April 20, 2014, 09:55:31 AM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - ScottyP

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 32
16
Photography Technique / Re: The Cheapo Camera bag to fool the bad guys.
« on: February 02, 2014, 01:06:59 PM »
I do something similar:  I bought a Nikon-branded camera bag.   ;)

17
I have the 6D, and I intend to buy the 7D2 for my 2nd camera when it comes out, barring any awful surprises, such as a $3,500 price, and/or a lack of meaningful improvement over the current 7D. 

I think the two would compliment each other very well.  The 6D is a no-nonsense low light killer that is not terribly sophisticated in the fast-moving sports department.  A new 7D would (presumably) be good at fast action and would give that extra reach of a crop, but probably won't work as well as the FF 6D in low light.

I figure why have 2 very similar tools in the bag?  Get a different tool for different jobs.  No one carries a golf bag with nothing but a dozen 5-irons in it.

The OP, however, seems to have minimal use or desire for a sports/action camera, so probably does not want to wait for, nor pay for, the 7D2.  I think a 70D would be a good choice for him.

18
EOS Bodies / Re: Canon EOS 7D Mark II in Q2? [CR1]
« on: January 31, 2014, 08:24:58 AM »
I kind of think that handing the cameras out for testing at a high profile world-famous sporting event is more about the publicity and creating an image for the product than about testing the camera.  If you wanted to keep the camera secret, you Could do that almost anywhere; you wouldn't have people at such high profile events waving them around. I think they want them to be seen and they want rumors like this about them being there, and a rumor about them being at something big and important like the Olympics is much "cooler" than rumors about them being tested at some high school track practice.

19
I looked a LONG time for a backpack that holds 6 to 7 lenses and two bodies without looking awkward as heck. Most of the ones that hold that much are too wide, and too deep (they stick out freakishly). 

I got the Thule TPBP 101.  Don't confuse with the similar but smaller day pack TPDP 101.  It is tall rather than fat so it fits and looks and wears better.  Thule makes sporting goods and this pack looks good like a hiking pack.

It also has the security feature of a zipper that is up against your back like the LowePro 400 and 500, so it can't be unzipped by someone behind you.

Short video product description here. http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=AACti4a-DTQ&desktop_uri=%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DAACti4a-DTQ

Buy here. http://www.amazon.com/Thule-TPBP-101-Perspektiv-Backpack-Black/dp/B00F4714IG

20
Reviews / Re: Canon 6D Review: 1+ Year Hands-On [video review]
« on: January 19, 2014, 12:35:40 PM »
No.  Sorry. You cannot post something suggesting that anything about 6d is as good or better than anything about 5d. The guys who paid for a 5d will be apoplectic. Not saying it is right; it's just the way it works.

Good review though.   ;)

21
Reviews / Re: Canon 6D Review: 1+ Year Hands-On [video review]
« on: January 17, 2014, 12:41:29 AM »
Love mine. Works great in dim light.

I plan to get the 7d2 (if it emerges) for my sports/action body. The 6d will be my FF portraits and landscapes body. No need to try to get one body to do it all. Kind of like why an 18 - 300 lens would be a bad compromise at replacing all the primes and zooms between those two focal extremes.

22
EOS Bodies / Re: Patent: Microadjustment Automated
« on: January 12, 2014, 06:49:50 PM »
Is this a computer translation from Japanese?  The text is kind of garbled. 

I.E.

◦It is not done correctly the AF adjustment in your environment ??????
◾Let me be the difference adjusted value of the phase difference AF and contrast AF ??????

23
EOS Bodies / Re: EOS 7D Replacement Coming for CP+? [CR1]
« on: January 11, 2014, 09:19:29 PM »
I'm very excited for this camera!  I think that 24mp and 10-12fps with a 61pt AF system isn't unreasonable given that it matches the specs for the prototypes that were previously mentioned.  It's possible that the 70D's sensor could be used, but we've already had one rebuttal rumour that indicated the 7D II (or whatever it get's called--for the sake of simplicity, I'll refer to it as 7D II for the rest of this post) will have a brand new sensor and will not share the 70D's.  That makes sense.  I expect the 70D's sensor will find its way into the 2014 Rebel lineup, and I think Canon will want to differentiate the 7D II from the rest of the APC lineup, especially given the much, much higher price.  Will it be worth it, when one can buy a full-frame 6D for much less?  Absolutely!  I've said it before, but it bears repeating, different camera's fit different types of photographer and photography.  If I was shooting a wedding or other low-light event, I'd prefer a 6D or 5D II full-frame camera to any APS-C camera.  But I'm not, and neither of those cameras would be stellar performers for the wildlife and action based photography that is my passion.  Granted, a 5D III, with its superb AF system and decent (6fps) burst-rate still makes a good choice for either type of photography (unlike the 6D and 5D II), but still a 7D II with 10-12 fps and the cropped frames tighter framing with a given lens makes a very compelling camera for wildlife and sports photography. 
I often read here the opinion that the 7D II won't be special because it would be too close to the 1DX, but I don't concur with that assessment at all.   No matter how good the chip is, the APS-C isn't going to match the low-light capability of the 1DX and pros are still going to prefer it (and whatever replaces it), although I will not be surprised if many of them don't grab a 7D II as a second body!  In the end though, they are competing in different market-places.   What's more, Canon isn't bringing this camera out in a vacuum--they need to make sure this camera is good enough to lead APS-C technology for the net 3-5 years, so it has to be more that merely "good."  Like the original 7D, it must be ground-breaking and class-leading if it's going to compete in the $2,000 + price range.  It should also be remembered that when the original 7D arrived in 2009, the top of the line action camera in the Canon lineup was the 1D III, with 10MP and 10fps.  Canon didn't worry that the 7D matched it with 19 cross-type AF points (although the 1D III has 45 AF points, only 19 of them are user-selectable and cross-type).  If they didn't worry about making the 7D too close to the current 1D III in 2009, I doubt they'll worry about the 7D II being too close to the 1DX in 2014!  This is especially true given the level of competition the new camera faces compared to what the 7D did 5 years ago.   Why will the 7D II be awesome?  Because it simply HAS to be!  Of course, there will still be nay-sayers, even if it has the specs I expect it will have.  I've seen posts where someone wrote "yawn" at these very specs, even as I was salivating over them!  And I've read repeatedly that many just don't "get it" when one can buy a full-frame camera for less, or because it will be big and "pro", rather than small and mirrorless.  I think they miss the essential point--those of us who want this camera, know what we want, and why we want it.  If it doesn't fit your style of photography, then of course you ought not to buy one--purchase the camera that fits your shooting style and subjects.  Photography would be far less interesting if there was just one style of camera and one kind of photography. Myself--I can't wait for this camera! 
On a side note, I'm more interested in specs and capabilities than I am in the name, but I DO think 7D Mark II has a GREAT ring to it!!!  ;D

WELL SAID!


Correct. It has to be. If they don't have a truly new and better sensor they need to wait until they do. An extra couple fps is not enough improvement to justify the upgrade.  Nor is improved AF alone, since the AF was already pretty good.

Improved high ISO performance is what would set it apart. Improved DR would also get noticed.  I hope we see some of that.

24
Lenses / Re: Tamron SP 150-600 f/5-6.3 VC Review
« on: January 02, 2014, 12:02:57 PM »
$1000 for the lens, and about $700 for a crop body to screw onto it and you have quite the birding setup!  If is any good, that is. I've not had any experience with Tamron.

25
Canon General / NYT: Only Canon, Nikon and Sony will survive?
« on: January 01, 2014, 07:58:06 PM »
Interesting article from December 20.  Says smartphone selfie-shooters are not embracing the mirrorless bodies in the way it was hoped they would take to a somewhat smaller setup.  Perhaps they will eventually leave off trying to make a "kinda smaller" camera that is too small for most serious shooting, but still too big for selfie-phone man, and keep making cameras that are the proper size for 2-handed shooting. 

Also says the Big 3 will endure but the also-rans like Panasonic, Pentax, Olympus, and even Fuji don't seem like good bets going forward.

Personally I hope Fuji at least makes it.  Original sensor tech and an elegant package. 

http://www.nytimes.com/reuters/2013/12/29/business/29reuters-japan-cameras.html?_r=0

26
Great shots. Interesting notes.

27
Oops. I didn't realize the picture scrolls.

28
Well lit and good exposure. My only niggle would be the background.  It would be a little better if it was solid wall, or solid window, or if the window was centered or something. Or even have them farther from the wall so it isn't quite so sharp?

If you don't have a backdrop, or a less distracting wall, perhaps you could shoot outside if it were day.   

Also, in this one you cropped the right side a little too much and cut some elbows off.

29
Software & Accessories / Re: Black-rapid failure!
« on: December 27, 2013, 01:55:48 PM »
Luma Labs Cinch Strap

The bottom attachment is an Arca-Swiss plate, so the whole tripod-to-handheld thing is a non-issue. 

Except for the dangling strap when it's mounted on a tripod, which is a source of vibration, especially if there's wind.  Also, with collared lenses while they have an alternate solution (podmount) it's not optimal, in that switching it around from one lens to another, or switching from collared to non-collared lens, seems like it would be a hassle.  But if you only use non-collared lenses and don't mind a dangling strap, it looks like a good solution.

I can't deny the fact that the strap would remain attached while it is on the tripod, though I can't imagine the added "wind loading" from that, above the existing wind load from the camera and tripod, would be a factor to me personally. 

As for the collared lenses, I would not mount the strap to the lens collar.  I just mount it to the camera and leave it.  The biggest lens I carry would be a 70-200 with a 1/4x TC, but that works great with the strap attached in 2 places to the camera.  Just leave an extra Luma Arca Swiss plate (or any other Arca Swiss Plate) to the lens collar and it is good to go on and off the tripod.

I have thought about getting an L-bracket, but I don't use the 'pod that much, and the bracket itself seems like  it would be a bit clunky for 24/7 use, so (I guess?) I might end up taking it off a lot.  (I don't know.)  On the other hand, the Luma solution seems easy and always ready.

I don't have any truly massive 500mm or 600mm lenses which I might want to attach directly to the strap rather than leaving the strap on the camera, so that is one consideration.  I also don't use the tripod or the monopod more than 5% of the time anyway.  So some people may see things completely differently for their own habits/needs.

30
Software & Accessories / Re: Black-rapid failure!
« on: December 27, 2013, 11:55:18 AM »
Luma Labs Cinch Strap

http://luma-labs.com/pages/cinch

Connects at 2 points on the camera so "twirling" is literally impossible.
 
The bottom attachment is an Arca-Swiss plate, so the whole tripod-to-handheld thing is a non-issue. 

The versatility of choosing short and snug for carrying, or long for shooting, is great. 

Price is nice at $60 too.

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 32