i wouldn't edit it as the focus missed. i would curse under my breath and then check my calendar for when i could go shoot again.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
The best zoom I have ever used is the 24-105, so I guess I feel a hint of skepticism regarding their performance versus primes.
love my canon 24mm TS II for wedding photos with narrow DOF.
and for landscape photos with as much DOF as i can get.
don´t limit yourself because you think a lens is made for a specific purpose
Isn't one of the possible application that you can (apparently) have a large DOF with wider apertures? Foreground to background sharp without having to stop down to f/11 or higher?
yawn... this thread is boring... I swear... worrying about altering an image? For the love of god, anyone who thinks national geographic doesn't alter their images, anyone who doesn't think photographs in some way shape or form was altered at print competitions and fairs, anyone who things a simple head shot hasn't been smoothed, blemishes cloned out, filters applied, double chin and loose skin warped and removed... You are just fooling yourself... I can almost guarantee you that the only images that haven't been manipulated in some way are those who have no access to photoshop, but then it can be argued even posing someone can be "altering" a natural photograph... get over it, it's not worth 12 pages on canon rumors discussing the "ETHICS"... my lord.... (then again i'd rather talk about this than some pixel peeping nerd debating the file quality of a 7d or 5d or such...)