October 01, 2014, 11:08:52 AM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Daniel Flather

Pages: 1 ... 45 46 [47] 48 49 ... 58
691
5D MK III Sample Images / Re: 5D MK III Sharpness Test
« on: March 30, 2012, 03:35:19 PM »
Looks great, same as what I'm getting.  Thanks for posting.

692
Boom, exchange.

693
Yes, confirmed, my 200/2 makes the noise in servo.  Rock the camera a bit to make the IS work hard and the noise gets worse. 

200/2 + 5D3 = around $10,000  Canon best get this fixed.


694
Speedlites, Printers, Accessories / Re: ETTL vs Manual for fill flash
« on: March 29, 2012, 10:51:50 PM »
Did you try manual, how were the restults?  I have the same three flashes minus any soft boxes.  Once you dial it in in manual it's all good. 

695
Lenses / Re: What lens are you patiently waiting for?
« on: March 29, 2012, 10:32:08 PM »
The +6 14-24 f2.8L would be expensive!

696
EOS Bodies / Re: I think I got a sharp one
« on: March 29, 2012, 10:29:19 PM »
What's the price on the 1D?

697
EOS Bodies / Re: Canon 5D III RAW @12800 w/ NR in LR4
« on: March 29, 2012, 06:27:49 PM »
How did he get that dog to sit still?

698
Lenses / Re: Canon 200-400/1.4x vs. 600/4 II
« on: March 29, 2012, 05:59:01 PM »
The 400/5.6 with 1.4TC and crop a little in to that awesome 5d3 and you'd be set.  But the lure of a 600/4 is tempting and sometimes you just have give in.  :)


699
Lenses / Re: Canon 200-400/1.4x vs. 600/4 II
« on: March 29, 2012, 05:56:30 PM »



Still, most of my bird photography is not done on vacation but is done almost every day.  My office is within walking distance of an area that has quite a few birds and I take walks there every day during lunch.  Therefore, whichever lens I pick up will likely be used at least twice a week.

Ok, I can't imagine you taking either of these lenses to work twice a week, especially the 600/4.  I think the 400/5.6 might be lighter, add the 1.4 tc or 2.0tc and boom.  Plus you have the 70-200.

700
Lenses / Re: Do all of canons 50 mm lens suck?
« on: March 29, 2012, 05:31:18 PM »
I find the AF of the 50L to be much better on my 5D3 than it was on my 50D.  What body are you using?  I have both the 1.4 and 1.2 and they are both great, but they need to be used with a little care wide open.  The 50L is amazing when you hit it, and on full frame the bokeh and what I call 3D look are unique.

The dof at f1.2 is thin, so some shots are missed because of camera or subject movement, so shoot lots!

 *please remove suck from the title, they don't suck.

701
Lenses / Re: Lens advice: which prime should I buy first?
« on: March 29, 2012, 05:16:12 PM »
but I really like my 24mm/1.4L. It's neat to have a wide-angle with the ability to give serious bokeh.


+1

Worth its price right there. 

702
EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: 5DMK3 - Af question
« on: March 29, 2012, 05:02:05 PM »
Yes, this is great.  Now I can turn off the options that I'll never use and never have to scroll through them again. So I have spot and single point only, single seems to be the only one you can't turn off.  Does that have to do with the grouping of lenses that I see in the manual?  Some slower lenses won't jive with spot AF?  I use the finest spot 100% of the time.

703
Thanks, yes, factory settings and High Quality mode, it looks fine to me 
(Sorry for my poor English )

Ironic thing is, your english is better than many native English speakers online, for example —Youtube.


704
EOS Bodies / Re: This web site is making me question why I lurk here
« on: March 29, 2012, 04:35:00 PM »
As soon as I read..."the 5d3 AF system sucks", I move on to another website (sorry Craig and your advertisers).  I don't seem to get any useful information from that comment which invariably the post started with "dude or bro".  So, please tell me why the 5d3 AF system sucks because I haven't bought the camera yet and I'd like to make an informed purchasing decision.

I actually laughed out loud when I read you post, thanks! :)

+100000000000

705
Hello !

This picture is edit in DPP and RAW converted to JPGs editing in High Quality mode.

Canon EF 1.4x III Extender, Canon EF 400mm f/2.8L IS USM, Canon Eos 5D Mark III,

 1/1600, f9,0, ISO 1600



Nice shot, so you converted that in DPP with the factory settings, not changing them as per many threads?  I'm having great success with DPP and my 5D3 too, after a little learning curve.


Pages: 1 ... 45 46 [47] 48 49 ... 58