I tend to trust my center AF. The others are fine for landscape, but hit and miss for portraiture (unfortunately).
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
That's great Artwork than involved good photography but the final product would be classified by me as Artwork.
If I can do it in the wet darkroom (cropping, dodging, burning, filtering) then it's completely legal
I found the sky boring and added clouds to make it more interesting.
Do you think this is cheating? I really want to know.
Am very confused. I have made changes but not altered nature. Have I done something wrong?
Seems like the smartest thing is to buy gear made on the continent where you live.
Wait, 1.3 crop? I think you guys are thinking backwards...
A 1.3 crop sensor is BIGGER than a 1.6 crop... so how can Nikon offer a BIGGER crop than the 1.5 crop sensor they put into the camera?
what is 1.3x crop mode?
how can a camera that has an 1.5 crop sensor have an 1.3 crop mode?
does that mean the image is cropped further with an 1.3 factor?
only a part of the sensor is used?
QuoteIt's possible canon will use the 1Dx AF unit which would make for incredible coverage on APS-C (and if it has dual processors maybe it could be fully functional unlike the 5D3).
Unlikely. Canon doesn't work like that.
The 7D Mark II needs to be clearly inferior in every way to the 1DX.
That is the Canon way.
Will the 7D2 or the 70D meet this Specs? I hope so....
Do you live in the US ... if so, for under $1000 the only option is 24-105 f/4 L IS ... the Tamron 24-70 f/2.8 VC sells for almost $1300 in US ... but a few months ago I bought brand new Tamron 24-70 f/2.8 VC from Amazon Japan for $1048 ... currently it is selling at $965 in Amazon.co.jp
please explain what do you mean with this:
But it's not reasonable to expect those algorithms to differ by more than a minor amount, and Nikon cameras are notorious for royally screwing up white balance in exactly the way the original poster has discovered. I'd go so far as to suggest that the cameras are unacceptable as shipped, though the problems should vanish in an ICC managed workflow.
I missed that it was video
make a real WB against a qp-card
Does it make sense that setting an identical Kelvin color temperature on different bodies would give different results?
ThisAnkorwatt's point probably was: you can see that they are different, but without a reference how do you know which one is correct?
Well, I don't know about you - but when I'm looking at two images with obviously different WB, and I have the original physical object/scene which was imaged as a reference, which the OP clearly does, I have no trouble telling which WB is correct and which is wrong.