136
June 19, 2013, 01:45:52 PM
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
137
Video & Movie / Re: timelapse. how they do this
« on: December 05, 2012, 09:47:14 AM »
A way for Windows users to maybe do it with, f'rinstance, Lightroom....
Say we're using 130 total images, each one a 1-5 minute exposure.
Stack images 1-5 and process. Unstack those, stack 2-6 and process. Unstack those, stack 3-7 and process. Rinse and repeat to the end.
Run the processed frames through a video editor.
Would be nice to automate this tedious process, though. There's probably some Windows compatible software out there that can be adapted.
Say we're using 130 total images, each one a 1-5 minute exposure.
Stack images 1-5 and process. Unstack those, stack 2-6 and process. Unstack those, stack 3-7 and process. Rinse and repeat to the end.
Run the processed frames through a video editor.
Would be nice to automate this tedious process, though. There's probably some Windows compatible software out there that can be adapted.
138
EOS Bodies - For Video / Re: Inexpensive lens for Video
« on: November 30, 2012, 01:46:26 PM »
1) The 28-135 zoom is horribly stiff.
2) If I was in your shoes, frankly I'd buy the wife a decent digital or hard drive camcorder. There are a lot of varieties available for reasonable prices. Like you say, it's for family memories. As an added bonus, while your children are still young you can show them how to operate the camcorder and just let them do whatever. Did that with my son when he was about 10, it's our favorite family video of all time, he had quite the conversation with a garden gnome.
2) If I was in your shoes, frankly I'd buy the wife a decent digital or hard drive camcorder. There are a lot of varieties available for reasonable prices. Like you say, it's for family memories. As an added bonus, while your children are still young you can show them how to operate the camcorder and just let them do whatever. Did that with my son when he was about 10, it's our favorite family video of all time, he had quite the conversation with a garden gnome.
139
EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: Alternative (to weddings) revenue stream
« on: November 30, 2012, 01:34:25 PM »
I used to try to run. Never could get that 'runner's high' or whatever it it. I'll run when horses do calculus. Tell you what, though, any of you are welcome to photograph me as I attempt to run a half marathon. I'll be the guy vomiting in the bushes. 
140
EOS Bodies - For Video / Re: Free and Inexpensive Video Editors
« on: November 13, 2012, 01:38:40 PM »
Not the first time I've seen Vegas recommended, I may have to try it out. I'm interested in rendering timelapses in HD in addition to video editing, I'm not happy with what I get from my older version of Pinnacle Studio. I've read that the newest version of Pinnacle Studio is quite a disappointment.
141
Canon General / Re: Canon Can't Even Make a Billion Dollars Anymore
« on: November 02, 2012, 09:40:11 AM »
Doesn't affect this amateur a whit; as for pros, I'll defer opinions on that to you pros. If I can afford it and the Director of Acquisitions (my wife) is okay with it, I'll buy it. I'll shop around and then find a way to pay over time for no interest if it's a big slug of bucks. Dealers will find a way to add value to the deal to make for an attractive package at Canon's MAP. I don't mind using 'last year's technology' if it works for me. In a year the 5dIII won't suddenly stop taking nice photos, anymore than my 40D did after getting a 60D. Improved lenses are a different animal, the best is really worth ponying up for. I can see that MAP may help smaller and more local retailers who find it difficult to compete with the big boys.
142
Lenses / Re: Visible Dust inside Canon EF135mm f/2L - please is there any Help? Disassemble?
« on: October 30, 2012, 01:39:55 PM »
In a previous I made a living working on optics. A little internal dust is not worth worrying about. A small chip or scratch is not worth worrying about (a dab of flat black paint on a chip is an acceptable treatment). A lot of internal dust is not really worth worrying about, you'd be surprised how much dust it takes to have any effect on images. A fingerprint IS worth worrying about, never allow a fingerprint to remain on a lens. I keep a bottle of ROR and some cotton swabs on hand at all times for just that reason. Dust on the sensor IS worth worrying about - have it cleaned, better yet, get comfortable doing it yourself. Internal fungus is worth worrying about - have it cleaned. Go out and use your lens.
143
EOS Bodies / Re: EOS Bodies - The ultimate duo & why
« on: October 19, 2012, 12:12:42 PM »PS: I always believe that there's a reason why Canon make these two models use the same battery60D also uses the same battery, and the 20D-50D used the same battery that the 300D and 5D (mark 1) used as well...With the exception of the 1D/D's, I don't think there's a shared battery for two seperate lines of product.
Sorry, my mistake. I should have checked the batteries for those cameras.
Didn't realize that the older XXD series, 5D and other models use the BP-511 series battery.
Canon used the BP-511 in a number of cameras. In my own case, I had at one time a G2, 300D, 40D and DV20 all using the same batteries! I still have and use the G2 and 40D, gave the 300D to my brother years ago and the DV20 is destined for trade in with CLS.
144
Lenses / Re: What 3 lenses do you dream of and long to own?
« on: October 05, 2012, 05:51:27 PM »
TS-E 10-500mm/f2.8 IS
17-40
24-70
17-40
24-70
145
EOS Bodies / Re: Shutter count request to Canon.
« on: October 04, 2012, 12:44:51 PM »
The only time I've ever given thought to shutter count is for time lapse on my 40D. I'll have the shutter replaced if it fails because it's worth it to ME - this camera's been modified for astrophotography and has already been serviced for shutter release button and USB board replacement. My 60D is not modified - if I wear out the shutter it won't be for many years and may not be worth repairing. With Magic Lantern and FPS override, I'm not likely to wear out the shutter anytime soon. Shutter count is (to me) analagous to odometer reading and physical appearance of a used car bought from an individual. High mileage and a neglected interior tell me something. High mileage, maintenance records and a well cared for interior tell me another. Very low mileage tells me something else. So far, all my cameras have been bought new, if I buy used I will ask for a shutter count. Superfluous info for some, but it's my money and nothing personal.
146
Lenses / Re: DPReview and DxOMark to partner for lens testing
« on: October 02, 2012, 08:58:08 PM »
It's been quite a while since I visited DPReview, I didn't know about all the changes. Years ago I bought a Canon G2 when it came out based on their review. A shame it's gone downhill.
147
Lenses / Re: Excellent shorter lens with TC vs Average longer lens
« on: October 02, 2012, 01:53:28 PM »
I would recommend a good tracking mount be your next purchase. A 300/4 will take some fine images of astronomical objects, but you'll need 30-90 second exposures in order to use lower ISO settings for less noise. The beauty of using a telephoto lens for a beginning foray into astrophotography is that you have a lens useful for other photography. A telescope is somewhat less versatile. I shoot with a Canon 300/4, Sigma 400/5.6, Sigma 70-200/2.8 and several telescopes. I have a 500/8 mirror lens I bought for a song that I've never used for astro.....that'll change soon.
This was a shot taken during a public stargaze last fall, single shot with minimal post-processing. Modified 40D with EF 300/4.
This was a shot taken during a public stargaze last fall, single shot with minimal post-processing. Modified 40D with EF 300/4.
148
EOS Bodies / Re: Comparing 6D with 5D3
« on: September 28, 2012, 04:58:46 PM »I'm interested in picking a 5dmkiii or a 6D for astrophotography. Out of the two, which one points to have a higher signal to noise ratio?
Astro is one of my prime interests also; I've gone film-300D-40D(modded)-60D and was interested in the high ISO capabilities of both the 6D and 5D3. One thing I'd miss with both of those would be the EOS Clip filters I use. I think if you're considering plunking down the bucks for either one, it might be worth renting each one first before locking yourself in. I would at least wait until others (with deeper pockets than mine) have put both cameras through their astrophotography paces and posted reviews/results. Just when you decide......the 7DMkII will come along.
149
EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: A Quick Color & Noise Comparison: Canon EOS-1D X vs Canon EOS 5D Mark III
« on: September 22, 2012, 10:59:00 AM »
WOW!!! Someone doesn't know how to park!
Oh......yeah........both cameras are wonderful, choose one and enjoy. You won't be disappointed.
Oh......yeah........both cameras are wonderful, choose one and enjoy. You won't be disappointed.
150
Canon General / Re: How do you sell your gear?
« on: September 20, 2012, 09:53:03 PM »
For the record, I'll plug FredMiranda. Bought a few things there. Another site I do business with is Astromart - heavy on astronomy stuff (duh) but photo gear is on there also. Bought and sold astro gear and bought photo gear several times there. One time fee for membership, though.