August 02, 2014, 01:47:34 AM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Pieces Of E

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 10
31
Oh, and if you've misplaced the lens hood on your EF 600 L IS, then here's a replacement. It's only $932.10!   :o

http://www.cameracanada.com/enet-cart/product.asp?pid=2706A002



32
Videography Technique / Re: Post Processing Software for Video
« on: February 10, 2014, 11:11:40 AM »
Triggyman, take a look at Adobe Premiere Elements version 12. It's a scaled down version of Premiere which is a pretty robust application for someone just learning. I think you'll find Elements to work well as you learn. It's also only $99 US and I don't believe it's in the subscription model that Adobe has for it's flagship products either.

33
Business of Photography/Videography / Re: Sequential numbering watermark
« on: February 04, 2014, 01:40:02 PM »
For content that is covered by intellectual property rights, like photos and videos (IP content), you specifically give us the following permission, subject to your privacy and application settings: you grant us a non-exclusive, transferable, sub-licensable, royalty-free, worldwide license to use any IP content that you post on or in connection with Facebook (IP License).


Close enough to keep me from putting my hard work up for free. ::)

34
DD, early in this post, you said you had the camera only 30 days(which you should have contacted B&H immediately), now you call it a 3 month old camera, being at Canon for less than a month which means you are not telling the truth about it's actual age. Also, you should have copied your video onto a CD and not a CF card and they might have taken a look at it. You also didn't tell us which Canon repair facility you sent the 6D to. I hope you got your camera fixed or replaced for all you've been through, but your story doesn't jive.

35
Business of Photography/Videography / Re: Sequential numbering watermark
« on: February 04, 2014, 10:22:48 AM »
Gareth, you do realize that once you post your photos on FB, they become the property of FB right? You might want to read the fine print on their Terms of Policy or whatever it's called. Good luck.

36
Animal Kingdom / Re: Osprey
« on: December 19, 2013, 04:00:34 PM »
Awesome shot!   :)

37
EOS-M / Re: EOS M video gear
« on: December 19, 2013, 03:07:12 PM »
Ahh, sama, please forgive me. I thought you were actually going to use this equipment to shoot video(as your post implies). You were just buying it to play with, such as a toy. Sorry for the confusion. It is cute, with those wheels and all. Happy playing!  ;)

38
Site Information / Re: front page is now without ads :-D
« on: December 18, 2013, 03:01:49 PM »
And I just saw a hot, animated babe game GIF ad called League of Angels playing on the recent EOS-M post page. Quite entertaining I might add too!  ;)

39
EOS-M / Re: EOS M video gear
« on: December 18, 2013, 02:57:38 PM »
Okay, now show us some video from your fancy new rig please.

40
Reviews / Re: Review: EOS M System
« on: October 15, 2013, 06:56:01 PM »
Sorry if I snarkily insulted you Dustin, I do hope you'll forgive me. I gues it was un-professional of me to insult a fellow New Yorker. I bought my M full original price to shoot video only. My 7D is just fine shooting stills and I'm strong enough to lug it around all day long. The piece of crap M sits on a shelf, lifeless, what a waste of money. The pathetic AF is horrible unless you're shooting a still or slow moving object of considerable size. I even popped my $2500 70-200 white monster on it and it couldn't find the object I pointed it at. My business partner is curious to see how it works with LensBaby lenses. Good luck there.
Keep up the great work man and don't take me seriously, I tend to be critical at times, my bad. Sorry again.

41
Reviews / Re: Review: EOS M System
« on: October 15, 2013, 12:01:10 PM »
Yeah, awesome. 3 important points here:

"I typically post them in conjunction with a comment on either functionality or a lens combination not really addressed in the review.  The pictures are typically processed because I am just posting links to pictures that I have shared on Flickr that reflect my view/brand in the marketplace (one that has served me well, I might add). "  So you're just using the forum to showcase your work.

"This particular review has had very little discussion" I wonder why?

"interest in the camera when it went on the firesale has diminished for the present." Ya think? It's only been out for 16 months.

How's the autofocus in video mode on moving objects, like an animal moving across the plane of vision?

42
Reviews / Re: Review: EOS M System
« on: October 15, 2013, 10:03:32 AM »
I'm a bit confused. Are we supposed to comment on the images or the heavily post processed use of filters and HDR here?  ::)

43
Pricewatch Deals / Re: Photo Contrast: Contrast in Black & White
« on: October 11, 2013, 01:35:54 PM »
Many thoughtful kudos to our CanonRumours guy for making sure that we would retain all rights to any photos entered in the contest. Very cool!  :)

44
Software & Accessories / Re: Is Facebook worth it?
« on: September 30, 2013, 11:21:50 AM »
It is my understanding that once you upload your hard earned images to facebook, they become property of facebook. Also, if you upload some nice large hi-res copies of your images, then your new 'friends' can just "Right-Click, Save As" to their computer and now they don't need you anymore, much less are they even gonna think about BUYING the image they just stole. Just thinkin' here.... ::)

45
Pricewatch Deals / Re: Can this 7D package be worth over $9500?
« on: September 09, 2013, 03:33:54 PM »
"A fool and his money are soon parted". That ad is rediculous and the products within aren't even labled for authenticity. "Run Forest, Run!"  Oh boy, the 75-300 is in there...crap lens

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 10