September 18, 2014, 10:03:52 AM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - Bennymiata

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 14
Sports / Re: Cars cars cars (and some bikes)
« on: February 05, 2014, 06:43:57 PM »
Here's a car you don't get in the US.
A Skoda Superb wagon (my work car).

Sharpness, MTF curves - these are not the most important things for a 50mm lens.
Colour, contrast and clarity are far more important.
This is why the 50mm 1.2L is so loved by those that use it often.
If you can't get sharp photos with a 1.2L, then YOUR technique is not right for this lens.

I'd love to try this new Sigma lens, as the recent Sigma's I've bought are really very good indeed and should give a bit of a hurry up to Canon and Nikon.

There's one very important thing that you are all missing here.
The fact is that a "good" mirror less camera (omd, g7 etc) are far more expensive than a dslr with equivalent iq and the dslr probably focuses faster, and more importantly for some, the dslr looks more serious while mirror less cameras look like toys.
For a lot of people who are willing to spend $1,000 or more on a camera, they want people to know they are serious.
It's just snobbery, I know, but snobbery is an important marketing tool?

Canon General / Re: Canon layoffs
« on: December 05, 2013, 02:52:11 AM »
Seeing as CEP500 hasn't come back, and it was his first post anyway, it's more than likely the guy wasn't working as well as management hoped he would, and they gave him his marching orders.
If it's just the one guy being layed off, it happens all the time.

I ran a company of over 600 employees, and I can tell you that sometimes, it was like a revolving door.
So many people come in with fantastic resumes, and after a few months, you discover it was all fairy tales.........

I'm not saying that was what cep's friend did, but in business, people move on or get moved on.
It's the way of the world.

I think mirrorless is just a flash in the pan.

Why would you pay twice the price for a mirrorless camera than an equivalent DSLR?
I think a lot of people like the idea of a smaller camera, but when it comes to shelling out YOUR money, they look like a bad and overpriced piece of dead technology.
Why are mirrorless cameras so expensive in comparison to DSLR's?
They should be half the price, especially considering their poor viewfinders (if they have one at all), poor ergonomics (it's hard to keep a camera still when it's being held at arm's length) and expensive lenses.

I think Canon got it right with the SL1 (100D). As soon as the price comes down, it will mean a big hit to the sales of EVF cameras.

EOS Bodies / Re: Patent: A Pellicle Mirror by Canon
« on: October 31, 2013, 07:13:55 PM »
I agree with gmrza.
If you look at the drawing and read the words, it does seem that Canon are talking about a mirror that can change its reflectiveness electronically.

When looking through the OVF, the mirror reflects most of the light into the prism, and when you press the shutter, the mirror goes almost clear meaning that most of the light WILL go to the sensor.

It's basically electronic mirror lifting but instead of the mirror going up and down, it just goes clear when required.
A bit like the electronic LCD glass you can get now where at the touch of a button, the glass become opaque.
This is similar, but the glass becomes either clear or reflective depending on the position of the shutter.

Canon General / Re: Consumer DSLRs "dead in 5 years"
« on: October 27, 2013, 07:42:14 PM »
I think mirrorless cameras are just a fad and will die out in a dozen years or so.
Point and squirts will also die as smartphones get better cameras in them too.

A couple of weeks ago, I got a new Samsung Note 3 phone (and the watch too), and the quality of the photos is very impressive, especially for a phone.
I don't need to carry my G1-X around anymore as the phone does a reasonable job, but I will still take my 5D3 along if I know I will be taking pictures.
I've used a few CSC cameras, and found them to be frustrating to use and difficult to hold properly, especially for slower shutter speeds.
CSC's are usually as expensive, if not more so, than a good consumer DSLR, so why would you waste your money?
If you need small, get an SL1 (EOS 100D), then you get to choose from all of Canon's lens and accessory range.

Canon General / Re: Canon LP-E6 Product Advisory
« on: October 20, 2013, 08:04:24 PM »
If you do want to use aftermarket LP-E6 batteries in your factory charger, they MUST have a facsimile of the Canon chip in the battery, otherwise the factory charger won't work.
I buy some aftermarket batteries straight from a small factory in Sydney, and they do put a copy of the Canon chip in the packs, and they work just like OEM Canon batteries.
If your battery pack does not have the correct chip in it, the factory charger that comes with the 5D3 or newer cameras just won't work at all, and may actually end up flattening your aftermarket battery.
However, if you have non-chipped batteries, just buy an aftermarket charger.
Many of the cheap Chinese web sites selling copy LP-E6 batteries actually supply an AC charger with each battery because they won't work with the newer Canon chargers.

Even the non-chipped batteries will work in your 5D3 or 6D etc., but you might not get accurate, indeed any, battery monitoring.

Lighting / Re: Ring Flash
« on: September 19, 2013, 08:52:25 PM »
Those add-on ringflash things for your speedlight are big, clunky and easily broken, to say nothing about the loss of light while it is bouncing around inside the unit.
For the same or less money, you can buy a proper ringflash from many of the Chinese websites and the one I got really works well. It might be fully manual, but you can easily adjust it from the camera menu, and for around $130 - it's fantastic.
Works well for portraits and gives a very nice circular spark in the subject's eyes.

If you want slightly different lighting from one side to the other, you can just drape bits of tissue over one side of it.
That way, it gives nice slight shadowing to one side of the face.

Lenses / Re: Size of filters for EOS Cinema lenses?
« on: September 06, 2013, 10:39:14 PM »
It would be close, as 110mm is just around 4.5" in diameter.

When are you Americans going get with the rest of the world and go metric?
It makes life so much easier.....................

EOS Bodies / Re: Canon is going to add mid format
« on: September 02, 2013, 07:27:45 PM »
Many of you seem to forget that Fuji make the current Hasselblad lenses and I don't think that Canon want to buy out Fujitsu.
However, they could easily get Fujitsu to rebrand MF lenses as Canon?

I can't see any good financial reasons for Canon to go MF as many MF using pros are going FF anyway.

EOS Bodies / Re: More Medium Format Talk
« on: August 27, 2013, 01:19:12 AM »
Perhaps Canon see the success of the Pentax 645D camera as something to emulate.
Canon always need to move forward and get people to spend ever larger amounts of money with them, so after FF, where else is there to go except to MF?

If they can do it for a reasonable price, I think there is a definite market for MF cameras and lenses.
Imagine a slightly larger 1Dx that has a 60meg MF sensor for around $10K.
If it could perform like a 1Dx but with MF goodness thrown in, I reckon a lot of pros and well-off amateurs would buy into the system, much as many amateurs, like my father, had Hasselblads back in the film days.

It would also be a halo product.
Even it didn't quite pay for itself, it would rub off on the rest of Canon's line up.

EOS Bodies / Re: Canon 70d RAW Samples
« on: August 08, 2013, 01:10:46 AM »
The big advance that none of you has mentioned, is the dual pixel focussing system, which for those of you who use live view, and/or take video, this could be a godsend.
Combine this with the rear touch-screen, where you can just touch where you want the exact focus point to be, and you can get great video out of it, without the hassle of manual focus.
Let alone Wi-Fi etc.

For many of its intended customers (and I don't include professionals here), the touch-screen, good autofocus for live view and video will be what drives them towards the 70D.
Ultimate pixel-peeping ability is not high on many people's list, although they want good quality, and half of these wouldn't even know what ISO is anyway.

Canon EF Zoom Lenses / Re: Canon EF24-105mm f/4L IS USM
« on: June 14, 2013, 08:57:59 PM »
I love my 24-105 too.
It's on the camera (5D3) 90% of the time and probably the most versatile lens I own.
I've done entire weddings using just this lens both for stills and movies and I'm still inlove with the colour and contrast it gives.

Here's some shots of the Sydney Harbour Bridge during Sydney's Vivid Festival to show how good it is even at night.

Technical Support / Re: Going medium format for studio work?
« on: May 28, 2013, 08:10:28 PM »
It may be easy to clean the sensor in a MF digital camera, but it's also very easy to scratch them.
Check out the sensors on rented MF cameras to see what I mean.

Just one little slip when puting the back on the body can mean a very expensive deep scratch on the sensor.

One other thing, MF cameras are relatively slow to operate comapred to a FF D-SLR, and if your work allows you to work slowly and deliberately, that's fine, but if you think that you can use them for events and just click away, you are sadly mistaken.

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 14