October 22, 2014, 01:03:18 AM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - iso79

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 12
16
Lenses / Re: Canon EF 24-70 f/2.8L II
« on: March 01, 2013, 03:58:45 PM »
The Mark II is totally worth it. Ridiculously sharp. Sold my Mark I to help pay for it. Ended up only paying $1200 for the Mark II.

17
Reviews / Re: Review - Canon Speedlite 600EX-RT
« on: February 26, 2013, 07:03:36 PM »
An efficient light weight lighting kit is more valuable than an expensive heavy lens that you will rarely use.

18
Reviews / Re: Review - Canon Speedlite 600EX-RT
« on: February 26, 2013, 06:43:17 PM »
I picked up three 600EX-RTs and the STE-3 transmitter. They work great. Totally worth the money. I don't miss my 580EX II, Lumpro flashes, Cybersyncs with synch cable hell at all.

19
Lighting / Do 600EX-RT not work with Cybersyncs?
« on: February 10, 2013, 04:09:04 PM »
I plugged one in to my new 600EX-RT flash but can't seem to trigger it. Is there a certain mode I have to be work? It works fine on my old 580EXII.

20
Lenses / Re: 70-200 is ii vs non is
« on: February 08, 2013, 12:16:44 PM »
The non-IS is supposedly sharper. Get the IS version if you have the arms of a body builder with the shaky hands of an old person.

21
Lenses / Re: Roger Buys a Camera System: A 24-70mm System Comparison
« on: February 08, 2013, 11:14:59 AM »
This is why I don't bother with most 3rd party lenses except Zeiss lenses.

22
Reviews / Re: Review - Canon EF 50 f/1.2L
« on: January 31, 2013, 09:14:44 AM »
Such an overrated lens!  ;D

23
Lenses / Re: Canon EF 24-70 f/2.8L II is a Peerless Performer
« on: January 28, 2013, 09:43:56 AM »
It's great no doubt, but I have to pay 3650 USD to get one, so I simply have to live vicariously through the people who own it ::)

Just start saving up. I sold my Mark I on Craig's List for 1200 so the Mark II only ended up costing me 1k.

24
Lenses / Re: Canon 24-70 ii - another superlative
« on: January 16, 2013, 04:32:57 PM »
I love primes as the next person but having to change them all the time is annoying. Sometimes causing you to miss shots and interrupt the flow of your shoot.

25
Lenses / Re: 135L vs 85L vs 70-200L II
« on: January 16, 2013, 03:10:01 PM »
Buy all three seriously.

26
Lenses / Re: Canon 24-70 ii - another superlative
« on: January 16, 2013, 10:38:54 AM »
I did the same thing and sold my Mark I. So I only had to pay $1200 for it  8) I'm loving the prime quality sharpness. It was totally worth the money. I don't care if it doesn't have IS. To this day I never had a use for it.

27
Canon General / Re: More Canon Store Information
« on: January 14, 2013, 01:14:01 PM »
What would be awesome would be to have service centers at each of these stores.

28
Lenses / Re: Going to get the 24-70 2.8 II. Want a 70-200 as well
« on: January 12, 2013, 02:05:34 PM »
Just pick up the non-IS version. It goes for $1200 right now. It's also arguably sharper than the II.

29
I'm glad Canon doesn't. I want all my lenses to work on all my bodies.

30
No thanks, I'll stick to my Olympus OMD E-M5.

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 12