February 28, 2015, 07:41:00 AM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - HarryWintergreen

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6
Lenses / Re: Canon EF 600 f/4L IS II Review
« on: July 31, 2012, 09:44:29 AM »

EOS Bodies / Re: Poll: What will be the price of first EOS M?
« on: July 22, 2012, 07:56:47 AM »
Is Canon aiming at people attending this forum? I'm afraid this is not the case. So they will be wanting to set foot on the mass market, i.e. 400-599.
btw, I think Canon has already written the G1X off, so pricing should not be dependent of the G1X sales.
In the end all I still dare to hope for is a decent mirrorless with an articulated screen that is still pocketable.

Lenses / Re: Keep 70-200 f4 IS or go for f2.8 IS II?
« on: July 21, 2012, 08:07:02 AM »
Both lenses are masterpieces by Canon. Arguing about what lense has the edge to me doesn't makes sense. F/2.8 can be an tremendous advantage. But since you already have the 300 f/2.8 this should not weigh too heavy. A lense is a tool. Not to be restricted by the weight when it comes to shooting over a longer period of time to me is quite important, too.

EOS Bodies / Re: Cancelled 1dx pre order.
« on: July 13, 2012, 07:01:21 AM »
supposed 5DIIi and 1D X had identical IQ, would this rid you of the urge to have the 1D X? If the answer is yes then you definitely do not need the 1D X.

EOS Bodies / Re: New Product Announcement Invites for July 23, 2012
« on: July 10, 2012, 08:53:19 AM »
If Canon managed to introduce real alternatives to cameras as the Fuji X-Pro 1 I'd be on board. But alas...

Same goes for the Tokina 11-16 f/2.8 which basically is a great lens. To me the amount of chromatic abberation is too much. So, you have to prevent shooting under conditions with harsh transitions of contrast. DxO has included camera-lens combinations entailing the Tokina lens. Don't know if and how good this works.

Animal Kingdom / Re: Show your Bird Portraits
« on: July 01, 2012, 09:18:54 AM »
40D, 70-200 f/4.0 IS

Animal Kingdom / Re: Show your Bird Portraits
« on: July 01, 2012, 09:11:17 AM »
[7d + 70-300 l

How about that? ('Naturschutzgebiet' is 'national nature reserve' in English)

Lenses / Re: Canon EF 100-400 f/4-5.6L IS [CR2]
« on: June 25, 2012, 02:49:14 PM »
Provided IQ is close to excellent, for an amateur phtographer with wild-life ambitions what would be the alternative to spending more than 2k for a (highly speculative) mark II version of the Canon 100-400? Sigma 120-300 f/2,8 is too short in reach and @ f/5,6 not superior to the current Canon 100-400. The other serious alternatives are way too expensive. Unfortunately  :(

EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: IQ difference of FF vs APS-C?
« on: June 21, 2012, 02:08:27 AM »
As it's already been said, beyond technical ('pixel-peeping') perspectives there's the dof thing that leads you to a more thorough considering of what you are going to shoot. Action and wildlife are crop body's patch. And when sticking to crop bodies good glass is essential (and this opens up a back door to ff  ;)).

Canon EF Prime Lenses / Re: Canon EF 200mm f/2L IS USM
« on: June 15, 2012, 04:34:05 AM »
Thanks willrobb, handsomerob, briansquibb and K-amps.

The first two images were photographed with a 5D2 using it's center AF point.

K-amps & thepancakeman, good eye. I was shooting at f/2.0 and did not crop so only the camera's in the DoF. As I am not used to shooting portraits with the lens I miscalculated the DoF.

briansquibba I would buy this lens if you need an extra stop of IS, an extra stop of light and the bokeh. If you need neither then the Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM is more than sufficient.

Thanks Dolina... needless to say, it is one heck of a lens!

That it is. That it is.

Here's another shot of the model that ya all like so much. :)

TLR by alabang, on Flickr

faint... ;)

Canon EF Prime Lenses / Re: Canon EF 200mm f/2L IS USM
« on: June 15, 2012, 04:32:08 AM »

TLR by alabang, on Flickr

Thanks K-amps, Leopard Lupus & handsomerob

extremely nice!!!

EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: 5D mk II still a viable option?
« on: June 14, 2012, 09:06:11 AM »
The 5DII is an FF camera and as such it offers many ways to improve your skills as a photographer. I do like crop bodies, but it is not the same. Since owning a 5DII, looking through the viewfinder of a crop body gives me the feeling that something's missing. In terms of RAW IQ, the 5DII at least performs equally well as the 5DIII (except for higher ISO). The attached image may give a slight impression of the fact that the 5DII is not basically incapable of taking photos of fastly moving objects. This photo of a home-flying snipe was taking when dusk had already started to settle (ISO 640, f/8, 1/1000, 1.4 Kenko TC, 70-200 f/4 L IS, very little post-processing). It's the best out of three shots taken.

The old story: once you happened to get your hands on a 1D you can't help but seeing the sub-1D-bodies as a bit inferior. So keep your fingers away from it - that's at least what I do.  ::)

this 'who's got the best camera and if it's not my brand I'm gonna fall into despair' attitude still doesn't appeal to me. Is there anybody out there who believes seriously his or her poor Canon gear will prevent him or her from showing what his or her creativity is up to? And will we have to assume a future started by the D800 where people say, 'oh quite nice with your 5D3 but if you had taken your images with a Nikon body this would have made the essential difference and therefore stay in the realm of inferiority'?

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6