« on: July 07, 2013, 05:16:00 PM »
I would not look to much after a 200/2.0. The 70-200/2.8 ISmk2 is so good at 200mm that 200/2.0 feels very expensive in comparison and the result I get from the zoom and prime is very similar at 2,8 with a 5dmk2.
The 200/2.0 from Canon is not in my eyes good as the 300/2.8IS , and when I compared Canon 200/2,0 and the Nikon 200/2.0 the Nikon lens was better.
I use the 200/2 for portraits only. It is incredible, but as you mention the 300/2.8L II blows you away. I just used it this holiday and it is a droolworthy lens I will never afford It is even very fast with the 2xIII (this was on a 1DX, so the additional battery power might have contributed to the speed).