September 01, 2014, 07:15:24 AM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - dilbert

Pages: 1 ... 115 116 [117] 118 119 ... 189
1741
PowerShot Cameras / Will the S100 successor have a larger sensor?
« on: June 06, 2012, 08:10:30 AM »
Will Canon increase the sensor size of the S100 in its successor to deliver more MP with better IQ rather than just more MP?

1742
Landscape / Re: Venus transit
« on: June 06, 2012, 05:05:19 AM »
Just before it exited the sun...

1743
Third Party Manufacturers / Re: My D800 Review
« on: June 06, 2012, 04:53:26 AM »
Over at Luminous Landscape, they went with the Tamron 70-300 VC and the Sigma 120-300/2.8.

http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/cameras/nikon_d800__e_initial_impressions.shtml

1744
Both of these reviews make it quite clear that the Tamron is quite easily the equal of the Canon 24-70 MkI.

I'd suggest going to a store and trying out different Tamron 24-70's if you are having trouble.

1745
CanonTamron

1746
From ephotozine...

CanonTamron
24mm
35mm
70mm

1747
Landscape / Re: Venus transit
« on: June 06, 2012, 12:14:54 AM »
Slept in...

1748
EOS Bodies - For Stills / DxO compares the 5D Mark III with the D800
« on: June 05, 2012, 05:07:12 AM »
Even if you think DxO don't know anything and their testing is rubbish, you should have a read of this as they go into more detail about their testing, specifically the signal-to-noise testing:

http://www.dxomark.com/index.php/Publications/DxOMark-Reviews/Canon-5D-Mark-III-Review/Sensor-Comparison

1749
EOS Bodies / Re: What's your acceptable price for the 1Dx
« on: June 04, 2012, 07:36:40 PM »
At this point, given that Canon can't deliver, don't you think it is a bit early to be discussing price?

1750
EOS Bodies / Re: Canon EOS 70D & 3D Prediction from Japan
« on: June 04, 2012, 12:39:03 PM »
WTF do they need to put the "3D" series in a 1D-like body?

Can't they deliver us a 3D in a body like the EOS 3 series?

Vertical rotation isn't absolutely required...

Or is this just to justify putting it in a more expensive price bracket?

1751
Tamron is more like all purpose workaround lens with very good, but not great IQ.

The center sharpness is outstanding with nearly every focal length and f-stop reaching well into the "excellent" category.

Aside from the "onion bokeh", this Tamron lens has better IQ than Canon's 24-105/f4 "L". And they're about the same price.

To put this in shopping terms, instead of buying the Canon, you buy the Tamron lens, get better IQ and an extra f-stop of light.

What's not to love about that?

1752
EOS Bodies / Re: Odds & Ends - Mirrorless [CR1]
« on: June 01, 2012, 12:14:53 PM »
Significant announcement #1 - New mirrorless camera
Significant announcement #2 - Shipping date of 1DX for retail customers

1753
EOS Bodies / Re: Canon EOS-1D X Delays [CR2]
« on: May 31, 2012, 10:08:53 AM »
What I heard is the reflex mirror problem because of the 14fps continious shoot

Previously I imagined it to be the AF at f/8 issue but if they've problems like this then that'll do it.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     

1754
Lenses / Re: Bokeh...is the look getting dated?
« on: May 31, 2012, 10:04:15 AM »
Many or even most people have a point and shoot camera with a small sensor, and a huge depth of field.  I've bought little used DSLR's from many who just felt that it was out of focus due to the shallow depth of field, they preferred the everything in focus look.
 
So, I think you might be right, the average casual point and shoot person has been trained to expect everything to be in focus, and they are uncomfortable to the point of thinking something is defective with a shallow depth of field.

+1 on this.

There's a similar issue with audio - so many young folks expect good quality audio to sound like MP3s and are uncomfortable when they hear real fidelity that comes from a CD.

1755
EOS Bodies / Re: Canon EOS-1D X Delays [CR2]
« on: May 31, 2012, 05:07:17 AM »
Maybe we'll have red af points and f8 in the revised version.

My money would be on this too.

Pages: 1 ... 115 116 [117] 118 119 ... 189