31
EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: The 5D Mark III & SD Memory Cards
« on: June 25, 2012, 11:23:06 AM »
Guys i can tell u why canon did this... Cause SD-Cars SUCK.
May 18, 2013, 06:00:32 AM
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
32
EOS Bodies / Re: 1D X Unboxing
« on: June 24, 2012, 06:58:08 AM »
Why is there no eye-piece installed?
33
Canon General / Re: Pancakes for Good - The Big Life Foundation Fundraiser
« on: June 07, 2012, 03:39:07 PM »
As far as i know i cant order at your preferred shop (BH) in Europe, right?
34
Lenses / Re: Canon EF 40mm f/2.8 STM Information.
« on: June 07, 2012, 11:21:56 AM »I need a physics lesson:
Why cant they put bigger glass in it, and make it pancake size 40mm F0.5 or similar?
I guess bigger glass means longer Lens
35
Lenses / Re: Canon EF 40mm f/2.8 STM Information.
« on: June 07, 2012, 11:19:28 AM »Forgive my ignorance, but what's special about this? It's only 10mm wider than the 50 and a stop slower.
Its small!
36
EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: 5D Mark III Reviews
« on: March 23, 2012, 12:29:08 PM »
Now look at the camera-lab test:
The Movie tests are strange. The III makes a darker image at the same settings as the mkII... Iso cheating eh?
The Movie tests are strange. The III makes a darker image at the same settings as the mkII... Iso cheating eh?
37
Lenses / Re: Help Please: Canon EF 50mm 1.2 Slow Focusing.
« on: March 11, 2012, 03:44:09 AM »
That check is not good!
You have the Cap on the lens... Your camera focusses slower in bad light! You only get full speed focus when you are in bright environment.
But its still normal for the 1.2...
Better check it for focus errors in the area under 1 Meter distance... Mine had a false focus at short distances and when i corrected it with focus adjustment (i had to set it to a huge value cause errors in short distance need that...) it was totally wrong on long distances... But they couldnt do anything about it... stopped down it was all ok but open there was this problem... It was just one cm or so but this is much when you shoot at 1.2...
You have the Cap on the lens... Your camera focusses slower in bad light! You only get full speed focus when you are in bright environment.
But its still normal for the 1.2...
Better check it for focus errors in the area under 1 Meter distance... Mine had a false focus at short distances and when i corrected it with focus adjustment (i had to set it to a huge value cause errors in short distance need that...) it was totally wrong on long distances... But they couldnt do anything about it... stopped down it was all ok but open there was this problem... It was just one cm or so but this is much when you shoot at 1.2...
38
Lenses / Re: Canon EF 24-70 f/2.8L II
« on: February 11, 2012, 02:33:33 PM »
I will never buy this... its really poor how the sunshade is implemented...
The old one is also sharp at any focal length... Field curvature was the only "problem" (not really as bad as with other lenses)
The old one is also sharp at any focal length... Field curvature was the only "problem" (not really as bad as with other lenses)
39
Lenses / Re: Canon EF 24-70 f/2.8L II
« on: February 11, 2012, 08:32:41 AM »
Does it change lenght when zooming? It would suck if the sunshade moves back and forward...
Field curvature gone?
Field curvature gone?
40
EOS Bodies / Re: 5D Split? 5D X & 5D Mark III [CR1]
« on: February 10, 2012, 02:59:20 AM »
... Oh oh oh...
I rate this CR0!
Its bollocks.
if it would be like you say the names would be the other way... X for less MP (like the 1dx) and 5dIII for high Megapixel...
But... Its NOT like the Rumor says...
I rate this CR0!
Its bollocks.
if it would be like you say the names would be the other way... X for less MP (like the 1dx) and 5dIII for high Megapixel...
But... Its NOT like the Rumor says...
41
Lenses / Re: Canon EF 28 f/2.8 IS USM
« on: February 07, 2012, 01:43:41 AM »
No EF-S... Good...
But 2.8? Naah. and really both 24 and 28.... somehow strange...
But 2.8? Naah. and really both 24 and 28.... somehow strange...
42
Lenses / Re: Canon EF 28 f/2.8 IS USM
« on: February 06, 2012, 12:06:45 PM »
This doesnt make sense for me! 24 and 28 at 2.8??? Why???
Maybe they renew all primes with is?
Maybe they renew all primes with is?
43
EOS Bodies / Re: New High-End DSLR Later in February [CR3]
« on: January 29, 2012, 01:11:43 PM »
Its funny... The CR3 is for NOT on FEB 7....
Hey i give you another CR3... Not on FEB 6 nor on FEB 8
Hey i give you another CR3... Not on FEB 6 nor on FEB 8
44
EOS Bodies / Re: *UPDATE* 5D Mark III - February 7, 2012 [CR2]
« on: January 28, 2012, 12:54:12 PM »
61pt AF
CR-Guy: Do you believe any S___ in your inbox?
This will NEVER HAPPEN!
CR-Guy: Do you believe any S___ in your inbox?
This will NEVER HAPPEN!
45
EOS Bodies / Re: 5D Mark III Sighting?
« on: January 23, 2012, 02:23:03 PM »
Canon: Announce it! Now! 