Now I know how crazy I'd look shooting with the M.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
I guess it is more an issue of priority. I think the 35L is a pretty reliable piece of kit and has plenty of potential left in it to satisfy most photographers needs.Why? Does canon really need to replace these lenses? they are not that old.
The 35mmL was introduced in 1998. Its not exactly a new lens,1996 EF 180mm f/3.5L Macro USM.Yes! This would be nice. Canon is short on long macro lenses (short on long!?). It would be nice if they could pull the minimum focus to around the level of the 100L, while also improving the bokeh above 5.6, perhaps with 9 blades instead of the current 8.