October 02, 2014, 07:13:27 AM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - dilbert

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 199
16
What next - Canon belt buckles from D&G for your camera strap?

17
Landscape / Re: Mountains, Lakes and Rivers
« on: September 28, 2014, 01:40:27 AM »
Rundle Mountain as seen across Vermilion Lake, Banff NP, AB

For the mountain to be the subject of the picture it is awfully small bump.

Maybe just title this "Vermillion Lake"

18
EOS Bodies / Re: More Talk of an October Announcement of a DSLR [CR1]
« on: September 28, 2014, 01:37:58 AM »
To all the people threatening to jump from Canon to Sony/Nikon...

When you bought your Canon camera, it was obviously because you needed/wanted its performance.  It was good enough.  Now suddenly it's not good enough?  Did it deteriorate in quality?  You bought a camera because its performance was what sought, and now its performance (which is the exact same as when you bought it) is not good enough?  Y'all make me laugh.  Hah.

So what you're saying is that all of the people that own a 7D don't need to update to a 7DII?
That if you own a 5DII you should never have updated to a 5DIII?
That's there no reason to upgrade from 60D to 70D?
and so on.

If you are going to argue against changing vendor because the camera bought was "good enough" at the time then that is also an argument against upgrading without changing vendor. Is that really your argument?

19
EOS Bodies / Re: More Talk of an October Announcement of a DSLR [CR1]
« on: September 27, 2014, 01:50:07 PM »
...
People match their needs with what they can get. Day by day. The day Canon launched the 5D the Nikon crowd demanded a FF camera. The day Canon launched the 5DII the Nikon crowd demanded a film-capable Nikon DSLR.
...

You got something wrong here. Nikon's D90 (27-08-2008) was the first DSLR that did video, Canon's 5DII (17-09-2008) was the second.

20
EOS Bodies / Re: More Talk of an October Announcement of a DSLR [CR1]
« on: September 27, 2014, 01:46:09 PM »
As a 12 year Canon DSLR shooter and someone whose shooting style has changed over the last few years, I'm kind of tired of waiting for Canon. When I bought my 5D3 in the launch month, it was fantastic and I was very happy with it. It was a nice evolutionary step up from my 5D2. It also had a great focusing system that worked for the airshow stuff I like to do in the spring and fall. For some of the subjects I shoot today it's still a great choice.

However over the last almost 3 years, the subjects I shoot most often have changed and my shooting style has evolved. I'm doing a lot more natural landscape and architectural exterior stuff now and Canon has simply not kept up with those new requirements. As I look at my evolving needs for high dynamic range and detail, Canon does not make a camera body that fills those needs; they have ceded that market to competitors.

Last spring I was ready to dump all my Canon gear and switch over to a Nikon D610 & D800e and then I saw the option with the Sony a7R. It gave me the same sensor performance the Nikon D800e would offer but also allowed me to keep using my Canon glass investment which I'm extremely happy with. It's certainly rigged up a little with the Metabones adapter but it created a 'bridge' for me for one more year in hopes that Canon would finally start paying attention to that segment of the market and deliver something interesting. On my last 3 dedicated photography trips including one last weekend to Montana, the Canon never got a single click on the shutter- every shot was taken with the Sony with Canon glass on it.

However, I'm not happy with this Franken-Camera model and won't stay with it much longer. I love the image quality I get out of the Sony when it's dropped on a tripod, but it's just not a practical choice for much handheld. It's also way too slow at absolutely everything it does so it's going to have to go. If the subject is moving, it's terrible.

If by spring of next year, Canon has not delivered a viable competitive solution I'll be jumping platforms and have one hell of an epic eBay auction. They have just ceded that part of the market to competitors and have given no indications that they care about that space.

The key word above is 'delivered' not just talked about something they are thinking about. I won't be prepared to play a stalling game to drag it out even further. If they have not shipped something competitive with a D810 or similar on both features and price I'll likely jumping ship.

This will be me in the next 12 months, 100% guranteed.

I've been doing Canon for about twice as long, if not more and brand loyalty isn't paying off.

21
EOS Bodies / Re: More Talk of an October Announcement of a DSLR [CR1]
« on: September 26, 2014, 03:09:56 PM »
To all the people threatening to jump from Canon to Sony/Nikon...

When you bought your Canon camera, it was obviously because you needed/wanted its performance.  It was good enough.  Now suddenly it's not good enough?  Did it deteriorate in quality?  You bought a camera because its performance was what sought, and now its performance (which is the exact same as when you bought it) is not good enough?  Y'all make me laugh.  Hah.

I bought my Canon DSLR because it worked with the lenses I already had from using film and back in the film days, you didn't buy cameras based on sensor performance. At the time I switched over from film to digital, Canon was at the top of the DxO rankings for DSLRs in APS-C and FF.

22
EOS Bodies / Re: More Talk of an October Announcement of a DSLR [CR1]
« on: September 26, 2014, 12:01:02 PM »
So?

I've seen other websites mentioning that there are rumors going around about other Canon bodies (esp. mirrorless variants) and yet there's nothing here. Do I take this to mean that CR just doesn't publish them (because they're CR0) or that people just don't send CR all rumor info? And if it is the latter then that definitely opens things up to ppl not sending rumors to CR about a high MP Canon FF DSLR.

23
EOS Bodies / Re: Poll: Would you buy a high MP Canon EOS 5DIV?
« on: September 26, 2014, 11:54:03 AM »
I am fine with 20 to 24 MP.
I don't care for more than 30 MP because for me it only costs disk space and makes pixel peepers happy - or even not.
Same MP, better high and low ISO performance, maybe some DR on top and I'm fine.

To say it in other words:
The 5D4 must have a real big improvement in IQ (not pixel resolution) that you can recognize at once in real world usage.
Minor improvements (half an stop ISO here, little less noise there) are not enough.
Otherwise I am not interested at all.

+1

24
It's a direct result of trying to make the WiFi feature easy to use by anyone. Problem is that they made it easy to use by everyone.

25
It's been a rule / policy for years that organized groups or professional image and movie-makers require a permit, pay a fee, and hire a ranger to accompany production crews on a shoot.

The ranger serves as a guide in sensitive areas, and observes that the proper environmental protection rules are followed, and that 'out-of-bound' restrictions.   
...

On one occasion I was at Yosemite and at the same time and place as a Canon enthusiasts group. The leader of the group was someone from Canon and he was effectively taking a "class". The Canon employee was very mindful of instructing people not to go into certain parts of the surrounds as it was officially "out of bounds" and that if they did then Canon risked being not allowed to take people on photographic tours of Yosemite.

At that time I saw many individuals go into parts of the park that the Canon person could not allow people under their guidance to.

26
EOS Bodies / Re: Poll: Would you buy a high MP Canon EOS 5DIV?
« on: September 26, 2014, 06:19:33 AM »
Add this option:

Only if the sensor resolves the noise and DR issues present in the 5DIII

27
EOS Bodies / Re: Canon Says Higher Resolution Sensors Are Coming Soon
« on: September 26, 2014, 01:54:50 AM »
...
It's rather preachy, like religion.  Sorry, not all of us need to push shadows 5 stops in post.   
...

The noise in Canon images is always there, even in the non-shadow reasons.

28
Canon General / Re: DRones vs. anti-DRones: how to resolve the controversy
« on: September 26, 2014, 01:16:04 AM »
Option 1 wouldn't work, DRones are anti-Canon as much as anything. There is no possibility of Canon making something good enough to satisfy them.

No.
Anti-Canon = everything Canon does is bad.
Canon fanboy = everything Canon does is good.
Neutral = Canon is best at many things but not everything.

Anti-Canon peoole wouldn't care if Canon used Sony Sensors or not. They would just buy/promote Nikon or Sony cameras and be done with.
The people that care to complain about Canon, do so because they recognize Canon has the best cameras, only does not have the best sensors. They get frustrated because they would like to have the best of all worlds, but they cannot, they have to choose, either the best camera (read AF, UI, ergonomics, reliability, etc) and best lenses, or the best sensor (read DR, low light sensitivity, noise).

I maintain that the real DRones actually are anti-Canon. As soon as the feature they're currently complaining about is fixed, they'll find something else. They hide their anti-Canon motivations with the odd logical statement, but you can be sure the complaining will never cease.

It's interesting that you say this.

Before the Exmor sensor came out, I was bitching about how noisey the 5D Mark II's sensor was. Then Exmor came out and I had reason to bitch about *both* the noise *AND* the DR.

If Canon fix _only_ the DR in the 5DIV (guess) then I'll go back to being noisey about readout noise.

If on the other hand Canon deliver a sensor that performs as well as the Exmor in the D8x0 today then I'll just bitch about not having enough megapixels (about 80 to 90 megapixels is what I'd call sufficient for my needs.)

29
Canon General / Re: DRones vs. anti-DRones: how to resolve the controversy
« on: September 26, 2014, 01:12:04 AM »
Anti-Canon = everything Canon does is bad.
Canon fanboy = everything Canon does is good.
Neutral = Canon is best at many things but not everything.

Ok, so that makes me Neutral.   :)
Speaking of "Fair and Balanced", where *IS* dilbert today?  He missed the first page of the high MP sensor thread . . .

Getting work done.

30
EOS Bodies / Re: Canon Says Higher Resolution Sensors Are Coming Soon
« on: September 25, 2014, 09:51:12 AM »
I gotta say up front that I'm a news junkie and watch tons of interviews...DPReview's interview was just about the absolute worst that I've ever read.  I was as if both of them was reading from a script, sans any kind of follow-up questions.

It would be interesting to see some sort of sales breakdown and cost analysis of Canon products...they do sell the most.  Trying to please the folks like us might not rate that high on their priority list.

Just how many interviews do you think aren't scripted or where question matter is agreed on beforehand?

You think someone like the President would go on TV if there was a chance of some random question being asked that he wouldn't know the answer to? (Not at all impossible.)

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 199