Messages

76

Lenses / Re: 100mm 2.8L Macro IS as a portrait lens

« on: January 26, 2013, 11:46:18 PM »

If you have that mentality, go shoot the 70-200 f4L IS. No one will be able to tell the difference between the 2.8.

Most people couldn't tell the difference between f 2.8 and f4.

Let us see. Can you tell me which one here is f/2.8, which is f/4, and which is f/2? All shot on crop.

https://picasaweb.google.com/102280064689407386179/Test?authkey=Gv1sRgCNeyraywjY3cBg#5837981280973351058

77

EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: Is Full Frame sharper than APS-C? My answer here

« on: January 26, 2013, 07:41:42 PM »

I created a few webpages about this topic here:

http://plamen.emilstefanov.net/index.htm

The answer is YES in principle but this also depends on the other factors.

...and I'll recommend it even more thoroughly once you get it out of the '90s-style under construction look....

LOL! You are pretty close! This is the default look of FrontPage 2003, only 10 years old.

78

EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: Is Full Frame sharper than APS-C? My answer here

« on: January 26, 2013, 05:38:01 PM »

I created a few webpages about this topic here:

http://plamen.emilstefanov.net/index.htm

The answer is YES in principle but this also depends on the other factors.