« on: February 23, 2013, 04:43:49 PM »
Besides, look at the reality of Canon's insane camera body pricing lately compared to the completion. They'd price it so high that it would be ridiculous! But it would probably shoot 2k video...
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
This lens should be under $4k. I guess there are people willing to buy it anyway, and so Canon will charge what the market will bear.
I don't know. It is a considerably more complex lens to manufacture than a 500mm f/4 or 600mm f/4, offers 200-400mm zoom at a constant f/4, and up to 560mm @ f/5.6 with the 1.4x switched in.
Besides, at $4k, there'd be no room for the 100-400 II!
There are likely other settings involved, I'd save the settings, and then reset the camera to see if the problem goes away. Then restore the settings and see if it comes back.
Does it bother anyone else that he thinks f2.0-f/2.8 is 3/4 of a stop and f/1.8 to f/2.8 is a full stop