March 02, 2015, 02:32:11 AM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - mememe

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5
Lenses / Re: TS-E 45mm & TS-E 90mm Finally Getting Replaced? [CR1]
« on: March 15, 2013, 02:17:04 PM »
Why not make the 45mm ts-e faster? If you can make a 90mm ts-e f/2.8 you can make a 45mm ts-e f/2 or 1.8
To make it even more expensive? The new one will probably be at about 2300$. If you like it faster it would be at 3800 i guess...

Canon General / Re: The Canon EOS 7D & EF 400 f/2.8L IS II Break a Record
« on: February 23, 2013, 03:16:24 PM »
Nothing special anymore nowadays

Technical Support / Re: 5dm3 AFMA Focal results
« on: December 21, 2012, 03:30:29 PM »
Can someone do this with a really new Lens? (70-200 2.8 II or 24-70 II)?

There was a Rumor that Canon changed Autofocus algorithms and Focus is now checked after focussing and corrected if not perfect (u can see this when the Lens does a tiny step after the first fast and large one). But it works only with new Lenses and Cameras (rumor said so)

Lenses / Re: EF 24-70 f/2.8L IS Exists as a Working Prototype [CR2]
« on: December 20, 2012, 02:00:30 AM »
They just cant release that right now!

Why? They already gone the wrong way. They released the 24-70 II for the price that would fit better for the IS-Version of this lens. The IS-Version has have to be somewhat more expensive and that would be a Problem when comparing to the Tamron one now that the non IS II is priced like an IS one should be.

And since ppl buy the totally overpriced 24-70 II they just cant bring it now. I guess II will drop to the price of the old 24-70 and the IS will be about the price you pay for the II now.

Lenses / Re: Canon EF 50 f/1.4 IS in 2013 [CR2]
« on: December 13, 2012, 12:45:12 AM »
I dont think 50 1.4 IS will happen...

I really dont know why this appears here...

And to topic: Are the leica-lenses really that good?

Lenses / Re: Canon Rumors Reviews
« on: October 04, 2012, 02:14:18 PM »

Will our reviews differ from others?
We think so, our reviews are going to be short, to the point and show the performance of the lens

Photozone already does this. Best review-site ever!

But there is nothing bad about another review source.

EOS Bodies / Re: Canon EOS-1D C Available?
« on: August 25, 2012, 03:35:18 AM »
Is it just me or does this picture look like a really bad fake?

EOS Bodies / Re: Canon EOS 3D X [CR1]
« on: August 21, 2012, 11:57:39 AM »
No Eye-Control Focus????
.... NO never ever again! I say it everytime. Why ppl dont believe me?

EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: Digital Rev video review of 1D X available
« on: August 19, 2012, 02:23:13 PM »
Ah, the guy with the fake street shots :)

EOS Bodies / Re: Canon Rebel T4i/650 Recall (Again)
« on: August 15, 2012, 04:51:15 AM »
CANON IS BECOMING A JOKE! when it comes to new releases..!

Nothing new! Remember the bad Coatings of 5d hotmirrors? 5d loosing mirror? Or the 1dIII AF-Issue? 40D motor failures?

Is there noise added? The purple parts look very noisy for ISO200.

Light and composition is really nice done.

Lenses / Re: If you can have ONLY 3 lenses, what would they...???
« on: August 14, 2012, 12:32:43 PM »
Anything out of Canon lens park?

I would go with

24-70 II
70-200 II IS
600 4 II IS

Third Party Manufacturers / Re: A Small Sigma 180 f/2.8 OS Macro Issue
« on: August 11, 2012, 02:23:57 AM »
Looks like sigma always picks silly lens-IDs...
The illumination/vignetting correction doesnt work right at any non-canon lens...

Lenses / Re: Canon 50mm f/1.4 USM focus problem...
« on: August 09, 2012, 10:44:58 AM »
In near conditions the +20 dont make that much difference.

BUT. The 50 has a Focus shift! If you stop down the focus moves away from you. Keep that in mind! Maybe thats the problem?

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5