October 25, 2014, 07:31:23 AM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - sandymandy

Pages: 1 ... 18 19 [20] 21 22 ... 41
286
Lenses / Re: Why no L primes from 14 to 24mm
« on: December 09, 2012, 02:42:21 PM »
14 and 24 are not in between 14 and 24....

Thread says from 14 to 24 not "between".

287
Lenses / Re: Why no L primes from 14 to 24mm
« on: December 09, 2012, 12:43:23 PM »
There is 24mm 1.4L prime and 8-15mm L fisheye.

288
Lenses / Re: 35mm f/2 IS USM available in Japan
« on: December 09, 2012, 04:57:09 AM »
800$ for the 35mm 2.0 IS USM? WOW thats really a lot of cash!

289
Lenses / Re: APS-C lens mm are correct
« on: December 07, 2012, 03:23:33 PM »
I cant understand why this topic always gets discussed so much? a 50mm lens is a 50mm lens

A photo taken from the same position with a FF camera will look like it was taken with a 50mm lens. A photo taken with an APS-C will look like it was taken with an 80mm lens.

Thats all what the crop factor is about and its so easy and clear to understand, why gotta discuss so much?

Its just common to say "equivalent of blabla on APS-C". Maybe its just the wrong term used but so what? everybody knows what it supposed to mean.

290
Canon EF Prime Lenses / Re: Pictures taken with the humble 35 f2
« on: December 04, 2012, 05:32:46 PM »
The church looks like its a rendering, really cool :D im also thinking about getting the 35mm f2 from canon since the other options are too expensive for me and sometimes im just too lazy to use my m42 35mm lens and manual focus with my tiny "keyhole" viewfinder. liveview is not handy for me.

i heard the 35mm f2 is just average but the photos on pixel-peeper dont look bad to me...confused :(

291
Third Party Lenses (Sigma, Tamron, etc.) / Re: Sigma 35mm 1.4
« on: December 04, 2012, 05:30:11 PM »
Wish i had this lens. its really nice. i will just miss my old zeiss 35mm 2.8 minimum focus distance of 18cm (7 inches!).

292
Canon General / Re: What real Pros shoot...
« on: December 04, 2012, 10:52:33 AM »
There are 16mm cinema prime lenses.

293
The one and only lens that I am lusting for right now doesn't even exist.

It is the 14-24L. Canon's equivalent to Nikon's 14-24 - one of the best lenses ever made.

A 16-35 III would also be ok, as long as it is razor sharp across the frame.

Get Nikon to EoS adapter, problem solved :P

Sigma 35mm 1.4
Canon 100 2.8L macro
Canon 50mm 1.2L
Canon 24mm II L



294
Abstract / Re: Goofing around could lead to $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
« on: December 03, 2012, 11:16:17 AM »
Try your hand at film. The entire process. THAT is an art and a craft. Any fool can press a button, move a mouse and a slider. I know  because I can do it ;) (Both film user and self  acclaimed digital fool)

Im also shooting film just dont develop it myself (i guess that was ur point). But i think its a challenge since i cant just post process the hell out of it as easy as with digital.

295
EOS Bodies / Re: Downgrade to crop
« on: December 03, 2012, 09:47:44 AM »
Oh yes bigger and brighter viewfinder is definitly a reason why i wanna go FF as soon as possible. Anytime i jump on my analog EOS im like...ehh....this camera costs 15 euro but has a nicer viewfinder than my digital one...

But i think only 5D and higher got "pentaprism" which is brighter than "pentamirror" that 6D uses if im correct.

If i was you i would go fullframe and get 1,4x TC. Sure u lose light but FF camera lets more light in and 6D or higher offer really good high ISO so it doesnt matter.

The main reason why im annoyed of my APS-C sometimes is that its so hard to get the lenses i want. Sure, there are many lenses but i always gotta calculate the 1,6* factor and suddenly some lenses become not what i really wanted  :'( If i want 50mm i get like ..44mm or 56 or something like this e.g.

296
EOS Bodies / Re: Downgrade to crop
« on: December 03, 2012, 08:38:03 AM »
Hmmm.  I'm considering upgrading my T1i to a 6D, but my 100 2.0 and 200 2.8 give me the perfect focal length for indoor sports.  A 70-200 would likely get me 90%+ of the right focal length for outdoor sports. 
Does it possibly make sense to stick with a crop sensor for telephoto/sports needs and a full frame with a "normal" lens for general photography?

I think many people use a 7D for sports. Other option would be to get 1,4x teleconverter.

297
While i like DPP the layout just doesnt work well for me. LR gives me a better feeling and i think it looks nicer too :)

298
EOS Bodies / Re: 6D Likely Price Trend
« on: December 03, 2012, 08:34:56 AM »
Hi,

My wife is giving birth in July and I will have a 6D by then to take pics of the kid.

My only question is when to buy.  Is it likely that the 6D will drop in price from Dec. 2011 to July 2012?

December 2012 to July 2013, isnt it?

299
Abstract / Re: Goofing around could lead to $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
« on: December 03, 2012, 08:31:12 AM »
I see a Mark Rothko comment coming

+1
One of his paintings sold this year for $86.9 million USD :o

I think its a little different about him because he always paints like "that". I also think it looks more "natural" cuz he has to paint everything himself, choose the colors, the canvas etc.
Ive never seen his paintings in real but i know a lot of famous art pieces just have something special about them thats hard to put in words. Its that magic what makes an artist, the magic that awakes emotions in your hear and puts thoughts in ur brain. Drawings from "Miro" also look easy to make but thats not whats its all about. And its like 100% handcraft.

About abstract photography i think in way too many cases it just looks like somebody clicked randomly around added a lot of scripts or such to get a random final resul that just "looks so damn artsy".

If u just randomly paint around on a canvas im quite sure u wont suddenly come up with a miro or rothko or kandinsky or whatever abstract piece. Digital work doesnt include 100% handcraft imho but a lot of things u can just tell the computer to do and then it will do it. Thats why i think it cant ever be as cool as "real abstract art".

Ive more respect for people creating something so simple i always wonder "omg mr. rothko why didnt i come up with this for the past years??" :)

But sorry that picture i mentioned earlier look totally like a douchebag photoshop job and you could buy lot of leicas for the price it sold for....

300
Lenses / Re: Best Value "Normal" Lens for 6d?
« on: December 02, 2012, 06:28:29 PM »
Best money/IQ value is 50mm 1.8 II.

Pages: 1 ... 18 19 [20] 21 22 ... 41