September 17, 2014, 09:53:15 AM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - AmbientLight

Pages: 1 ... 20 21 [22] 23 24 ... 33
Canon General / Re: Loving Canon right now.
« on: September 18, 2012, 10:04:03 AM »
It might be good for someone to start a Canon-hate site, so that in this forum we can get back to discussing photography and away from all those silly troll posts.

EOS Bodies / Re: The Mirrorless Future
« on: September 18, 2012, 09:45:42 AM »
Let's suppose my own reaction time would be 150 msec and the camera would add another 50 msec, then most of the time taken is my own reaction being what it is. Now if you take a look at a 300 msec total you are in a totally different area and no, I won't be able to optimize a lot by a quicker reaction on the photographer's side.

Just think about seeing an interesting situation and wanting to take a photo and because of the camera wasting time on top of your own reaction time the moment is just gone.

That's no good. Staying within a sufficiently short timeframe from looking at a scene to the picture being taken is the key element.

Software & Accessories / Re: GPS, does anyone really use this???
« on: September 18, 2012, 09:04:24 AM »
well personally I don't need it and I don't want it. I guess it is mostly for those, who want their photos uploaded at Google Earth or do a lot of hiking.

Now this is nonsensical. If a business is not doing well then you exchange CEOs. If a business is doing well, why would you do that? Just compare Sony's earnings in the last years. Now this is where you see CEOs exchanged and for good reason, too. I do hope for Sony that Kazuo Hirai (their new CEO) is a good one. I would hate for that company to continue to go down the drain.

Lenses / Re: Which lenses to start?
« on: September 18, 2012, 04:39:14 AM »
The 100mm L Macro is an excellent lens, but its focal length is within the range of the 70-200mm. For a general walk-around lens this focal length is too long. I therefore stick to recommending the new 24-70mm f2.8 Mark II, which covers anything from wide angle to short tele in form of just one lens.

Okay, so the OP won't be able to do macro shots to begin with, but specialized lenses can be added later. I already listed a variety of specialized lenses I would recommend adding.

Lenses / Re: Which lenses to start?
« on: September 17, 2012, 11:21:38 AM »
It depends if you like the versatlility of zoom lenses or prefer primes or a mix of both.

For zooms I would suggest adding the 24-70mm f2.8 Mark II. Then you might add the 16-35mm wide angle zoom.

You can also mix this with primes. I would suggest the following:
85mm f1.2 Mark II for portraits
50mm f1.2 for wider portraits and as a general standard prime lens
24mm f1.4 Mark II or 35mm f1.4 for wide or not-so-wide low-light usage
14mm f2.8 for ultra wide shots

It depends on your requirements which prime(s) you buy first.

I have left out the rather expensive big whites, so as to not make super-expensive recommendations.

EOS Bodies / Re: The Mirrorless Future
« on: September 17, 2012, 05:42:38 AM »
Focus acquisition time is reported to be 150 msec. (0.15 sec).

150 msec????? This is sooo s---l---o---w. I guess that camera is not for me after all.

EOS Bodies / Re: EOS-M Body Only?
« on: September 16, 2012, 05:19:11 AM »
Probably they will sell it in some combinations so that purchasing won't present a challenge to customers, who might want to purchase a mirrorless camera instead of a point-and-shoot, but who do not care for exchangable lenses. I expect the following:
  • EOS-M plus pancake lens
  • EOS-M plus zoom lens

You will have to purchase the adapter on top of that, since the adapter would be only for what they may think of as advanced users: People with EOS DSLRs and EF lenses

Canon General / Re: Europe trip, 1-2 months
« on: September 16, 2012, 05:05:50 AM »
I advise to concentrate on one region or one theme, so as to have sufficient time at hand to appreciate local culture and sights. You would do best to define what you are looking for and then to spend some time in those areas best matching your target interest.

For example you could go for a grand tour of the Alpine region combining Southern Germany, the Alsace region in France and Switzerland, Austria (Salzburg has been mentioned, but this is not the only beautiful spot there), the Dolomites in Northern Italy and Venice and then you can add a trip to Rome and Tuscany, which is already a pretty dense program squeezing in a lot of stuff in just two months.

As an alternative you can also define one common theme, such as visiting only larger cities such as St. Petersburg, Moscow, Vienna, Berlin, London, Dublin, Paris, Rome, Barcelona, Madrid, Lisbon, ...

EOS Bodies / Re: The Mirrorless Future
« on: September 15, 2012, 04:27:13 PM »
The Sony's size is certainly what I am looking for. The only issue is that I have no idea just how responsive the camera is. Nevertheless prime Zeiss glass in a very useful focal length and a nice full-frame sensor are quite appealing. I also hope that it allows for really quiet operation.

Lenses / Re: 24-70 vs 24-70 II
« on: September 15, 2012, 04:03:33 PM »
Thank you. This comparison pretty much hits the nail on its head. It seems I shall pick up this 24-70mm Mark II at some time.

Lenses / Re: If you can have ONLY 3 lenses, what would they...???
« on: September 15, 2012, 03:57:28 PM »
24mm f1.4 Mark II
50mm f1.2
85mm f1.2 Mark II

Lenses / Re: missing 200-400 and 100-400 announcements?
« on: September 15, 2012, 03:55:59 PM »
I hate nothing more than waiting between announcements and delivery. Therefore I am also happier in case there is no announcement around until they can actually deliver the goods. In any case I tend to buy what is at that time needed and available, so my recommendation for you is to take a look at 500mm or 400mm prime lenses. Don't worry about lenses not appearing for the next year or so. You won't be able to bring those lenses to your next shoot, will you?

Video & Movie / Re: From another perspective: Auschwitz-Birkenau
« on: September 15, 2012, 03:36:04 PM »
The perspective you have used clearly shows the carefully planned structure of the place.

If you imagine yourself not knowing what the place has been used for, it looks rather neat and efficient, which makes me really sick in connection to what has been done in that place.

It gives the appearance as if at the time those running the place had been pretty proud of their achievements in efficient mass murder. The world would be a better place, if monstrous crimes would be planned and performed only by disorganized, inefficient and incompetent people.

I know Canon L series is over Nikon top lens in terms of quality and diversity.

After 10 years  of using Canon gear and  last 2 years for professional photography i really considering switching to Nikon if Canon will not introducing a affordable entry lvl FF, a significant drop in price regarding 5D3 and an entry lvl sports/wildlife crop sensor ( called 7DMk2) with improved IQ

Two years of making your living with cameras, Canon cameras, and you will sell them all, reinvest in another type of equipment because they wont respond in the ways you stated? 

After two years, I certainly hope any investment you have in Canon equipment has long since paid for itself many times over... I'm trying to rationale the business decision on this....


Like anyone with a 5D or 1D X or 1Ds or whatever full-frame body you shoot with will want to switch to Nikon, because they bring out a new entry level full-frame body. This is only significant for Nikon shooters wanting to switch to a cheaper full-frame body. If you have Canon lenses, there is no point in changing systems just for that. If you are invested in the likes of Nikon D800 or D3/D4, there is also not a big impact by a new entry-level camera. Perhaps you might consider it as a backup camera, but so what?

Pages: 1 ... 20 21 [22] 23 24 ... 33