« on: February 06, 2014, 10:02:31 AM »
I would go for Sony RX10 instead.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
I don't see the point of a 135 f/2.8.
At the time of superlative sharp f/2.8 zoom lenses (24-70 II and 70-200 II), why would you buy a 135 that doesn't add anything "big" to your pics ? Maybe a tiny little bit sharpening ? Is it really worth it…? For me, it definitely ain't.
I don't believe those are 2200 mAh and I don't like batteries which someone sells with different charger (usually they are NOT decoded and the camera does not show battery level).
I got 2 of this: http://www.ebay.com/itm/2Pcs-Full-Coded-1250mAh-LP-E12-Battery-for-Canon-EOS-M-Camera-Show-Battery-Level-/170895464586?pt=Batteries_Chargers&hash=item27ca29d88a
They are working fine, I don't see any difference with the original battery.
Thanks, Dear noncho.
Thanks for another option for all EOS-M users. For 2200 mAh storage power, I just read on Amazon and Read at the label on the Batteries per the Photos that show in this post. I do not think that they lie to us, This Sell in USA, and Very dangerous to not tell the Truth. Up to this After noon I take 85 More Photos = 85 + 438 = 523 Photos so far, and Still Full Battery in one charge = Magic for me.