September 21, 2014, 10:23:17 AM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - Viggo

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 137
Hi I live in Victoria Australia and purchased a Canon 1DX but all is not well, the camera shuts down telling me to recharge the battery but the battery that came with the camera is fully charged, I went back to the supplier of the camera and he sold me another battery to see if the problem is the one that came with the camera from canon, I charged the new battery and installed it in my new !DX, but the problem exists I believe in the camera being faulty, I have been using Fuji cameras for the past few years without any issues and traded my Fuji as a deposit payment for my new canon, I took the camera back to the place of purchase here in Melbourne and they said it must be returned to canon for repairs, so I looked across the web for more of the same problems as I have got with mine, to my surprise I came across a professional in new south wales that took canon to court over his new 1DX and lost the court case. is this what's happen when you get a lemon, also when formatting a new SanDisk sd card it now does not work even in my PC . what would you do.
the link below is from the NSW court case that canon refused to fix.
Canon warranty dispute leads to claims of fraud

1dX does not use SD cards.

It's not a case to take to court. Why did he SELL you a new battery? that's ridiculous. If the camera is faulty when you buy it, it's just to return and get a replacement, do not take the argument with the store if they want one. You call Canon and clear it out first, and just swap to a new camera. If it's different rules than here and there is no such thing as d.o.a time, simply send it in for repair and tell Canon you want a new one, not to repair a brand new product.

All I can say is that sh!t happens, and it's most likely solved with some patience, and you'll get a working one to use hard for many years.

1D X Sample Images / Re: Any Thing shot with a 1Dx
« on: August 03, 2014, 10:01:19 AM »

But Dave is really missing the point, this is not, predominantly, an image centric forum, it is a gear centric forum where most people come to see and talk gear and are photography geeks who enjoy the equipment as much as the image making, and there is absolutely nothing wrong with that as far as I am concerned. If you want more stunning images than you can believe go to 500px, or Flickr.

I  am obviously missing the point totally as we are talking about Canon's top of the range body, the topic is " any thing shot with a 1DX " and you say that image making is not what it's all about. My original observation was that someone passed comment on another 1DX 's owners approach to photography and yet the shots they posted were , well let's just say, not good and that's being generous.

Thanks :) Appreciate your opinion. You've completely missed the point, but that's okay.

Share some images that I can use as an inspiration. I obviously need it.

I have yet to see a modifier that can fake being bigger than it is.

I've seen modifiers that are more effective than others, aka how much light comes out, but never seen a small light give softness like a big light from the same distance. Only marketing can rule the laws of physics.

Canon General / Re: What is your Least Used Piece of Gear?
« on: August 01, 2014, 02:13:52 AM »
It's funny to see just how different purposes we have with our photography. I too use my backpack only for storage at home, lift it only to vacuum under, lol. And one of my absolutely most used items is flash, as in OCF through soft box that is.

Canon General / Re: What is your Least Used Piece of Gear?
« on: July 31, 2014, 04:04:53 PM »
Sold my Sekonic meter and my Spyder LensCal yesterday help fund an item I hope will be MUCH used.

I also had a few tripods that never got used. Monopods never used. Grey card. Gel holder for the 600 RT etc. lol and I have two cases full of useless items, like the Ricoh R10 I won once.

Lenses / Re: Canon EF 50 f/1.2L Goes Missing at Canon Germany
« on: July 31, 2014, 10:47:03 AM »
I hope they bring back the f/1.0 - just sharper!

+1...without focus shift. Sharp from wide open to f2.8

Sharp ... you mean like how the Sigma 50/1.4 Art is sharp? Or sharp as in how the 50/1.2L is sharp?

Sharper than 85L II @ f1.2 and no AF issues like ART

And with amazing bokeh like the 50/1.0L, not like the Sigma 50/1.4 Art.

I'll take the bokeh of the 50 Art over the 1.0 L any day..

Canon General / Re: What do you Cheap Out On?
« on: July 29, 2014, 04:12:19 AM »
I cheap out on a lot ! I hardly ever buy a new lens, always used and I haggle like a pro. I have always bought the cheapest soft boxes and modifiers for my flashes, absolutely done with that, because they're useless.

I used to buy the cheapest of all accessories like triggers and filters (not protectors) but found it only ends up costing much more than I planned due to them not meeting my requirements.

First thing I cheaped out on was buying the first Tamron 18-200 DiII for mye first dslr, the 350D. I used it for a while but the IQ was so much worse than my Sony Compact. I then bought the 17-85 instead, where I also cheaped out, because the seller was right, a few more bucks and I could get the 17-40  ;D

Lighting / Re: Anything Strobist
« on: July 28, 2014, 02:31:39 PM »
Viggo:  Phottix makes several softboxes that you can place your lights inside.  They are ok.  I've not had any issue with them yet.  The only thing I don't like about those boxes is that you are limited in tilting movement.

Thanks! My Swedish friend also uses them, but can't get them in Norway, and I wonder, are the rods inside the umbrella boxes any better than the "eBay stuff" ?

I'm aware of the limited tilt action, and it's a large drawback, but it's either that or not taking it with me due to needing heavy sand bags. I just take the chance with the inside mount boxes, lol.

Any one have a link to where I can buy this bracket?

I have two of these and they work brilliantly. No wobble at the mount even with a 120 octabox

This seller has decent softboxes. The essentialphoto/pixapro ones are well made (for the price) and don't feel super cheap. Yes they aren't profoto but then what do you really expect for £50?

Thanks for the links. I guess I can't see how it can be mounted horizontally and have no support except the hot shoe. I saw that the Godox one had a screw on the horizontal rail that supported the flash under also, it's also a heavy flash making the load on the hot shoe even worse. It's 642 dollars for the ProFoto plus speedring, but in the end, that enables the use if all ProFoto boxes also.. And investment, at least that's whatni have to
Convince myself of, lol.

Lenses / Re: New Canon L Primes, but Not Until 2015 [CR2)
« on: July 28, 2014, 02:01:30 PM »
A new 50 L that's "a lot smaller" ?? Makes no sense whatsoever ..

Third Party Manufacturers / Re: Sigma 50 1.4 Art NOT bokehlicious?
« on: July 28, 2014, 04:07:13 AM »
"As everything works with lenses, no lens cannot be strong somewhere without being weak somewhere else."

Want to borrow my 200? 8)

Your 200 is weak at zooming, but I'd borrow it anyway :-)

Lol, well, it's also weak at surfing the internet on  :P

Third Party Manufacturers / Re: Sigma 50 1.4 Art NOT bokehlicious?
« on: July 27, 2014, 02:17:23 PM »
"As everything works with lenses, no lens cannot be strong somewhere without being weak somewhere else."

Want to borrow my 200? 8)

Lighting / Re: Anything Strobist
« on: July 27, 2014, 08:05:19 AM »
Wow! Fantastic shots. I really like your style. An inspiration. Makes me want to go out and shoot. I sold my wife's 5d and my camera is being fixed so I'm without a camera for a month! But when it gets back I've got my new flash and perhaps a new soft box .

No issues here either. Also took 20 minutes before the camera was returned to me. I'm not a cps member.

Third Party Manufacturers / Re: Sigma 50 1.4 Art NOT bokehlicious?
« on: July 26, 2014, 09:52:17 AM »
Kai at digitalrev published his hands-on review video. Lack of beautiful bokeh at 1.4 seems to be a weak point of this lens, based on Kai. I was wondering what other users think of it.

I think he's very wrong. And he's also wrong about build quality.

Lenses / Re: How many years before we see a 50L II
« on: July 26, 2014, 03:56:44 AM »
many years.
there is nothing wrong with the 50L.

it's a people lens. it's plenty sharp.
it's f/1.2 - so if you're not nailing focus, you need to work on your technique.
+1 and you might want to visit the many "where is the 35L II" threads for some perspective on long waits...

Thank you..

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 137