Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - sandymandy

Pages: 1 ... 28 29 [30] 31 32 ... 36

436

EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: 1DX ISO 12,800 real-life test

« on: August 08, 2012, 06:16:24 AM »

Quote from: Axilrod on August 08, 2012, 12:37:46 AM

Off topic, and I'm pretty sure I've asked before (but don't think I got an answer), I was curious as to what on Earth you shoot that requires 11 camera bodies and two copies of multiple lenses. Five 7D's? Seriously?

Perhaps he got a photo business and he just ownz all his workers cameras. Or hes a busy reporter in a rush without time to change lenses

437

Portrait / Re: We, The Photographers......Self Portaits..a Who's Who on CR

« on: August 06, 2012, 09:56:19 AM »

Quote from: RayValdez360 on July 30, 2012, 01:54:59 PM

I like being faceless

excellent background haha...so ur the girl or what? i just see a camera face

438

Portrait / Re: Depth of Field, composition and thinking it through...

« on: August 06, 2012, 09:53:33 AM »

last photo looks like judo throw lol

439

Portrait / Re: 1st photo

« on: August 05, 2012, 05:35:12 AM »

Im sure u didnt help him at all

440

Portrait / Re: Depth of Field, composition and thinking it through...

« on: August 05, 2012, 05:34:17 AM »

Quote from: Hillsilly on July 30, 2012, 07:33:38 AM

Now, photos with a "wildlife in its natural environment" focus are getting more attention. Its funny how tastes change.

Probably cuz the environment gets destroyed more and more. U cant be sure today if u can still take photos of wildlife tigers in 10 years for example. Or maybe even certain areas or rain forests.
Not funny i think

441

Portrait / Re: First time at wedding - feedback please

« on: August 05, 2012, 05:29:06 AM »

I think your at mid level. Photos dont look pro but they arent bad also. Thats cool ur on the right way. I like the dance photo the most. Please dont use too much softening especially with males

442

Portrait / Re: Niece and grandniece (candid)

« on: August 05, 2012, 05:27:28 AM »

The editing looks fine to me. U could have said "nope" also and i would have believed it

Plus i dont mind less details in the tuft. As long as the important aspect gets transported techniques dont matter too much imho.

443

EOS Bodies / Re: If Canon wants to kill off Nikon/Sony/Pentax drop APS-C and Go APS-H

« on: August 02, 2012, 08:55:42 AM »

They can drop APS-C when they can deliver a Fullframe in the price Range of the rebels.

444

Portrait / Re: Depth of Field, composition and thinking it through...

« on: July 30, 2012, 06:21:03 AM »

I think the background of the photo doesnt add anything to the image in this case. Its just a tree, some houses and a tower. Plus its blurred also when u check full size. The focus is totally on this girls face and the fence.

But i like ur thinking

I think its just hard in places that we percieve as "normal" to include an environment thats really standing out and gets ones attention. Like in war photography sure u can use lots of DOF because the area alone is totally different than what most of us see on ur daily routes. E.g. 3rd world photos, just the way people live there in poor areas gets to the heart often.