« on: November 04, 2013, 12:31:35 AM »
I think we should all begin to focus on the things we do agree on so as to avoid rehashing so many of the same topics and arguments time and again:
1. The Sony sensor (D800/e) has the most DR from ISO 100-800.
2. DR levels out and advantage is gone after ISO 800.
3. 5D3 sensor does better in higher ISOs.
4. More DR is useful (and nice to have) but not always/or even often necessary.
5. Each sensor has it's own advantages AS WELL as disadvantages neither of which should be ignored when when assessing IQ or level of advancement in technology.
6. Everyone has differing needs when it comes to photography which most of us in here cannot account for.
Things to avoid since they are so clearly untrue/baseless and continue to cause unnecessary debate due to their antagonistic nature:
1. Any blanket statements such as Nikon image quality "trounces" Canon's.
2. Pre-determining whether something is completely unuseful or not before it is in people's hands.
3. Making any other inferences about how good or bad the new bodies will be since again, they are not in people's hands yet.
You taking the spice out.