« on: December 16, 2014, 08:36:35 PM »
I think they'll make a replacement foot soon.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
I would go with Fuji X series + native lenses.
The term "laggard" is not sarcasm, it's social science and as "discussing things" as it goes! The diffusion of innovations is well researched, I should know, I wrote my diploma about it :-) ... for the basics see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diffusion_of_innovations
It's about different kinds of people adopting new technology and trickling down this information via social channels - the very thing that's happening right now right here. Innovation can stop at any time, not everything is adopted or replaces the old tech entirely.
Unsurprisingly, this Canon forum follows the Canon brand design - it's rather conservative and definitely isn't a stronghold of innovators or even early adopters. This is neither a "good" or "bad" thing, just an observation and it explains the reluctance about new camera designs. Heck, even Magic Lantern isn't widespread among Canon users even if its features beats most other camera systems out there.
As for the comics: Well, I can't help it, discussions on CR aren't exactly a serious issue for me and some situations simply remind me of a Simpsons scene. Though I hope they help to lighten the mood a bit :-)
That's interesting stuff but as with all specialisms it's dangerous to take a word in common usage and attribute some specific, objective quantity to it and then expect to be understood. A laggard in common parlance is still simply "a person who makes slow progress and falls behind others". That's not appropriate here as most of us are well ahead of the average when it comes to digital photography, the techniques it involves and up to date tech. I think that must be a fundamental flaw in using that term to this audience in any sense.
And blindly following "innovation" is not a good thing either as our history proves in spades. I work in IT, and I know that early adopters have quality issues. I'm happy to let them get on with it, seek out the best and then run along afterwards protecting the many thousands of users we serve from nightmare scenarios that others regularly walk into. We give better service as a result. There's simply no question about it in my mind.
ML - I like the idea but as an ex-software developer I would not be an early adopter if they ever make it available for the 70D. As I've said in the past, I value reliability, the achievement of which takes significant innovation and investment. I have no problem with open source but sadly their excellent project has obvious problems and it would be foolish to risk my camera and / or scarce photography time even for the kind of improvements it offers.
You might see all that as "conservative" but certainly I think it's a long distance from "laggard". I don't really mind either way; I believe I will make the most progress with my photography in this manner rather than chasing the latest thing that will make it "easy" which is what a lot of what we are talking about involves.
It is all about perspective and how tight you want to take the photo.Not sure I get it. I guess it's because of the Wimberley II design? I use a RRS PG-02 LLR side-mount gimbal, as long as I position the 600's barrel over a tripod leg, the body is between the other two legs when going vertically, and I don't think removing a removable grip would matter.QuoteOften when I am using my 600 f4 on my Wimbley I will remove the grip so I have more verticle reach.
You're right on the gimbal thing: I have a 7D2 on a gimbal and its lightness helps. I can't imagine putting a 1-body on that thing for extended shooting.
As for the weight of the body, when the load is properly balanced on the gimbal, the whole rig can be easily moved with a fingertip, whether I have my 1D X or my EOS M behind the 600 II.
For a moment I was wondering who shoots tennis matches with 600mm fixed...
Those who aren't lucky enough to get a press pass.
In that case, perhaps we should discuss the validity of the 7DII rumors from 2012, three years (approx) after the 7D was released...and the two more years that elapsed prior to the actual announcement of the 7DII.The approx 3 year product cycle was assumed for the 7D based on those used by other single digit bodies.