July 31, 2014, 05:47:25 AM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - noncho

Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7 8 ... 11
76
Third Party Manufacturers / Re: Tamron 150-500mm f/5-6.3 VC on Thursday
« on: November 06, 2013, 02:34:04 AM »
I can't say anything until we have real images from it.
For me 150-450 5.6 would be better. I have Sigma 100-300 F4 and it's a brilliant lens(even with 1.4 extender).
They have to made something which is at least good as Sigma and have stabilization. 

77
EOS-M / Re: Grip available for EOS M
« on: November 04, 2013, 05:02:08 PM »
I would rather check what what are the options for improvisation in my local hardware shop ;)

78
I'm much more interested in RX10, it's like upgraded Canon Pro1, series which everybody of the SLR makers are avoiding.

79
Reviews / Re: Review: EOS M System
« on: October 15, 2013, 04:15:43 PM »
It's about 2000 meters high and I was lucky :)

80
Reviews / Re: Review: EOS M System
« on: October 15, 2013, 03:16:43 PM »
Here is one for you with M + 18-55 IS STM - Transfagarasan, Romania:

It's great in terms of sharpness, I have made some contrast adjustments, but the clouds and everything else are real.

Extreme metal festival with M + 22mm? No problem - Alan Averill(Primordial):

 

81
I have YN565EX from more than a year and it's working fine.
I'm not using the flash too often, but I'm pretty happy with this one. Especially for 1/4th of the 580EX II price. 

82
Lenses / Re: Do you usually shoot your lenses wide open?
« on: October 01, 2013, 04:53:08 AM »
40 2.8 - usually 2.8-5.6
60 2.8 - 2.8-11
200 2.8 L II - 3.2-5.6, with 1.4 extender - 5.0-7.1
EF-M 22/2 - 2.0-4.0
EF-M 18-55 IS STM - 5.6-8.0

If I want to shot wide open usually 1/3 stop down is good for even for high quality primes.

83
Lenses / Re: EF 135 USM L or EF 100 Macro IS USM - which one is sharper?
« on: September 30, 2013, 06:22:51 AM »
Both are sharp enough, you should pick the most suitable for your needs.

84
EOS-M / Re: EOS M is built like a tank
« on: September 22, 2013, 01:05:03 PM »
EOS-M have good build quality - I have already dropped mine from a bench on the pavement. The result was just a scratch on the battery cap angle.

85
EOS-M / Re: The Next EOS M [CR2]
« on: September 03, 2013, 10:54:43 AM »
You are not the only one, I want 12mm pancake but after 11-22 IS I don't think we will see such wide pancakes soon.

P.S. 11, 44 and 88mm primes(pancakes) would be a great company for 22/2  :P

86
Lenses / Re: We want more EF-S lens
« on: August 24, 2013, 03:30:55 PM »
12 2.8 prime would be nice, 50-150 2.8 IS too.

87
PowerShot / Re: Canon PowerShot G16 Announced
« on: August 22, 2013, 10:34:41 AM »
Not a word about the crappy viewfinger, so it will be the same as in G15 - unusable for me
I prefer no viewfinger than unusable.
24mm wide would be nice too, actually for this type of compact camera 24-200 2.8 range on 1/1.7 is better than 28-100 with bigger sensor like RX100.
 

88
EOS-M / Re: Some EOS M Information [CR1]
« on: August 20, 2013, 04:12:53 AM »
I'm interested in macro lens for M, I have EF-s 60 macro and the same with IS for M would be great.
Telephoto zoom... well, I prefer 70-100mm small prime for portraits and street. Something like Pentax 70 2.4(small, great image quality). Telephoto zoom - 50-150 F4 would be better than 50-200 5.6.


89
Lenses / Re: Canon 40mm or High-End Compact?
« on: August 16, 2013, 05:08:22 AM »
EOS M + 22 is almost like compact camera.
40 pancake is great, but you need small body to feel it compact(SL1, 700D) :)

90
Sigma can make a hit with some affordable super-tele lenses  8)
400/4 would be great, 500 5.6 would be nice. They can renew 300 2.8 and 500 4.5, actually smaller and lighter 400/4.5 may not be a bad idea too.
50-500, 150-500 and 120-400 zooms could be improved.

Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7 8 ... 11