July 23, 2014, 10:42:44 PM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - simonxu11

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 16
16
EOS Bodies / Re: Canon EOS-b Images Leak & a New Kit Lens
« on: March 19, 2013, 10:22:07 PM »
What's the point of this camera, just because they cannot release anything competitive in the mirrorless market, so they reduce the size and the weight of their dslr??
Maybe Canon has a point, they know their fanboz love whatever they come out as long as it can mount ef lens

17
EOS Bodies / Re: Canon EOS 100D Detailed Specs Appear
« on: March 18, 2013, 01:22:28 AM »
yawn~~~~~~~~~

18
EOS Bodies / Re: Canon EOS 6D Firmware by June? [CR1]
« on: March 08, 2013, 08:05:49 AM »
CANON's recent strategy~~!!
Cripple some functions at first,
Competitor offers something better
An ANNOUCEMENT for a FIRMWARE
Loyal users still love CANON

19
Another development announcement .......lol........where's the 200-400 f4 IS 1.4x which they announced two years ago ::) ::)

20
EOS Bodies / Re: Canon EOS 7D Mark II Spec List [CR2]
« on: February 21, 2013, 09:05:21 AM »
Love the ironies...

And its so ironic, too...we bitch about having AA filters....they bitch about NOT having them. We bitch about having too many fps...they bitch about none of their cameras competing with the 7D line.

Ah, the ironies. SO MANY IRONIES!


in terms of price, FPS, the 7100 seems more on-par with an x0D than a 7d. Especially if it's a pentamirror VF instead of a pentaprism... which as neuro pointed out, is more xx0 than x0. Higher MP, sure, but that's what Nikon's all about, isn't it? I feel like this doesn't put that much pressure on an upcoming 7d2


How come it's pentamirror,it says pentaprism on Nikon official website
http://www.nikon.com.au/en_AU/product_details.page?DCRPath=templatedata/en_AU/saleable_product_information/data/Digital%20SLR%20Cameras/D7100.xml&currentProductTab=3&CategoryID=gp11zkm9

So you guys believe the future X0D will have 100% VF, two SD slots, similar AF from flagship model, 1080i 60??

21
EOS Bodies / Re: EOS not good for NASA?
« on: February 12, 2013, 10:23:21 PM »
But how does one explain some of the pictures taken from the space station with a 1200mm lens?
Nikon had 1200mm f11 and 1200mm-1700mm f5.6-8

22
Lenses / Re: DXOMark Reviews the Canon EF 35mm f/2 IS
« on: February 07, 2013, 09:16:10 PM »
Good marks on DXO, front page on CR

23
EOS Bodies / Re: Official DXOMark Sensor Score for the EOS-1D X
« on: November 01, 2012, 07:03:53 AM »

24
EOS Bodies / Re: Red AF in AI-Servo fixed in 1D-X before 5D Mk III
« on: October 18, 2012, 07:20:14 AM »
If you read the 1D X threads the red AF is not really what many users were hoping for, there is talk of "Disco Lights" and other things, so maybe you should feel grateful you haven't got it!! ;-)
That's why canon should put it into 5D3 first, get all the feedbacks. It's not such a good idea to let flagship's users to test this function.

25
EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: Canon EOS-1D X DXOMark Sensor Scores
« on: October 11, 2012, 08:12:42 AM »
i guess for some the reputation of the DXOmark has just become a bit better.   ::)
;D ;D
I think this is the first time admin put Canon's DXO mark on the front page

26
EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: Canon EOS-M Begins Shipping
« on: October 05, 2012, 09:12:01 AM »
Why do people pre-order such an ordinary camera? They will be made in their millions.

Anyway, reason I am posting is because anyone thinking of getting this camera should read engadget's review here:

http://www.engadget.com/2012/10/03/canon-eos-m-review/

Enjoy.

Thanks for posting this
The IQ seems on par with 650D (no surprise), but the AF is huge let down.

Engadget:

"This time around, with our store-bought final model, we weren't able to test it alongside any of the company's tried-and-true heavy hitters, but both EF-Ms indeed fell far short. It's not the most sluggish focusing we've seen, but it's darn close."

"Professional photographers can affix their pricey L lenses, which is nice, but the dismal focusing performance means SLRs will probably be far more appealing to these users. "

27
Third Party Manufacturers / Re: 6D Need To Change Something..
« on: October 05, 2012, 08:51:59 AM »
Canon 6D Has Superb ISO Sensitivity...

Not sure about the high ISO performance of 6D, but the D600 is outstanding.
Has anyone checked the D600's preview on DPreview, the high ISO performance is better than 5D3 in RAW
http://www.dpreview.com/previews/nikon-d600/8

29
EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: Canon EOS-M Begins Shipping
« on: October 02, 2012, 12:31:42 PM »

Too little and way too late!! I already have a Sony NEX-5n, a great sensor (better than the EOS 7D) hadicapped by a lousy lens selection. It will soon be replaced by either a Fuji X-E1 (great sensor, good lens selection  :) ) or an Olympus OM-D E-5M (good sensor, great lens selection :)  :) ). Sorry Canon, the horse is already out of the barn. You snooz you looz, simple as that.
Yep, cannot agree more.
I sold my nex 5n a few months ago, the replacement will be the nex 6 or the Fuji XE1.

30
EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: Canon EOS-M Begins Shipping
« on: October 02, 2012, 10:21:11 AM »
I think the two most important questions will be answered when reviews start coming out:

1) How quickly and accurately does it focus?
2) How good (optically) is the 22mm f/2?

But above those two is a question only Canon can answer:

1) Where are the other lenses for the system? / Where's the road map?

http://www.mirrorlessrumors.com/canon-repeats-no-plan-to-make-any-pro-mirrorless-camera/
http://www.mirrorlessrumors.com/canon-about-the-eos-m-future-no-camera-with-built-in-evf-and-no-lens-roadmap/
According to a few youtube videos, the AF is quite slow. IMO Canon just want to prevent current EOS users from buying other brands when mirrorless coming into their minds, because they can mount whatever canon lens onto this one. That's the only selling point, other than that the EOS M seems a generation behind others.

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 16