August 30, 2014, 04:19:40 AM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - nicke

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5
Lenses / Re: Poll: Most Wanted New Lenses of 2013.
« on: May 07, 2013, 11:00:35 AM »
A 17-40/4L IS that is sharp corner to corner with low distortion the full zoom-range and all apertures.

After a lot measuring I bought the LowPro Pro Trekker 300 AW, and the 5D mk III + Canon 2x extender + 300/2.8L fits in the bag! It is a lite bit tight but no problem to insert nor remove the camera.

Thanks for your replay!

I have been looking at the Lowepro Flipside 400 AW, but I prefer the Pro Trekker system due to it a bit deeper internally so that I can have my lenses standing in the case.

Software & Accessories / Re: Recommended case for Canon G1X???
« on: December 28, 2012, 02:36:51 AM »
I have a Lowepro Apex 100 AW for my G1 X, and it fits great. I do not have the filter adapter mounted on the camera, but I have it mounted on a B+W polarizing filter in a B+W Filter Pouch, and I have it in the space in front of the case ( and it fits without any problem.

I must upgrade my backpack, and due to that I live in a small town (with no good equipment stores) in Sweden, I can't try out the backpack before I buy it.

Normally when I carry the 300/2.8L IS II it is mounted on the 5D mk III without the extender. But sometimes I carry the extender mounted, so my question so, will the kit (300/2.8L IS II + Canon 2x extender + 5D mk III) fit mounted in a Lowepro Pro Trekker 300 AW (,2165,16.htm), or do I need the bigger 400 AW ( Often I do not carry the 300/2.8 and I think that the 400 AW will be unnecessary large for normal use.

When I measure the kit (300/2.8L IS II + Canon 2x extender + 5D mk III) it is 38.5 cm long and the Pro Trekker 300 AW have a height of 37 cm, but normally that is possible to fit a little bit bigger items in the bag.

Contests / Re: Gura Gear Giveaway!
« on: December 11, 2012, 07:04:28 AM »
For a looooong time I have ben interested to try the Gura Gear, but they are hard and very expensive to get in Sweden, so I would very much to win the kit due to it would be a great start for me.

Lenses / Re: Lens Filters -- preference?
« on: September 25, 2012, 10:49:06 AM »
Thanks -- I saw three B&W 77 mm XSPros... 1) Kaesemann Circular Polarizer MRC Nano Filter, 2) UV MRC-Nano 010M Filter and  3) Clear MRC-Nano 007

Which would you choose?

I have the B+W 007M MRC Nano Coated Clear Glass Protection Filter with XS-Pro (is also written as XSPD) Mount.

The Kaesemann Circular Polarizer is a superb polarizer filter, not a general protection filter (but extremely useful and highly recommended).

Lenses / Re: missing 200-400 and 100-400 announcements?
« on: September 19, 2012, 08:43:51 AM »

Lenses / Re: Post your 24-70 II Experiences Here
« on: September 12, 2012, 10:06:31 AM »
Some RAW files to let you make your own opinion:

Lenses / Re: Canon 24-70/2.8L II is official delayed - again
« on: September 12, 2012, 10:05:13 AM »
Luckely Canon Sweden was in error, today did I recive my 24-70/2.8L II! Some RAW-files for you to preview: Unpacking pictures (in Swedish):

Some RAW files from a 5D mk III and the new 24-70/2.8L II to let you make your own opinion.

Lenses / RAW files from the 24-70/2.8L II
« on: September 12, 2012, 08:32:20 AM »
On have I posted some RAW files from a Canon 5D mk III and the 24-70/2.8L II if you are interested to download and check. The zip-file is 112MB. The file will be available to 31 of October 2012.

Lenses / Re: Canon 24-70/2.8L II is official delayed - again
« on: September 04, 2012, 04:03:03 PM »
Scandinavian Photo,, in Sweden have shipped my 24-70/2.8L II today! So the information that I received from Canon was in error.

Unfortunately, an misunderstanding the 24-70 is not shipped to me  :-[

Explain yourself Human!

I received information from the company that my lens was shipped. But they have not received any lenses yet.

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5