October 25, 2014, 06:33:26 AM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Daniel Flather

Pages: 1 ... 45 46 [47] 48 49 ... 58
691
EOS Bodies / Re: Canon 5D3+GPS Receiver? VOTE!
« on: March 31, 2012, 04:01:51 PM »
Nice site Preston.

692
EOS Bodies / Re: Canon 5D3+GPS Receiver. WHY?
« on: March 31, 2012, 03:39:14 PM »
I'd like it in camera. The current one looks like it begging to be knocked off and damaged. 

693
EOS Bodies / Re: Lloyd Chambers Review of 5d3
« on: March 31, 2012, 03:20:45 PM »
Where is this noise at iso 100 everyone seems to talk about??

694
U get excellent focus
and decent exposure in the 1st shot!

Epic.

*edited for formatting sarcasm.

695
EOS Bodies / Re: DigitaRev Canon 5D MKIII vs. Nikon 800
« on: March 31, 2012, 01:45:11 PM »
the RAW files, yes.

Yes, RAW.  Those are huge files!  My 5D3 files run 24-30mb, 240 images on an 8 gig card, approximately.

696
EOS Bodies / Re: DigitaRev Canon 5D MKIII vs. Nikon 800
« on: March 31, 2012, 11:33:59 AM »
At 6:20 did he say the Nikon files are 70mb? 

697
5D MK III Sample Images / Re: 5D MK III Sharpness Test
« on: March 30, 2012, 03:35:19 PM »
Looks great, same as what I'm getting.  Thanks for posting.

698
Boom, exchange.

699
Yes, confirmed, my 200/2 makes the noise in servo.  Rock the camera a bit to make the IS work hard and the noise gets worse. 

200/2 + 5D3 = around $10,000  Canon best get this fixed.


700
Speedlites, Printers, Accessories / Re: ETTL vs Manual for fill flash
« on: March 29, 2012, 10:51:50 PM »
Did you try manual, how were the restults?  I have the same three flashes minus any soft boxes.  Once you dial it in in manual it's all good. 

701
Lenses / Re: What lens are you patiently waiting for?
« on: March 29, 2012, 10:32:08 PM »
The +6 14-24 f2.8L would be expensive!

702
EOS Bodies / Re: I think I got a sharp one
« on: March 29, 2012, 10:29:19 PM »
What's the price on the 1D?

703
EOS Bodies / Re: Canon 5D III RAW @12800 w/ NR in LR4
« on: March 29, 2012, 06:27:49 PM »
How did he get that dog to sit still?

704
Lenses / Re: Canon 200-400/1.4x vs. 600/4 II
« on: March 29, 2012, 05:59:01 PM »
The 400/5.6 with 1.4TC and crop a little in to that awesome 5d3 and you'd be set.  But the lure of a 600/4 is tempting and sometimes you just have give in.  :)


705
Lenses / Re: Canon 200-400/1.4x vs. 600/4 II
« on: March 29, 2012, 05:56:30 PM »



Still, most of my bird photography is not done on vacation but is done almost every day.  My office is within walking distance of an area that has quite a few birds and I take walks there every day during lunch.  Therefore, whichever lens I pick up will likely be used at least twice a week.

Ok, I can't imagine you taking either of these lenses to work twice a week, especially the 600/4.  I think the 400/5.6 might be lighter, add the 1.4 tc or 2.0tc and boom.  Plus you have the 70-200.

Pages: 1 ... 45 46 [47] 48 49 ... 58