January 31, 2015, 04:22:57 PM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - EchoLocation

Pages: 1 ... 6 7 [8] 9 10 ... 21
106
i feel like I just ordered an RX1 lite! This camera is the perfect opportunity to test just how useful a 35mm f2 fixed lens camera is! I've been drooling over the RX1 for a while and I think this just may tide me over until a FF RX1/EOSM comes out!
Also, I just looked, and is there really only 2 lenses available for this system? How has Canon not made anything else to offer customers? I know I haven't seen one announced, but it's still surprising that there is zero wide angle or telephoto choices in the lens lineup, or pretty much zero of anything besides the 18-55 and 22mm.

107
just bit. going to trade in the wife's 550D to someone for the EOS-M and 22MM. I feel like this will be a lot more enjoyable to carry around town on a daily basis for daytime shots or just for random events.
Not having a flash bothers me a little for casual group shots of friends and stuff, but I figure if I really hate it I can just sell it and probably even come out ahead.
Thanks for heads up Admin... love checking your site everyday!
and..... may the next M be Full Frame!!!!

108
EOS Bodies / Re: Canon EOS 70D Announced
« on: July 02, 2013, 12:10:50 AM »
The specs look good and the price is $100 bucks cheaper than I guessed. Not too bad at all. If I was looking for an APS-C body, i'd definitely be interested in this. I'm very curious to see this 20.2MP sensor in action and check out it's low light ISO performance.
Still of note, no mention of any weather sealing or AFMA, however I think this was pretty wishful thinking considering we got 7FPS and finally got rid of the 9/11pt AF system of the 60D/Rebels.
I just wish this camera had been the 60D, as I always saw that as a pretty big disappointment and totally unexciting.
This finally seems like a real upgrade from the 50D!

109
EOS Bodies / Re: Canon EOS 70D Spec List [CR3]
« on: June 30, 2013, 10:34:53 AM »
If true, this is extremely surprising and rather awesome. Not too much to complain about on this list in terms of a 70D. I'd guess it comes in at $1299.
To be honest though, nothing short of an EOS-M sized camera with a FF sensor would get me too excited. My gear is good enough that having a smaller size and weight is the only improvement that I can actually claim to need.

110
PowerShot Cameras / Re: Canon Working on Large Sensor Compacts?
« on: June 29, 2013, 12:57:19 PM »
ok, to start out, I really really really wanted to believe this rumor, but after reading the comments and the more recent post I think this is likely untrue and the explanation seems legit.
That being said, I go away for 2 days, and there isn't even 2 pages of responses to a large sensor compact rumor? I thought this would have at least 5 pages of replies, if not 18 like the 70D rumor. For me, the release of some RX1 competition, especially one with an interchangeable lens would be about the best thing possible. I'm getting ready to sell a lot of my gear and probably move down to something smaller and lighter since i'm planning to travel for a while soon, and a FF EOS-M like camera would be about the best thing ever. Carrying heavy DSLR's all day and huge, heavy lenses just isn't that appealing to me.

Last camera?? How so? I thought my 550D was my "last camera" and then bought two more. In 5yrs time who knows what tech will be available!

This doesn't apply to gear collectors :) This and the next generation of cameras (7D2/D400) have reached a point that improvements will be small, and hard to see for most people. The next generation of Full Frame cameras will be hard to top.
this is a ridiculous comment, and will almost definitely guarantee to be laughable in about 5 years. there is no way the camera industry will fail to find a way to sell cameras to more people in the future. if nothing else, they will find a way to sell people DSLR quality sensors and AF systems(with increased ISO performance) in smaller, lighter bodies. Guaranteed.

111
Lenses / Re: New Wide Angles Lenses in 2013 [CR2]
« on: June 20, 2013, 10:38:16 PM »
i love this rumor. if the 14-24 accepts filters I may be interested if it's priced under $2500.
I'm really interested in this 16-50 if it is sharp and around $1300 or less. I had the 17-40 but it was really soft, so I sold it. That extra 10mm of reach gives this lens a big advantage over pretty much anything else on the market(for full frame.) I can't think of anything else available for full frame that goes from that wide to that long(anybody?)
This 16-50 could be an awesome everyday sorta lens for people who appreciate the 24 side of the 24-70 more than the 70. I'm just not sure I could give up my 2.8 aperture for it.
Still, it is exciting to think about.

112
Site Information / Re: banning people for nothing at canon rumors
« on: June 16, 2013, 02:30:08 AM »
maybe he called someone a moron once(is that really that wrong?)
Of course it is "that wrong" ::) ... one can disagree with everyone and everything in CR but one has to learn to be civil ... "Be Civil" is one of the rules of this forum ... read point 4 here http://www.canonrumors.com/forum/index.php?topic=1442.0 ... we do not come to CR to be insulted by other members calling us names ... so of course it is wrong to call someone a moron ::)
Has anyone given any evidence to why he was banned besides just saying he was a "jerk" or he disagreed with people?
As it was clearly mentioned before, by the Admin, that if the banned person contacts the CR admin, the issue can be sorted out. But if the person who got banned has no interest in sorting out the issue, there is absolutely no reason whatsoever to provide "evidence" to someone else.
but all too often this forum is just a bunch of people agreeing with each other, slapping each others backs, and generally just cheering on Canon...
Nothing wrong with that ... after all it is Canon Rumors not Nikon/Sony rumors ... so people will cheer for Canon ... fyi, CR has plenty of threads/posts where people disagree all the time, maybe you just don't notice it ... hint, the subject thread is one of the many ;)
When someone has a little edgier opinion, or might have a little less cordiality, they are often treated like some kind of criminal.
Nobody is treated like a criminal because they have "a little edgier opinion". But if someone feels victimized because they are supposedly "treated like some kind of criminal" they have the option of reporting to the admin/mods and they also have the option of not being here ::)
1st: i'm not saying calling someone a moron is right or OK, i'm just asking if calling someone a moron is grounds for being banned from the site? I don't think the forum should be filled with people insulting each other, but if someone throws out the word moron in an argument once I don't think that they should be forever banned(or even temporarily banned, maybe given a warning?) There is also a difference between saying "you are a moron" and saying "that statement is moronic"
2nd: while there is nothing wrong with people being huge cheerleaders of Canon here, there is also nothing wrong with people not being huge cheerleaders of Canon. This forum is called "canonrumors" not "canoncheerleaders"
If all I wanted was to read about how good Canon things are, i could just read the press releases. I come to sites like this to get a balanced opinion from all sides. Going back to my first point, often times people (especially some of this sites biggest users) are all too excited to belittle and insult people's intelligence for disagreeing with the consensus or criticizing things(as was stated much earlier in this thread.)
3rd: This squirrel thing is cute, but I think this thread is rather serious, and I haven't really seen many answers still as to why this person was banned. It seems like people just want to waste people's time rather than give constructive information or debate.

113
Site Information / Re: banning people for nothing at canon rumors
« on: June 16, 2013, 01:00:44 AM »
Now, that squirrel is the best post on this thread  :D

Totally agree, and for some strange reason they look smarter than the ones we have, probably speak "American" though.

This, from someone who's loo flushes backwards. Sheesh.  ;)
this is a myth... i'm surprised you fell for this neuro.


i didn't finish reading the 7 pages of the thread, but I don't see why Canon F1 got banned.... maybe he called someone a moron once(is that really that wrong?)
maybe he disagreed with a mod(who cares?)

Has anyone given any evidence to why he was banned besides just saying he was a "jerk" or he disagreed with people? He may not have been the nicest guy in the internet, but all too often this forum is just a bunch of people agreeing with each other, slapping each others backs, and generally just cheering on Canon...
When someone has a little edgier opinion, or might have a little less cordiality, they are often treated like some kind of criminal.
Unless some good evidence is put forward(or i missed something) i dont see why F1 was banned....
I don't think disagreeing with people or upsetting some random members every so often is much of a justification.

114
EOS-M / Re: EF-M 11-22 / 4-5.6 IS STM - officially announced
« on: June 06, 2013, 11:05:35 AM »
i like this. if the image quality is really on par with the 10-22 ef-s than this is a real winner at 400 bucks and a lot smaller. with the 2.3 faster AF potentially coming, the M series is starting to sound a lot more tempting. I just wish Canon would just make a full frame eos-M.

115
the white tape on the camera and stamps are just ridiculous. A thief will not care if you have a 20D or 1DX... like others have said, they're probably looking to get about 50 dollars for it anyways, so what's the difference?
If anything the white tape is going to attract a lottttt more attention. I wouldn't stop staring at you if I saw you on the street, i'd be thinking to myself, "what does this guy have going on under that tape? what's in the rest of his bag?"
This solution doesn't make your camera look old and cheap, it makes it look like some kind of prototype test copy(besides kai.)
I think this thread has gone from semi useful, to downright ridiculous.
just get insurance, use common sense, act like you belong, and know when to give up if confronted(as said before.) I'd say the taping is just going to give you unwanted attention.

116
Lenses / Re: Downgrading my equipment - looking for advice
« on: May 21, 2013, 10:54:51 PM »
sorry to hear about your fall, i hope you feel better soon. best of luck.
yeah, i'm a little confused too. if you are talking about "reducing and downsizing" i don't really see how any 1 series body could be considered.
are you trying to reduce on price, size, complexity, etc.?
if i was trying to reduce or downgrade on price i'd probably just buy a mirrorless aps-c body. If so i'd look at the fuji(with the f2.8-4 kit lens), nex, or if you want Canon, the EOS-M. If you want something good enough and simple, you might look at one of the new fixed lens aps-c like the Ricoh GR or the Nikon Coolpix A.
If you just want one great and simple option why not the RX1 from Sony?
Otherwise i'd just keep the 5DIII and the 24-105, or even switch to a 24-70 f4(cant believe I just said that!)
the 5DIII is an awesome camera and you've had amazing lenses, I think you'll be disappointed if you try to go for the cheap zooms.
I'd say stick with what you have, buy primes, or switch to a much smaller system(think nex, eos-m, or even RX1.)

117
Reviews / Re: Review - Canon EF 300mm f/2.8L IS II
« on: May 16, 2013, 02:45:15 AM »
To make it up to you, here's a photo of a duck I took:
this made my day! you didn't have to make anything up to me(i really liked your review,) but i still appreciate your free duck picture!

118
Canon General / Re: Announcement: Canon EF 200-400 f/4L IS 1.4x
« on: May 14, 2013, 10:40:24 AM »
wow... just got home from dinner(live in China.) I cant believe this is actually announced.
seems to be basically what we expected. It defiinitely seems awesome, but I'm never going to buy one.

119
incredible if this is true.
what are we going to talk about now?

120
announcement?
this thing was on a tour of photo shows around the world. I got an email hyping it being on display at either the HK or Shanghai camera show at least six months ago. I know they also had it on display at other camera shows in different countries as well.
At this point, the announcement means little besides just confirming weight, some random specs and price.
I'm sure someday it will be in the hands of actual consumers, but at this point it's basically a joke/Yeti.

Pages: 1 ... 6 7 [8] 9 10 ... 21