October 24, 2014, 06:26:08 AM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - emag

Pages: 1 ... 14 15 [16] 17 18 ... 22
Canon General / Re: refurbished Canon 5d mk iii
« on: January 16, 2013, 09:52:57 AM »
Look at it this way - you now have a camera that has been through Canon's QC twice!  Forget those last minute second thoughts; keep, use and enjoy your camera.  I for one have no reservations buying refurb, it fits my wallet quite nicely.  Adorama stands behind refurb quality as evidenced by the warranty period.  I'm a moderately-heeled hobbyist, but much of my astronomy and photo equipment is used or refurb, I've had some of it for decades.  Over the years most of what I no longer have has been donated to my local rescue mission second hand store, my astronomy club for everyone to use and to people I know who can still find use for it even if I can't (not talking 600/4 lens type stuff here, of course).  The only time I think "What will this be worth in the future" is when making investments.

EOS Bodies / Re: EOS not good for NASA?
« on: January 15, 2013, 06:30:16 PM »
It's been many years, but....when Uncle Sam switched the equipment I used to work on from 70mm film to 35mm, modified Nikon bodies were used.  They proved to be more reliable when subjected to adverse conditions, primarily shock and vibration.  Some of the data to support that undoubtedly came from NASA, but I'm sure tax dollars were spent to confirm it.  Then again, we also continued to use Betamax long after it was dead in the civilian market.

HDR - High Dynamic Range / Re: Canon 5D mark 3 in-camera HDR shots
« on: January 13, 2013, 01:14:11 AM »
"... forget the nay sayers, you cannot please everyone ...
I use HDR for a lot of my panos, but I PP in LR.  Having it in camera would be nice even though it might still need tweaking.

Abstract / Re: What is this?
« on: January 12, 2013, 11:33:14 AM »
It's only $120,000.00 at B&H.
A mere $20,000/mo using BillMeLater  ;D

EOS Bodies / Re: EOS 60D Stock Levels Getting Low?
« on: January 11, 2013, 09:17:58 AM »
IMO, the only question is do you want to continue with crop or switch to FF.  Make that decision and you have your answer.  Again, IMO, the next crop camera will be fiendishly more expensive than any of us thinks it should be.......but it will be an excellent successor to the 7D (not to the 60D).

Lenses / Re: Dropped my 70-200L F4 onto the carpet from my bag. Advice.
« on: January 11, 2013, 09:00:54 AM »
Don't worry too much. Test for lens element alignment issues, tape five printed pages on a wall and square your camera to it, space the pages so they are in the center and each corner of your frame and then make teat shots at all focal lengths wide open, either move the camera or the pages to keep them in he corners. If you have alignment issues the pages will have very different sharpnesses.

If you have an alignment issue Canon can fix it for a reasonable amount, but you have to send it in to them for a quote.

Yup.......teat shots....

Lenses / Re: Will Canon be making a 16-35 f/2.8 IS anytime soon?
« on: January 11, 2013, 08:58:04 AM »
Nikon has patented for a 16-35mm f/2.8 VR lens (VR of Nikon is the equivalent of the IS of Canon).
Does Canon plan on making an equivalent of Nikon's recently patented lens?


My 40D was modified by Gary Honis, I use it for astonomy.  I may go with 6D/5D3 later this year and will have my 60
D similarly modified.

EOS Bodies - For Video / Re: Inexpensive lens for Video
« on: January 08, 2013, 09:27:21 AM »
Yes I have learned this in the few weeks since my post... bit the bullet and got my wife a new "handycam" after playing around with my DSLR and realizing it wasnt going to be her bag. That being said, I am having fun taking more videos with it now, as it was something I had never bothered to learn or experiment with before!

Good choice.  Here in the Canon DSLR fora, it's easy to forget that such is not ALWAYS the most practical tool.  There's a hammer head on my fence pliers, works fine when I don't want to carry a lot of tools for oddball jobs.....but I wouldn't use it for carpentry.  Back up those videos, you'll have lots of laughs over the years.

Glad to hear all went well, Rev. :D

EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: Anybody using MagicLantern?
« on: January 07, 2013, 05:55:14 PM »
ML was my reason for getting the 60D.  I use time lapse, FPS override and ML's bracketed exposure (HDR) frequently.  I have an astro-modified 40D and would love to see a stable release for that camera.  I also installed the Wasia hack in my old 300D back when I had it.  I'm all in favor of anything that makes a tool more useful.  YMMV.  My complements to the talented individuals who develop ML.

Technical Support / Re: Repairing Scratches - 5D MKIII
« on: January 05, 2013, 09:16:01 PM »

It could always be worse... http://iphotonews.blogspot.com/2010/03/world-famous.html

Holy cow!!!  The fabled full-frame mirrorless and 500mm TS-E lens!  I KNEW it wasn't a myth!!!

Not worth worrying about, it won't affect images.  Eventually you'll have specks on your sensor.....I suggest you have a professional cleaning done at that point.  No need to send it to Canon for a cleaning, any camera repair shop can do it, I'd suggest asking a local photo supply shop who they recommend.  It isn't hard to do the job right when using the right tools.  Eyeglass cloths and eyeglass cleaner are not the right tools.  The only thing they are good for is removing a fingerprint....only because short of breakage, a fingerprint is the worst thing you can do to an optic.  Worse than dust, chips or scratches.  I clean my own gear (cameras, lenses, telescopes), but then I used to do it for a living on equipment that cost the taxpayers far more than cameras.  Relax and keep shooting.

My $.02

5D3 is 'better'...but not worth the price difference for a non-pro unless the price is not an issue to you.

6D image quality (outside of DR issues) is outstanding.  That's kinda what it's all about.  For wide DR images, shoot bracketed.

White balance is a non-issue IMO.  Use custom WB or shoot Raw and fix in post.  If you don't do any PP, get a P&S.

The 6D is not aimed at professionals or wannabe's, though it may be a suitable backup body for some pro's.  YMMV.

To some, an articulating LCD seems.....amateurish.  Until you try it for a while.  Perhaps this was the tradeoff for wifi. 

Focus points - it still has more autofocus capability than my old Nikon F2 did.  If I made a living shooting sports or BsIF I'd go with the 5D3.  But I don't and I won't.  I can afford but not justify it, the price difference goes to glass.

My feeling is that the 6D was aimed at the higher end amateur market.  More precisely, those who are already Canon DSLR owners, and frankly I think Canon hit the mark.

EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: Upgrade from 6D from 450D
« on: December 29, 2012, 06:05:56 PM »
28-135 would be a disservice to the 6D.  A mediocre lens.

Pages: 1 ... 14 15 [16] 17 18 ... 22