July 25, 2014, 12:14:39 PM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - iso79

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 12
46
EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: Canon Announces the Canon EOS 6D DSLR
« on: September 17, 2012, 10:34:23 AM »
Either way it's going to sell like hotcakes.

To whom, exactly?

n00bs, students, parents?

Just because somebody buys doesn't mean they don't know what they're doing. A body is only one piece in a whole ecosystem. The GPS and Wifi might be nice to have integrated and you can complain all you want about the specs but it's not really that bad. There's a couple things that would of been nice to have but I'm sure this camera will take some great pictures.

Exactly. Most gearheads bitching and whining about the specs don't know how to take good pictures let alone know how to shoot in manual.

47
EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: Canon Announces the Canon EOS 6D DSLR
« on: September 17, 2012, 10:13:51 AM »
Either way it's going to sell like hotcakes.

To whom, exactly?

n00bs, students, parents?

48
Price drop or no, it wouldn't have made a difference since I live in NYC and would have had to pay taxes on top of it. Luckily I bought my Mark III from Crutchfield with no taxes and free shipping when it first came out.

49
EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: Canon Announces the Canon EOS 6D DSLR
« on: September 17, 2012, 08:55:27 AM »
Either way it's going to sell like hotcakes.

50
Lenses / How much to sell my used 24-70mm L for?
« on: September 16, 2012, 08:19:36 AM »
So I'm saving up for the II and was wondering how much I could get away selling my 24-70mm L I for since they're discontinued. It shows some wear but still works pretty good.

51
EOS Bodies / Re: Cool Stuff - PimpYourCam.com
« on: August 10, 2012, 01:59:07 PM »
Only Nikon shooters would do this.

52
All you need is a tripod.

53
The photos of the Mark III straight out of the camera were so much better than the II in terms of IQ, exposure, and color rendition.

In-camera jpg shots, or do you mean straight RAW conversions on a computer?

Straight RAW from the camera.

54
It was interesting to say the least. Shot with both cameras set to the same settings with the 85mm f/1.2 and 24-70mm. The photos of the Mark III straight out of the camera were so much better than the II in terms of IQ, exposure, and color rendition. When some people say there's not much difference in IQ I have to say they're full of it. The handling of the Mark III just felt so much better and more substantial except for the new joystick on the new grip. It just felt awkward. It will take some time to get used to.

55
Lenses / Re: Canon EF 24-70 f/2.8L II Delayed Again
« on: July 05, 2012, 09:42:07 AM »
More time for me to save up  8)

56
Speedlites, Printers, Accessories / Re: BG-E11 Delayed
« on: June 30, 2012, 06:40:03 PM »
I ordered mine from Amazon yesterday for $312 and it just shipped today.  8)

58
EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: Canon EOS-1D X Review
« on: June 27, 2012, 02:15:11 PM »
The only thing Nikon beat Canon with the D800 is the megapixels and price (not enough for me and many photographers to switch sides). Everything else, the Mark III does much better.

59
EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: Canon EOS-1D X Review
« on: June 27, 2012, 10:54:40 AM »
People complained about the 5D Mark III sensor?  ::)

60
EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: Canon EOS-1D X Hitting Retailers
« on: June 21, 2012, 11:39:17 AM »
I love the packaging  8)

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 12