April 21, 2014, 12:31:47 PM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - iso79

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 12
16
Lighting / Do 600EX-RT not work with Cybersyncs?
« on: February 10, 2013, 04:09:04 PM »
I plugged one in to my new 600EX-RT flash but can't seem to trigger it. Is there a certain mode I have to be work? It works fine on my old 580EXII.

17
Lenses / Re: 70-200 is ii vs non is
« on: February 08, 2013, 12:16:44 PM »
The non-IS is supposedly sharper. Get the IS version if you have the arms of a body builder with the shaky hands of an old person.

18
Lenses / Re: Roger Buys a Camera System: A 24-70mm System Comparison
« on: February 08, 2013, 11:14:59 AM »
This is why I don't bother with most 3rd party lenses except Zeiss lenses.

19
Reviews / Re: Review - Canon EF 50 f/1.2L
« on: January 31, 2013, 09:14:44 AM »
Such an overrated lens!  ;D

20
Lenses / Re: Canon EF 24-70 f/2.8L II is a Peerless Performer
« on: January 28, 2013, 09:43:56 AM »
It's great no doubt, but I have to pay 3650 USD to get one, so I simply have to live vicariously through the people who own it ::)

Just start saving up. I sold my Mark I on Craig's List for 1200 so the Mark II only ended up costing me 1k.

21
Lenses / Re: Canon 24-70 ii - another superlative
« on: January 16, 2013, 04:32:57 PM »
I love primes as the next person but having to change them all the time is annoying. Sometimes causing you to miss shots and interrupt the flow of your shoot.

22
Lenses / Re: 135L vs 85L vs 70-200L II
« on: January 16, 2013, 03:10:01 PM »
Buy all three seriously.

23
Lenses / Re: Canon 24-70 ii - another superlative
« on: January 16, 2013, 10:38:54 AM »
I did the same thing and sold my Mark I. So I only had to pay $1200 for it  8) I'm loving the prime quality sharpness. It was totally worth the money. I don't care if it doesn't have IS. To this day I never had a use for it.

24
Canon General / Re: More Canon Store Information
« on: January 14, 2013, 01:14:01 PM »
What would be awesome would be to have service centers at each of these stores.

25
Lenses / Re: Going to get the 24-70 2.8 II. Want a 70-200 as well
« on: January 12, 2013, 02:05:34 PM »
Just pick up the non-IS version. It goes for $1200 right now. It's also arguably sharper than the II.

26
I'm glad Canon doesn't. I want all my lenses to work on all my bodies.

27
No thanks, I'll stick to my Olympus OMD E-M5.

28
EOS Bodies / Re: Canon Cannot Keep Screwing It's Customers Over
« on: January 06, 2013, 09:25:14 AM »
Some of these comparisons and smart a$$ comments about depreciation are ridiculous.  I don't think the OP should have started an entire thread dedicated to this and been so dramatic about it, but I can sympathize with his feelings on the 5D3 and 5D3 only.  You all act like the drop is completely normal but name one other piece of Canon gear that dropped that much that fast?

Of course depreciation is to be expected, but I think the 5D3's drop was different.   The price of the 5D Mark II dropped maybe $200 the first 2 YEARS it was out.  And if the 5D3 price pattern is the norm then why is the 1DX not under $5k now?  It's the same price it was at it's release.

Not to mention there was a poll before the Mark III was shipped asking about when it would drop below $3000 and the earliest answers were around Xmas and even those people got laughed at.  Nowhere did anyone say that it would drop to $2500 in 7 months or anywhere close to that.  And why would they think that it would? 

I don't think anyone here is stupid enough to believe their electronics won't ever depreciate, but most aren't complaining about the depreciation itself, just how quickly it happened.  And I think a lot of the people being pricks about it are just trying to scorn the early adopters to make themselves feel better about waiting. 

I don't care either way, I paid almost $3800 for mine and still think it's a great camera.  But if you had told me I could save $1600 if I buy a refurb in 7 months, or $800 waiting 5 months, I would have considered waiting.  But now I know for the future, lesson learned.

You got ripped off by both Canon an Uncle Sam. A little shopping around at launch or waiting a few years would have helped you save some money  ;D

29
Lenses / Re: EF 24-70 f/2.8L IS Exists as a Working Prototype [CR2]
« on: December 21, 2012, 01:06:56 PM »
Tamrons are junk. They're good starter lenses but that's about it.

30
Lenses / Re: EF 24-70 f/2.8L IS Exists as a Working Prototype [CR2]
« on: December 20, 2012, 04:25:28 PM »
Looking forward to get the non-IS version when it drops in price when the IS version comes out. I've been shooting for 15 years and have never had a need for IS.

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 12