=Digital_Cameras&hash=item2574e8fc93


Will get one if the price around $5800ish ::)

876
EOS-M / Re: Canon EOS-M to Ship Today in North America
« on: October 15, 2012, 01:46:15 PM »
Waiting for Canon to release a FF mirriorless with classic chassis. Until then....no more P&S nor crop sensor.

877
Lenses / Re: AFMA'ed the 24-70 mk.ii ... not sure I am loving it.
« on: October 15, 2012, 10:27:22 AM »
Ok gents, Bought focal and set it all up. Before Focal I was +5/+6 for w/t

test 1 W with focal said set w=0
test 2 T said set T= -1
test 3 W said set W = -1 (down 1 form last test)
test 4 T said set T = +4 (up 5 from last test)

Should I keep going in endless loops of T +W tests? I know the W setting affects the T setting so when should I call it quits?

K-amps - I ran my 16-35 II and 24-70 II  thtrough FoCal Pro x3 per lens. The results I got are same.

A tripod plays major role in this test, hope you have a decent one. Also, I'm running on window(5D III), therefore, I was required to change the AFMA values manually in camera and small movement could changes the value(s).

878
This one I shot at 70mm f 3.2 iso 3200 and for an ooc jpg its pretty sharp and very accurate color.

It's a keeper to me...nice shot

879
Pricewatch Deals / Re: Deal: Canon EOS 5D Mark III Body for $2899
« on: October 13, 2012, 04:46:51 PM »
After passing Adorama's and BC's ebay deals I pulled the trigger and took B&H's kit. (oh I have to correct my signature :-) )

It seems that the sell isn't going as fast as in the last two deals.

Adorama 818 in some 8 hours, but @2749
Beach Camera 120 in 5 hours @2849
Beach Camera 16 in 2 hours @2899

It's hard to be smart, but I belive if people paid $3500 for it, it is definetly worth getting it for $2900 from an authorized dealer.

Will it be cheaper than $2700 at Christmas or Thanksgiving? I highy doubt it, but you never know.

I just pulled the trigger =O

Feel released now :P

880
I'm absolutely LOVING mine.  I've taken it to shoot with my 7D, 5DIII, and my 1DX.  Perfect with all of them. Trying to figure out why I still have my 24-105...Not even close!

You saving the 24-105 for A Bright-Sunny-Day :P...........JK

881
and take picture of kid(s)
From experience - you must remember to take pictures of your second born too... Not just the odd one here and there...
And if you have a third and... Well, they need to be photographed as much as the first (and second...)


Thank you for remind me on this :)

This is so true. I took alot of pictures with my 1st, but not quite same amount on my 2nd. I kinda noticed that after my 2nd child first birthday. I promised myself picture will be taken evenly from there on.

Because of the kids, therefore, I spent quite a bit of money into camera gear. And I'm proud that I'm only dad carries the best camera gear in the Montessori Pre-school at Saint Columbun Church  ;D ;D ;D...sorry couldn't help it :P




882

"Ok So your telling me I spent all that extra money for nothing to gain an extra stop but not IS. Is that what your saying. That does not make me feel good about my purchase anymore."

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm not a camera geek, I just take my new lens attaches to my 5D III and go out take pictures. If the pictures look sharp on my 24" monitor, then I'm good. If pictures are soft, then return it and get another one.

When budget is allowed, 24-105 users will end up with 24-70 II. Until then, their 24-105 is the best.

Just like food....see and smell are not enough, you gotta taste it. ;)

JUST ENJOY YOUR NEW TOY and take picture of kid(s)

883
It sounds like it will be a very good lens.  Some are reporting issues at the long end, so I'd check that out.
I'm waiting for the eventual price drop to decide if I'll get one.  By then,there will be a lot of feedback from users.


What issues?

Softness, particularly at the edges and 70mm. 
Two pretty respected reviewers have seen this.  There have been some that claim to have seen the issue in poosts on this forum, but I tend to look to experienced testers with a good track record of spotting issues.
  It is undoubtedly a fantastic lens, and there may be some samples with issues, which is why I'm waiting for more reviews to come in.  I've had 5 of the old version and they were not impressive.  I have high hopes for this one.
 
Let us know what you see.
http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/Canon-EF-24-70mm-f-2.8-L-II-USM-Lens-Review.aspx
 
http://www.photozone.de/canon_eos_ff/773-canon2470f28mk2ff?start=2


Yeah that sounds the case but I feel it's much better than the 24-105 and if I go professional I could always get another copy later if that's the case. Either way after selling the old lens it cost me an additional $1,400 and I figured I could use it for the holidays so not sure how much waiting I could endure. I hope I made a wise investment. Let me know if you get one. How could I check if my copy was soft?


I have 4 friends(pro-wedding), all their 24-70 II are sharp end to end. My is sharp even before AFMA.

Do you use Reiken FoCal? I ran my 5D III with 24-70 II through FoCal, results I got from the software are -5 @ 24mm and +1 @ 70mm.

If not, you can always try to compare Live View Focus Vs regular focus.

Enjoy your new lens ;)


I think I will get that. @ questions would you recommend plus or pro and is there a way to calibrate without a tripod. I do not have one?


To be honest...I would go for PRO version. It worth it. One of most important steps is setting your target. YOU HAVE TO HAVE decent tripod for this test. Why? - Your lens and target need to be in same height.

I'm currently using this one. Not the best, but it's good enough to do landscape.
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/687335-REG/Oben_AC_1410_BA_0_AC_1410_Aluminum_Tripod_w.html

I will get a decent tripod, 22lbs load, in the future though.


884
Lenses / Re: Which Prime: 50L or 35L?
« on: October 13, 2012, 01:39:42 AM »

Thanks guys for all your wonderful thoughts.

I'm going to enjoy my KILLER-COMBO 24-70 II and 70-200 f2.8 IS II for now. Both handle in low light very well with 5D III. I really like the 50L, but I'm going to wait for version II. Current version seems to have too many issues.

885
It sounds like it will be a very good lens.  Some are reporting issues at the long end, so I'd check that out.
I'm waiting for the eventual price drop to decide if I'll get one.  By then,there will be a lot of feedback from users.


What issues?

Softness, particularly at the edges and 70mm. 
Two pretty respected reviewers have seen this.  There have been some that claim to have seen the issue in poosts on this forum, but I tend to look to experienced testers with a good track record of spotting issues.
  It is undoubtedly a fantastic lens, and there may be some samples with issues, which is why I'm waiting for more reviews to come in.  I've had 5 of the old version and they were not impressive.  I have high hopes for this one.
 
Let us know what you see.
http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/Canon-EF-24-70mm-f-2.8-L-II-USM-Lens-Review.aspx
 
http://www.photozone.de/canon_eos_ff/773-canon2470f28mk2ff?start=2


Yeah that sounds the case but I feel it's much better than the 24-105 and if I go professional I could always get another copy later if that's the case. Either way after selling the old lens it cost me an additional $1,400 and I figured I could use it for the holidays so not sure how much waiting I could endure. I hope I made a wise investment. Let me know if you get one. How could I check if my copy was soft?


I have 4 friends(pro-wedding), all their 24-70 II are sharp end to end. My is sharp even before AFMA.

Do you use Reiken FoCal? I ran my 5D III with 24-70 II through FoCal, results I got from the software are -5 @ 24mm and +1 @ 70mm.

If not, you can always try to compare Live View Focus Vs regular focus.

Enjoy your new lens ;)

Pages: 1 ... 57 58 [59] 60 61 ... 107