February 27, 2015, 08:05:05 PM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - RobertG.

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 11
I store my filters in the Lee Multi Filter Pouch and well, all 10 pouches are filled with Hitech filters :D The Lee filter pouch is very well made and I can recommend it. For the foundation kit + 105mm pol filter I also use the Lee pouch.

I do use the Lee foundation kit with two filters slots and the 105mm filter holder attached to it. I use an older 105mm Sigma EX pol filter for about 50% of all landscape shots.

For a test shot a minute ago I attached for the first time the wide angle adapter ring (82mm) to the Tamron SP 24-70 mm lens. In front of the lens was the Lee foundation kit + 105 pol filter. A little bit of mechanical vignetting is visible in the extrem corners from 24mm till ~33mm. At 35mm the vignetting is gone. But I normally use the TS-E lenses for such applications. With the TS-E 24 mm L II vignetting occurs at 5mm of shift. 

A reverse grad ND filter is a special filter for sunsets and sunrises. The Hitech website says:
"The reverse grad is a vital tool if you are looking to take sunrise or sunset shots. This is because the ND part of the grad is upside down, with the darker part at the middle of the filter and the lighter part at the top. This ensures the maximum light reduction when the sun is at or near the horizon." I couldn't describe it much better.

Best regards,

I use the Hitech soft edge grad ND and hard edge grad ND filters in size 100 mm x 125 mm for more than 3 years now. They are pretty good, especially for this price. I guess the quality of the normal Hitech filters is all the same. Only the size of filters differs. A real difference will only make their new Firecrest glass filter series, which is not yet fully available (only the 4" x 5.65" are for sale).

The Hitech filters are made of very high quality resin, which is normally not an issue. It's light weight and quite scratch resistant. Only when shooting in direct, strong sunlight it becomes obvious that something else was put in front of the lens. Then their might be some additional reflections and a slight decrease in sharpness. But in such a situation lens flare is the biggest concern. Lens flare ruined some of my shots but the reflections of the filter never did. The slight decrease in sharpness is hardly ever noticeable and was no concern for me so far.

For a start I would buy the 3 filter soft grad ND kit. The 0.6 soft grad ND filter will probably be used most of the time. The hard edge grad ND kit is OK but not that useful. I can't remember when I shot the last time with the 0.3 & 0.9 hard grad ND filters.... I guess except for some test shots I never used them again.

Instead of some colored filters I would buy the reverse grad ND filters. Both, the 0.6 & 0.9, are quite useful. I use them very often for sunset and sunrise shots. They really make a difference and are worth the price.

BTW, I never used other grad ND filters before, so I can't compare the Hitech one to other brands.

Kind regards,

Technical Support / Re: Canon Repair Facility in Germany
« on: July 29, 2014, 08:04:54 PM »
I had used only once a repair facility. It had been Foto Maerz in Berlin. I was very satisfied with the repairs, so I can recommend them.

Best regards, Robert

Landscape / Re: Moonlit Landscapes
« on: July 24, 2014, 03:40:02 PM »
In Pai, Thailand, at night
24mm f5.0 20sec ISO250, EV -1,7

Hi, it really depends where you are. Here in Germany the best place is probably our largest camera forum with more than 420.000 users. You open up a thread, add a few pictures and wait a couples of days for the private messages to arrive. Customers pay upfront by bank to bank transfer or Paypal. I bought two cameras and more than a dozen lenses like this and would do it again. 

A juvenile common tern in Essaouira, Morocco
5d II + EF 70-300 mm L @ 300 mm 1/2500 sec. f8

Lenses / Re: What Lenses are missing from Canon's range
« on: July 16, 2014, 01:25:05 PM »
A really good TS-E 45mm Mark II or another TS-E lens in the range of 40 mm till 60 mm would be great. It can be f2.8 because there is no real need for a faster TS-E lens. But a really good lens for product photography is missing. The gab between 24mm and 90mm is too large. It would also be useful for architecture, landscape, fashion, art reproduction etc.

Software & Accessories / Re: Neutral Density Filters
« on: July 12, 2014, 07:13:59 AM »
Did anyone of you test the new "Firecrest IRND" filters yet? They claim "The new Firecrest filters are the best NDs ever..." on their facebook page. At least they are the most expensive ones they ever made. I would really love to read some hands on experience. Thanks.

Photography Technique / Re: Sunset/Ocean Techniques?
« on: July 12, 2014, 07:08:45 AM »

A normal grad ND filter won't help you at all. For a sunset with the sun near the sea level a reverse grad ND filter is needed. A 2-stop filter (0.6) should do when the sun is very close to the sea level. The reverse grad ND filter from Formatt Hitech does a pretty good job.

EOS Bodies / Re: What do you hope-for MOST from Canon in 2014
« on: June 27, 2014, 07:06:25 PM »
*  5d MkIV - 26-30MP with improved DR sensor, 1 stop RAW image quality improvement in all ISO ranges, enhanced metering and autofocus system from 1DX, dual pixel autofocus from 70d, improved buffer (40 photos in full RAW), dual compact flash memory card slots, backlit buttons for low light shooting, 3.5" vari-angle OLED touch screen, GPS & WiFi, improved low light autofocus points in viewfinder for low light shooting in Ai servo autofocus mode

I'd buy that.

Me too. But the next 5D should come with a range of interchangeable focus screens like the 5D II or 6D.

Software & Accessories / Re: Inconspicuous Messenger Bag
« on: June 20, 2014, 01:14:19 PM »
Hi, I can recommend the Matin "Camera Bag Balade 300". It's pretty well made for the cheap price and big enough to carry the 5D III + 24-70 + 2 other lenses / 1 lens + 1 flash. About a half year ago I had been looking for a very inconspicuous bag and so I looked through all bags Amazon Germany had to offer (more than 1200). This one was my favorite because it was the most inconspicuous bag.
It performed very well during my 2 weeks trip to Thailand. It could be carried for several hours without problems. The padding is quite good. The padding inside can be removed and the bag can be folded to be just 5cm high. In comparison to some other bags there is a zipper to seal the main compartment, which offers a bit more protection. This no-name brand is also not known for camera bags, which might help, too.

Third Party Manufacturers / Re: Nikon's D800E 30% sharper than D800
« on: June 06, 2014, 06:40:42 PM »
Dilbert, Canon Rumors is a Canon equipment related webseite and forum. Who cares about Nikon?!

Care to take a gander at the sub forum you're in?

Yes, I have seen the subforum. It would be a prefect place to speak about things like Sigma lenses or Manfrotto tripods. But Nikon gear normally doesn't fit on a Canon camera. Endless discussion about Sony sensors in Nikon cameras doesn't help anyone shooting with Canon cameras and lenses.

Third Party Manufacturers / Re: Nikon's D800E 30% sharper than D800
« on: June 05, 2014, 04:10:59 PM »
Dilbert, Canon Rumors is a Canon equipment related website and forum. Who cares about Nikon?!

Spread useful information and experience about Canon gear. But don't bother us with Nikon.

Lenses / Re: What was your first L lens?
« on: June 05, 2014, 04:08:24 PM »
Hi, I can't really remember it anymore. I guess it was the EF 35L but it could also haven been the TS-E 24L.

Animal Kingdom / Re: Portraits from the Mara
« on: May 28, 2014, 07:40:57 PM »
Paolo, that's a nice copyright sign! But in some of the pictures the background is a bit distracting. Maybe to reverse it would help: a colorfull copyright on a b&w photo?

The pics on 500px are nice. Thanks for sharing them there. The large copyright sign on the small attachments ( 548x365 pixel) here is useless when you share them on 500px without it in a much larger resolution (2048x1152 pixel). Every picture you see in a browser can easily be downloaded. For Firefox there is e.g. the "Web Developer" add on, which let you see the image information of every graphic on a site. It can also easily be downloaded this way.

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 11