October 22, 2014, 10:27:33 AM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - noncho

Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7 8 ... 13
Lenses / Re: The 10 Oldest Canon Lenses in Production
« on: January 10, 2014, 02:44:02 AM »
I have 100/2 and 200/2.8 and they NEED replacement - 100 have horrible purple fringing, 200 needs IS.

PowerShot / Re: Canon PowerShot SX600 HS Official
« on: January 06, 2014, 03:34:41 PM »
Digic 4+ is old, F6.9 is ridiculous

Canon General / Re: Are Metal Mounts Better Than Plastic?
« on: January 04, 2014, 01:16:31 PM »
The weather sealing part was awesome :D
I'm going for some tape to make my lens sealed too...

Canon General / Re: Review - Canon EF 85mm f/1.8
« on: January 01, 2014, 01:04:51 PM »
For FF there are good options, but I really miss good small 60-70 1.4 EF-S or EF-M...

Canon General / Re: Review - Canon EF 85mm f/1.8
« on: December 30, 2013, 11:31:16 AM »
The problem with this lens is purple fringing, CA too. This is the main reason why Canon needs to upgrade it (and 100/2), they are 20+ years old and should be updated for digital cameras.

Lenses / Re: Patent: 16-120mm f/3.5-5.6 IS STM
« on: December 29, 2013, 09:51:24 AM »
16-120 sounds interesting but I am more interested in
(1) a f/4.0 zoom, e.g. 15-75mm with GREAT IQ and a
(2) f/2.0 40mm compact lens (with telephoto construction to minimize size) with GREAT IQ, IS and a good close focus capability (1:4 would be sufficient for most purposes).

But that's just my "needs" ...

Me too...
Add 80/2 and more interesting telephoto than 50-200 5.6.
Too much wishes for the new year...

I hope this will never come back, it was awful...

Third Party Manufacturers / Re: A 40mm f/0.85 for Your EOS-M?
« on: December 14, 2013, 03:45:27 PM »
The good news here for me is that 3rd party are starting to consider M(Samyang 10 2.8 was announced for M too).
Small and cheap 40 1.4 would be great

EOS Bodies / Re: EOS 5D Mark III & Third Party Batteries
« on: December 13, 2013, 01:01:35 AM »
Corners have been cut?

Canon are producing probably millions of those batteries, the price for producing them is 100% under 5$ for each.
I have 60D and the Canon battery in my country costs around 100$, I got not genuine one for 13$ on ebay two years ago and it's serving me well for a spare. If the third parties can have profit for such amount of money for the end user, Canon have to be shamed. What's the difference, Canon's are not hand made by extremely qualified Japanese engineers and don't have to cost so much.   

EOS Bodies / Re: EOS 5D Mark III & Third Party Batteries
« on: December 12, 2013, 10:20:21 AM »
Don't try little tricks Canon - just make your batteries more affordable. LP-E6 is old enough, if you sell it for 25-30$ nobody will think about 3rd parties and your profit will be very good.
Sometimes I'm wondering what marketing specialists do they have...

Pricewatch Deals / Re: Deal: EOS 70D Body $949 at B&H Photo
« on: December 11, 2013, 06:26:37 AM »
It's the same scenario as with 60D, next summer will be constantly below 1000$

But yes - this is a good price now.

EOS Bodies / Re: A New EOS M with EVF Second Half of 2014?
« on: December 09, 2013, 10:15:11 AM »
Now that sounds much better about the future of M :)

I was going to purchase EF-M 11-22 IS STM soon, but if the Canon don't want to make more lenses and leave the system with small enhancements just for Asian market I'm not quite sure...
Maybe it's time to look for another mirrorless system before I got too deep in hopeless system.

EOS Bodies / Re: Canon EOS M2 Specs Revealed?
« on: December 02, 2013, 04:07:24 PM »
I have M, for M2 I would like:
Faster and better tracking AF, bigger grip, more FPS... New sensor will not make miracles for me.
BUT - I need more great little primes for this system!

EOS Bodies / Re: Canon abandoned EOS M?
« on: December 02, 2013, 04:06:21 PM »

Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7 8 ... 13