September 24, 2014, 12:49:13 AM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - fugu82

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 11
1
Software & Accessories / Re: How do you carry your tripod around?
« on: September 16, 2014, 05:58:48 PM »
I have discovered that just tucking a leg of my TVC-24L into my Think Tank belt works fine. If you keep it behind your hip it doesn't hit your legs, and is easily accessible. Would get uncomfortable with something a lot heavier, tho.

2
EOS Bodies / Re: Apple Watch....
« on: September 10, 2014, 12:34:02 PM »
Well, I don't miss wifi on my 5D3 but I really want that watch.......

3
Canon EF Zoom Lenses / Re: Canon EF 16-35mm f/4L IS USM
« on: September 01, 2014, 11:14:02 AM »
Wow! Such great shots, everyone. This also plays well with infrared, which is why I dumped my 2.8 for it. EOS-M converted to 590 nm with 16-35 f/4.

5
EOS Bodies / Re: Just got my 1dx back from Canon with a dirty sensor?
« on: August 18, 2014, 10:00:22 PM »
If your lenses look clean and the dirt pattern is roughly the same with different ones, then it's on the sensor. :-\

You can check directly by following the manual sensor cleaning procedure with a full battery and looking at the sensor with a lighted loupe or flashlight + magnifier. Dust is visible but usually pretty tiny. If it's not sticky, like drops of lube, you might be able to carefully blast it away with a rocket blower. Good luck.

6
Hmmmm. The 23 is starting to like a Goldilocks height for me......

7
Thanks so much for all the insightful replies; still somewhat undecided. It is tough to buy something like this sight unseen.

8
I have come to the point that I want to upgrade from my current tripod. I have a Manfrotto 190CXPRO4 with an 054 head converted to A/S that is getting pretty beat up. I use it primarily for landscape and night photography. Heaviest rig is a 5D3 and 100-400. I am a 5' 4" older lady, and don't need a bunch of height or weight.

So I need advice from the RRS gurus out there. What height of legs should I consider? I like the travel-friendly TVC-24, but am afraid that it would be too short even for me on uneven ground. Would it?

What RRS [or other] ballhead? I used to have a BH-40 but it seemed to have a lot of creep. Maybe I was too afraid of over-tightening. A screw-knob clamp might be better than a lever for me, since I have plates and L-brackets from everybody.

Thanx in advance for your help!

9
Software & Accessories / Re: Rain protection for 5D3 and lens
« on: July 14, 2014, 05:44:25 PM »
I have used the Op/Techs and Storm Jacket during some pretty heavy rain w/o harm to my 5D3. I stuff the little Op/Techs in all my bags; great insurance for unexpected rain or dust. I have the Kata, too, but it's so bulky I've never brought it anywhere.

10
Lenses / Re: Canon EF 16-35 F/4L IS -- Reviews are trickling in...
« on: July 06, 2014, 03:12:37 PM »
I am seriously considering trading in my 16-35II f/2.8 on the new f/4 IS, simply because the f/4 reportedly plays very nicely with IR [unlike the miserably awful 2.8 in IR]. I don't expect to miss that stop, and will get a dual-purpose UWA.

11
Photography Technique / Re: Taking HDR shots
« on: June 30, 2014, 12:10:39 PM »
Nik Software's HDR Efex Pro is awesome.
Totally agree with the previous posters on the need for subtlety in processing HDRs. Ideally, viewers should not be able to easily tell that the image was bracketed.

12
EOS-M / Re: M+22mm for Travel/Street?
« on: June 27, 2014, 08:11:55 PM »
The combo works for me.
I missed the viewfinder, too, so bought an old Leica Imarect VIOOH, which looks kinda crazy but functions quite well.

13
EOS-M / Re: Got my new IR eos-m!
« on: June 12, 2014, 09:35:38 PM »
Sounds very cool! I have a lot of fun with my converted 40D. It would be interesting to see how well the M-series lenses play with IR; that could make M a tempting item to buy strictly as an IR camera.

14
Glad things finally worked out, and thanx for sharing info on LC. I will keep them in mind if this happens to me.

15
Lenses / Re: 16-35 f/4 IS for infrared?
« on: May 25, 2014, 11:35:09 AM »
Well, I have the 24-70 f/4 IS and the 70-200 f/4 IS, both pretty modern lenses, and they play very nicely with my IR converted 40D. So there is some hope that the new 16-35 f/4 will be better than the 2.8 in that regard. Would be hard to be worse, actually.  :-\

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 11