July 30, 2014, 05:01:03 PM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Daniel Flather

Pages: 1 ... 43 44 [45] 46 47 ... 57
661
EOS Bodies / Re: Are 5DIII users beta testers?
« on: April 02, 2012, 01:05:29 PM »
No.

662
EOS Bodies / Re: Shot wedding with 5DIII, dissapointed in AF
« on: April 02, 2012, 11:30:14 AM »

My other favorite features are pushing the "SET" button and the finger dial to adjust ISO directly in the viewfinder...


What?  I can't seem to achieve this, explain.  Are you truing the quick control dial, or the main dial?

663
EOS Bodies / Re: Shot wedding with 5DIII, dissapointed in AF
« on: April 02, 2012, 11:20:15 AM »
With my 580's light my 5D3 can focus in total darkness, but I only ever use spot AF.

664
Canon EF Prime Lenses / Re: Canon EF 35mm f/1.4L USM
« on: April 02, 2012, 01:16:17 AM »
I took this photo in Cuba with the 50D and 35L, wide open of course.


665
Canon EF Prime Lenses / Re: Canon EF 24mm f/1.4 II L USM
« on: April 02, 2012, 01:14:22 AM »
Great photos in this thread, and I now qualify to post in it. 


666
5D MK III Sample Images / 5D3 with 24Lii @ f1.4
« on: April 02, 2012, 12:39:21 AM »
Got up early to catch the sunrise.  24mmii @ f1.4 5D3





667
Yes, I got my 8-15, 24L, and 5D3 from them. 

668
Lenses / Re: Which lenses need micro-adjusting?
« on: April 01, 2012, 11:34:42 PM »
With my 50/1.2 that I only shoot at f1.2 (why else buy it?(well, besides the many other reasons to buy it)) any adjustment I dial in is lost due to subject or camera movement.  So why bother setting an AF adjustment?  If I shot everything on a tripod with a static subject, then yes, it needs an adjustment dialed in, but in that case I would be manual focusing anyways, so the adjustment is moot. 

This is what I've come to realize lately.  ymmv

669
Lenses / Re: 85mm f1.2 II or 70-200mm f2.8L IS II
« on: April 01, 2012, 11:20:53 PM »
Help please..any thoughts

Yes, start a new thread. 


To the OP, the 85/1.8 is 85.3%'ish of the 1.2L for less money. 

670
EOS Bodies / Re: 36x36 mm cmos sensor
« on: April 01, 2012, 10:51:52 PM »
Would the 36x36mm sensor/format have issues with lens hoods?  I'm looking at my 24mm lens right now, and I think with the hood on you'd have issues.  They are petal cut hoods for a reason, right?

671
  I have attached on shot showing how bad the vignetting is without the correction. 

In an ironic twist, that bad vignetting is one thing I love about my jump from a crop to a full frame. My new 24L's vignetting is severe and awesome.

672
What I do like is when you're zoomed right to the max you can hit the zoom to bring it back to zero zoom. 

673
EOS Bodies / Re: Canon 5D3+GPS Receiver? VOTE!
« on: March 31, 2012, 04:06:20 PM »
The first that come in my mind is when I go to Cuba. Cuba does not allow GPS device in their country.


Yes!!  I had my GPS unit in my bag the last time I went to Cuba.  They kept it at the airport when I arrived, and I picked it up on my way home.  But wow, the red tape was crazy!  I had to fill out lots a paper work and pay an fee that was about $8 CAD when I claimed it back.  The Cubans were most interested in the device than anything.  I showed them how it worked and the were utterly amazed when it showed our location on its map.

Cuba is an amazing place, go if you can.



674
EOS Bodies / Re: Canon 5D3+GPS Receiver? VOTE!
« on: March 31, 2012, 04:01:51 PM »
Nice site Preston.

675
EOS Bodies / Re: Canon 5D3+GPS Receiver. WHY?
« on: March 31, 2012, 03:39:14 PM »
I'd like it in camera. The current one looks like it begging to be knocked off and damaged. 

Pages: 1 ... 43 44 [45] 46 47 ... 57