September 01, 2014, 11:00:25 AM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - marinien

Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6]
76
PowerShot Cameras / Re: *UPDATE 3* Canon PowerShot G1X Revealed
« on: January 05, 2012, 06:40:56 PM »
There's no doubt that it will have a 1/1.5" (smaller than Nikon 1) and not a 1.5" (bigger than Canon 1D) at this price point. Also Canon wouldn't dare create such a rift in their lineup, using a sensor that big in a "compact" body.

Still, the f/16 (minimum) aperture is interesting, usually compact don't go that small.

1/5" is bigger than the 1D series' sensor???

Ummmm...not quite.  What was stated was that 1.5" (not 1/5") is bigger than APS-H.  Decimal point, not fraction.  It's still not correct, but a 1.5" sensor would fall between 4/3" and APS-C in terms of size.  The fractional and larger inch designations are the outmoded nomenclature used for digicam/camcorder sensor sizes (which derives from vacuum tube diameters of the 50s era), and a 1.5" sensor would have approximately a 1" diagonal measure = 25.4 mm, and the diagonal measure of Canon's APS-C is 26.7mm.

Come on ... Have you read anything at all? Ah, I see, 1.9 (crop factor) is bigger than 1.3

It seems that someone wasn't reading, but that someone was you, not OvelhaMacho.   ::)

Neuro, I am disappointed  :-\. Of course I knew he meant decimal point and not fraction. I was just teasing him while saying 1.9 is bigger than 1.3. I said that he wasn't reading because you, among others, have said in this thread that a 1.5" sensor is smaller than APS-C and bigger than 4/3" sensor. Besides, you are the first in this thread who mentioned the 1.9 crop factor. See ... I was reading  ;)

77
PowerShot Cameras / Re: *UPDATE 3* Canon PowerShot G1X Revealed
« on: January 05, 2012, 06:13:40 PM »
There's no doubt that it will have a 1/1.5" (smaller than Nikon 1) and not a 1.5" (bigger than Canon 1D) at this price point. Also Canon wouldn't dare create such a rift in their lineup, using a sensor that big in a "compact" body.

Still, the f/16 (minimum) aperture is interesting, usually compact don't go that small.

1/5" is bigger than the 1D series' sensor??? Come on ... Have you read anything at all? Ah, I see, 1.9 (crop factor) is bigger than 1.3  8)

78
PowerShot Cameras / Re: *UPDATE* Canon PowerShot G1X Revealed
« on: January 05, 2012, 11:48:54 AM »
The reason why the sensor can't be 1.5" is the lens, not the price. The lens must cover the entire sensor (otherwise it's pointless to have a big sensor). Remember how big the 24-105 lens is? And that's an F4 even at 24mm.

I do not think that comparing lenses designed for (D)SLR and lenses designed for "mirrorless" system is appropriate (see "Lens Genealogy" by Roger Cicala). And I believe that that's why Neuro used the Olympus m43 kit lens for his example. Otherwise he would have used the 17-55 f/2.8 lens (shorter focal range, smaller apurture) instead.

Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6]