September 02, 2014, 08:19:15 PM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Quasimodo

Pages: 1 ... 31 32 [33] 34 35 ... 58
481
Landscape / Re: Post Your Best Landscapes
« on: January 21, 2013, 01:30:35 PM »
The totally white shots reminded me of why I left Minnesota for California.

LOL, I have been in Minnesota several times, and it feels colder than Norway due to the lack of moutains :)

482
Landscape / Re: Post Your Best Landscapes
« on: January 21, 2013, 12:56:40 PM »
Got a few nice wintry landscapes lately... :o


Early Morning - 20th January 2013 by K3ntFIN, on Flickr


Cold & Damp - No. 6 by K3ntFIN, on Flickr


Cold & Damp - No. 2 by K3ntFIN, on Flickr

What do you think? :)

As a Norwegian I feel your pictures very well :)
Very nice

483
5D MK III Sample Images / Re: Ultra long daytime exposures - 5D mkiii
« on: January 21, 2013, 12:05:27 AM »
I was able to track down an 82mm ND110 for my 16-35mm f/2.8L II from www.2filter.com.  The website seems a bit sketchy, but I had no issues (other than the fact that they sent me a Scheider optics filter instead of the advertised "B+W" filter).  Below are some shots I took this weekend with my 24-105 using the B+W ND110.  The first is an 88 second exposure (before the sun went down).  The second is a 4 minute exposure


Atlanta cityscape sunset by ryotnlpm, on Flickr


[19/365] - Atlanta skyline from the Jackson Street Bridge by ryotnlpm, on Flickr

Nice pictures!

I believe that B&W is produced by Schneider. When I got my slim UV filter for my 16-35 II it came with a plastic protector which had the name Schneider optics on it, but the name on the filter itself said B&W.

484
Landscape / Re: Need critique for future improvement
« on: January 20, 2013, 11:54:50 PM »
Hello, im newbie in photography, im love to capture landscape... here im attaching some picture for C&C. i'm very pleased to hear critique from you all to improve my picture.

tqvm.. love u all.. peace  :)

Not a critique, but the second picture is magical! :)

485
At the Coca-Cola museum in Atlanta, GA


Very cool :)

486
Lenses / Re: I want a 135mm 1.8 IS L
« on: January 18, 2013, 04:52:48 PM »
Where's RLPhoto? He is ready to ditch his Holy trinity member for this baby

Haha, when I saw the title of this thread, I really thought that it's RLPhoto who started it :D

+ 100

488
Hi

489
Dear Original Poster,

If this is your first experience with White Balance ... stop looking at this post and immediately run into the other room where your significant other is sitting and give them a big hug.  Then swiftly seize your camera and using whatever settings are full auto (green box) take a bunch of pictures.  Burst, Timed, Horizontal, Vertical, anything.  Then download them onto your computer and look at them together and talk about the great expressions, and the fun you had taking the pictures, and then go get an ice cream.  When your done, come back home and snuggle and then right before bed, when you are sitting up reading a book... reach over, grab your camera, and snap another few pictures under the soft white light of the lamp on the nightstand.  Maybe even splurge with a couple of hilarious self portraits together.  Then go to bed and dream about how you'll look at these great pictures tomorrow. 
This is immensely important.  If you don't do this, you'll be missing out on your last chance to take a picture and ... deep breath everyone ... not be critical of it.  The fact is, white balance is an enormous rat hole.  Once you start down this path you won't ever go back to that happy place where a sorta exposed, lamp lit, color suppresed, low contrast image will do.  Oh no my friend, from now on its not about taking pictures ... its about taking pictures with grey cards and modifiers and obsessing about Kelvins.  In fact, you wont even be able to walk into someones house without thinking 'You really should have used color balanced 5500k bulbs in those lamps with white shades'.  And for awhile folks will think ... maybe he's got something there.  But then after hanging out with you and your custom white balanced buddy's for a night, the rest of your friends will start to think ... 'Man, if I'm not wearing a shirt with a red ring on it or holding a grey card this guy doesn't even notice me'.  And they couldn't be farther from the truth because you and I both know you for sure noticed them.  In fact, you noticed they were lit with a 2700k soft white bulb from home depot and its not doing much for their skin tones.

:)  Cheers!

LOL! Well written and funny :)

However, and I make no claim to be good at this. There are people here who have serious game in this (I have used a recycled napkin in a pinch). I got the great advice in here to buy the ColorChecker Passport by X rite, and I have to say that it is brilliant. I normally shoot with AWB (always only in RAW) for private use. However, right now I am shooting quite a few people (portraits) for a commercial campaign, and I have found that using the Colorchecker which works so well and integrated with Lightroom is saving the day and night of not having to salvage the pictures in post. All ad agencies have all adobe products, and so I shoot my pictures with the colorchecker, and I leave it to the artdirectors and designers to get it right :)

490
Lenses / Re: Sigma 35mm F/1.4 Reviews - Vignetting Disparity?
« on: January 15, 2013, 05:39:57 PM »
I also reacted on that point i Digital Picture review. I have not noticed vignetting when shooting wide open on mine.

491
Third Party Manufacturers / Re: Pocket Camera
« on: January 15, 2013, 05:34:17 PM »
I am seriously considering the Fujifilm X100s. To me thats the most promising camera of this type when Leica and Sony RX 100 is out of reach due to price. If Canon was to release a new M with FF and viewfinder, that would probably be the choice.

492
Lenses / Re: Your favorite lens is?
« on: January 14, 2013, 03:58:29 PM »
my next lens :)

493
Lenses / Re: Just bought a new Canon EF 70-300L IS USM lens.
« on: January 13, 2013, 05:22:09 PM »
Have to say that your thread is a pleasure to read :) It is invigorating (not sure if that is spelled correctly..?). Love your enthusiasm. Congrats on what obviously seems to be a great lens :)

494
Lenses / Re: Workaround for Loose Lens Cap on 8-15mm Fisheye
« on: January 13, 2013, 12:14:56 PM »
The problem with the cap is that the it uses two latches on the cap to fix it to the hood (using inside ridges at the end of of the long hood petals). These latches does not have enough force to keep the cap in place, indeed it is possible to drop the cap merely by shaking the lens/hood/cap (if it's in the "wrong" position). So how to increase the force provided by the latches?
 
This is relatively easy, the cap latch mechanism is a single plastic construction that can be removed (this relates NOT to the hood with its single release button). This is done by pushing one of the latch buttons all the way in, towards the centre of the cap, and then gently pressing it down into the cap, it should release/pop out of the inside grooves.
Repeat for the opposite latch. The entire latch ring can now be removed. It has the shape of a slightly flattened circle with the latches at opposite ends. At the inside of the push buttons one can see the latch ridges that interlocks with the hood.
To increase the holding force,  the latch ridges should be made to be further apart. This can be done by placing an object inside the ring that increases the distance between the latches by approx 3-5mm (the ring will now look more circular).
 
Now for the scary part, use an adjustable heat gun with a narrow nozzle (10mm diameter) to reshape the plastic. The temperature of the air hitting the ring surface should not exceed 120 C, too hot and the plastic will melt (forcing you to buy a new cap).  Note that there should not be any signs of the plastic ring melting during the procedure and certainly NO smoke!
 
Carefully fan the centre 90 degrees of the exposed ring at opposite sides for approx 30-45 sec each (NOT the area of the latches, just the this part of the ring). Then leave the ring for a couple of minutes before removing the tensioning object in the middle. The procedure will "realign" the plastic shape, and should maintain its new shape.

You can now test the gripping force by inserting the ring into the hood (best to disconnect the hood from the lens first), if the grip is sufficient the ring can be re-inserted into the cap.  If not satisfied the procedure can be repeated with a slightly higher temperature or increased distance between the latches. Don't use excessive force when testing.

The cap should now have a much better grip. I can now lift the lens by the cap, previously the opposite was often not possible!

Note that the above procedure is done at our own risk. :)

You don't happen to reside in Norway? I have one here :)

495
Lenses / Re: Canon 85mm f/1.8 vs Other L and non-L Canon Primes
« on: January 13, 2013, 03:31:33 AM »
If autofocus speed is important to you, no lens beats the 1.8 from Canon. Myself I have the Sigma 1.4 and ot is great, but a bit slower on AF, and the slowest, but the one that produces the best looking pictures imho and the one I would like to have if I could afford it, is the 1.2 II

Pages: 1 ... 31 32 [33] 34 35 ... 58