421
Portrait / Re: 1st photo
« on: August 05, 2012, 05:35:12 AM »
Im sure u didnt help him at all 
May 19, 2013, 12:33:23 PM
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
422
Portrait / Re: Depth of Field, composition and thinking it through...
« on: August 05, 2012, 05:34:17 AM »Now, photos with a "wildlife in its natural environment" focus are getting more attention. Its funny how tastes change.
Probably cuz the environment gets destroyed more and more. U cant be sure today if u can still take photos of wildlife tigers in 10 years for example. Or maybe even certain areas or rain forests.
Not funny i think
423
Portrait / Re: First time at wedding - feedback please
« on: August 05, 2012, 05:29:06 AM »
I think your at mid level. Photos dont look pro but they arent bad also. Thats cool ur on the right way. I like the dance photo the most. Please dont use too much softening especially with males 
424
Portrait / Re: Niece and grandniece (candid)
« on: August 05, 2012, 05:27:28 AM »
The editing looks fine to me. U could have said "nope" also and i would have believed it
Plus i dont mind less details in the tuft. As long as the important aspect gets transported techniques dont matter too much imho.
Plus i dont mind less details in the tuft. As long as the important aspect gets transported techniques dont matter too much imho.
425
EOS Bodies / Re: If Canon wants to kill off Nikon/Sony/Pentax drop APS-C and Go APS-H
« on: August 02, 2012, 08:55:42 AM »
They can drop APS-C when they can deliver a Fullframe in the price Range of the rebels.
426
Portrait / Re: Depth of Field, composition and thinking it through...
« on: July 30, 2012, 06:21:03 AM »
I think the background of the photo doesnt add anything to the image in this case. Its just a tree, some houses and a tower. Plus its blurred also when u check full size. The focus is totally on this girls face and the fence.
But i like ur thinking
I think its just hard in places that we percieve as "normal" to include an environment thats really standing out and gets ones attention. Like in war photography sure u can use lots of DOF because the area alone is totally different than what most of us see on ur daily routes. E.g. 3rd world photos, just the way people live there in poor areas gets to the heart often.
But i like ur thinking
I think its just hard in places that we percieve as "normal" to include an environment thats really standing out and gets ones attention. Like in war photography sure u can use lots of DOF because the area alone is totally different than what most of us see on ur daily routes. E.g. 3rd world photos, just the way people live there in poor areas gets to the heart often.
427
Portrait / Re: Heat Wave! 100 Liters of water + model + sunshine....
« on: July 30, 2012, 02:58:47 AM »
mmm i really like b&w photos with hardcore contrasts 
anyway do u got a darker version of this photo too? mind sharing?
anyway do u got a darker version of this photo too? mind sharing?
428
Portrait / Re: Niece and grandniece (candid)
« on: July 30, 2012, 02:57:28 AM »
did u edit the photo? the kid is like shining 
429
Portrait / Re: Portraits of my GF, Would like feedback!!
« on: July 29, 2012, 11:07:03 AM »As to your editing, I think the untouched originals look much more interesting as well as far more natural.
+1...ur editing just looks too obvious
430
Portrait / Re: Heat Wave! 100 Liters of water + model + sunshine....
« on: July 29, 2012, 11:00:59 AM »
looks kind of overexposed to me
431
Portrait / Re: Candid portraits
« on: July 27, 2012, 04:54:44 AM »
Not sure if this is called candid but i just played around with my 50/1.8 and my friend in the park
432
EOS Bodies / Re: Camera Warfare! Epic battle with Canon Cameras
« on: July 25, 2012, 04:19:14 AM »
Really funny video! Tripod aka mortar, lens cap, flash(bang grenade)
433
Technical Support / Re: M42 Lenses
« on: July 24, 2012, 11:48:24 AM »
well i also read that DF mount n stuff doesnt work with full frame cameras cuz the mirror will be in the way.i think i will just stick with the m42 ones since im not a fan of crop bodies (i got one now)
434
Technical Support / Re: How much space to get to macro?
« on: July 24, 2012, 08:48:25 AM »
i dont think its possible without proper know-how and equpiment to just build some lens converter stuff. just missing a little and the focus is off.
435
Technical Support / Re: M42 Lenses
« on: July 24, 2012, 08:46:48 AM »
Somehow a new world opened in front of my third eye and showed me there are also FD and FL Lenses. Especially something like FL 55mm 1.2 which is a lot cheaper than the EF 50mm 1.2L and makes really good images too.
Ive just seen some kinda expensive converter brass ring...
any experiences with such lenses?
Ive just seen some kinda expensive converter brass ring...
any experiences with such lenses?