May 23, 2013, 12:21:13 AM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Rat

Pages: 1 ... 6 7 [8] 9 10 ... 14
106
Speedlites, Printers, Accessories / Re: AA Battery Charger and Batteries
« on: November 26, 2012, 08:03:23 AM »
Glad we could help :)

...although advising Eneloops is a no-brainer. You now know why, too ;)

107
EOS Bodies / Re: When will we have a full frame body below $1,000?
« on: November 24, 2012, 09:48:09 PM »
I don't believe that the FF sensors cost dramatically more to make than 1.6 crop sensors.
I do believe that. Exponential error rates truly are a bitch. But although an aps-c sensor can be manufactured for a couple of dozens of dollars tops, an FF sensor doesn't need to cost more than a few hundred dollars. You'd think that a $700 Rebel with a FF sensor slapped on would fit the bill.

However, stuff like the shutter, the mirror mechanism and the pentaprism needs to be a lot bigger too, and that isn't exactly cheap either. Now you can save money on most of those (say: pentamirror instead of prism) but that would chip away at the quality of both camera and images. And quality is exactly the reason to choose FF over crop. It would make no sense to produce an extremely cheap FF camera, unless of course the market for gear whores becomes substantially bigger than that for actual photographers. I may be naive, but I don't think that's the case yet.

By the way: every few decades prices double because of inflation, so a sub-$1000-camera will be less likely every year. If it is to happen, it'll need to happen in the very near future - say less than five years. Unless Sony starts making 450mm sensor wafers with excellent yields real soon, and I don't see that happening. And I don't see Canon invest in that sort of tech anytime soon at all.

All in all, my guess is never, but you may get lucky between 2015 and 2020 :)

108
EOS Bodies / Re: What will be the issue with the 6D
« on: November 24, 2012, 11:29:22 AM »
Errr, hmmm, 6D is a camera with GPS not GPS with a camera...
I'm sorry, I was trying to use humor to give an impression of how long a typical Canon battery might last while using GPS. I should've known not everyone pays attention to smileys. Next time I will use [IRONY]-tags.

109
EOS Bodies / Re: What will be the issue with the 6D
« on: November 24, 2012, 08:19:19 AM »
I hope there is a firmware feature that lets the user adjust the gps tracking tradeoff power/precision
Gps is not a real battery hog if they just use a modern low-power chipset. My WinTec 202 (a recent microBlox gps logger) will log with walking precision for 24 hours on a single battery charge of 4,4Wh - about a third of the capacity of an LP-E6. So if you only shoot an occasional photo, a gripped, logging 6D might still last close to a week :))

110
Lenses / Re: Samyang 24 TS confirmed for Photokina!
« on: November 17, 2012, 04:31:21 PM »
Can't find if others have posted this already, but the release of the 24TS has apparently been pushed back to March 2013  :(

111
Landscape / Re: Solar Eclipse Next Week - Any Suggestions?
« on: November 17, 2012, 08:46:24 AM »
The Bing search engine had this stunning pic as their wallpaper a few weeks ago. I'd appreciate any insight as to how it was done.
That looks a suspicious lot like the sun's magnetic field. Although there might be tricks to take photographs of solar wind, I think they would require specialist equipment and more than just a few filters. I suspect this might just be an artist's impression, though.

112
EOS Bodies / Re: Canon's APS-C sensor versus the competition
« on: November 16, 2012, 05:03:07 PM »
You also get a little more reach for your sensor :P.
And a little less use for your expensive L glass ;)

113
Speedlites, Printers, Accessories / Re: AA Battery Charger and Batteries
« on: November 15, 2012, 04:48:05 PM »
Are you sure you've set it to just charge? If you selected 'test' or especially 'refresh' it will take much, much longer. Then, occasionally, my LaCrosse BC-700 will fail to detect a full battery. To check, I just remove and replace a cell which then will be marked as 'full'.

114
EOS Bodies / Re: Canon EOS 5D Mark III Blinking Red AF Point Information
« on: November 15, 2012, 01:00:12 PM »
WTF, then just give us a short AF blink when the AF-On button is pushed. Just like it was with the MarkII. At least it would be on the same level then. No reason to make this more complicated as it is.
At any rate, that would only work for the first shot - you still wouldn't know where the AF points would move for the 2nd, 3rd, ... shot. Which is the actual issue, because the red-flare-on-focus *is* available in One Shot mode (and we all set the DOF button to toggle between One Shot and AI Servo. Right? Right?). So don't oversimplify either ;)

115
EOS Bodies / Re: Canon EOS 5D Mark III Blinking Red AF Point Information
« on: November 15, 2012, 09:45:49 AM »
They should release whichever feature has been implemented and tested thoroughly. That way, we would get new feautures sooner.
Agreed. However, a firmware upgrade is often associated with 'repairing' things, so if they put out too many, the camera may, to the uninitiated, come across as unfinished or broken. Also, it's possible to f*** up an upgrade (empty batteries, turning it off halfway through, etc) and Canon will obviously want to limit the number of "their software bricked my camera!"-stories. But still, agreed :)

116
EOS Bodies / Re: Canon EOS 5D Mark III Blinking Red AF Point Information
« on: November 15, 2012, 09:18:30 AM »
Forget making him switch to Nikon.... "Off with his head"  I say !
Isn't that about the same?  :o

117
EOS Bodies / Re: Canon EOS 5D Mark III Blinking Red AF Point Information
« on: November 15, 2012, 09:05:37 AM »
Dear Canon,

If you really can't get the red lights to work with AI Servo, please may you hand us something else as an apology.
Don't victimize yourself because you bought a great camera with a few shortcomings that you could - and should! - have known about in advance. You're just saying that you bought the thing on impulse and that you want to blame the consequences on someone else.

If you insist on this behaviour, please switch to Nikon.

118
EOS Bodies / Re: Canon EOS 5D Mark III Blinking Red AF Point Information
« on: November 15, 2012, 08:34:27 AM »
Good to have the info, and to know they tried.  But it kind of sounds like they are saying "sorry, but no dice."
Anyone else thinks that the April release date for the new firmware was set so far in the future in order for Canon to have time to work out how to go about this problem?

It'd be very nice to have, but it looks like you're right - and the sooner they give up, the better; that way we won't have to wait as long for the f/8 AF and, hopefully, a higher minimum shutter speed with auto-iso.

119
Speedlites, Printers, Accessories / Re: AA Battery Charger and Batteries
« on: November 10, 2012, 10:03:56 PM »
Eneloops hardly need any attention. The figures vary, but Sanyo claims capacity decreases by 15% yearly. I recharge all spares about once a year and the rest when necessary, which is basically only after use.

120
Speedlites, Printers, Accessories / Re: AA Battery Charger and Batteries
« on: November 07, 2012, 06:40:54 PM »
Im really looking forward to not buying normal batteries AT ALL ANYMORE EVER!
There, I fixed it for you :) You may find yourself buying more Eneloops for a while, however, for everything you own with AA or AAA compartments.  I did, about five years ago. Never looked back, never spent another dime, very happy :)

Oh, as for the charging: as a rule of thumb, charge at a current of 1/3rd of the listed capacity tops. So for a 2100mAh battery, use 700mA or less. Makes 'em last longer.

Pages: 1 ... 6 7 [8] 9 10 ... 14