November 22, 2014, 04:10:43 AM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - sandymandy

Pages: 1 ... 37 38 [39] 40 41
571
EOS Bodies / Re: The Big Megapixel Body in 2013?
« on: April 19, 2012, 12:41:43 PM »
Yes but the haters say "why u need 36 MP if u downsize anyway?". Well i think its a BIG advantage being able to downsize much. If it leads to better IQ in the end...who cares? It just makes using the clone stamp a lot easier for example. Which reduces time needed for post processing and so it saves time totally that u can use on something else. Its just an advantage no matter what.

Still i stick to Canon cuz i just love their primes :)

572
EOS Bodies / Re: Canon is getting owned in sensor technology
« on: April 19, 2012, 12:37:47 PM »
Same procedure as every year. I wonder how its possible that people take good photos since the invention of photography. Reading here always seems like last years cameras are producing bad images.

Im going so far to say that if u see some award winning photo on the internet somewhere u cant even tell if it was taken with a nikon or canon or probably something else unless u read the exif information...

573
EOS Bodies / Re: The Big Megapixel Body in 2013?
« on: April 19, 2012, 12:20:15 PM »
I like the idea of having a Canon high MP body. I shoot mainly portraits and i think high MP are good for this as u can retouch and resize larger images just much easier than small ones.
And generally downsizing large images gives off more detailed shots and less noticable noise imho.

I also think Canon should make a more clear path regarding their cameras. I have the impression they want to produce some kind of all-in-all-wonder camera thats good for everything. My impression is that just confuses the customers as they only wonder "so which camera i need now???" cuz different models have so much in common.

574
EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: 350D/Rebel XT Upgrade Thoughts
« on: April 17, 2012, 12:17:54 PM »
When I am working with shallow dof, I don't want the camera choosing what to focus on.

So go manual focus or chose a focus point manually and then only use that one for autofocus. I dont really understand the problem.

575
EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: 5DIII same ISO performance as 5DII
« on: April 17, 2012, 12:16:29 PM »
Im 100% sure if we would get a square sensor soon that u can choose aspect ratio settings in the camera.

If your earning ur living by photography it shouldnt matter what shape the sensor has cuz u post process all images anyway for ur customers. Just crop to 3:2 if necessary.

576
Black & White / Re: Black & White
« on: April 16, 2012, 12:12:50 PM »
I didnt mean to offend you.

The cats in my image cant stay much longer at my home, so if anybody in Germany is interested in owning them, send me a message.

577
Black & White / Re: Black & White
« on: April 16, 2012, 06:10:04 AM »
That is not B/W but Sepia or something.

My new pets, owner died so i took them instead of the animal shelter.

Critique welcome as always:P

578
EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: AF point patterns?
« on: April 15, 2012, 05:41:10 AM »
I got a 1100D and a 50mm lens. When i hold my Camera vertical i can put 2 focus points directly over a persons eyes.

579
Found on a website:



http://www.leica-boss.com/ken-rockwell/

funny to read :P

hope it wasnt posted yet.

580
Black & White / Re: So..what sucks about this shot?
« on: April 12, 2012, 12:53:02 PM »
Well, one of my weaknesses is that im having a really hard time abandoning something or someone even if its not important objectivly. So no matter what i will check back here many times per day. But i think i shouldnt try to read here when my brain is not fully awake :P
I will post more pics in about 2 weeks so let the gaaames begiiiin.

581
Black & White / Re: So..what sucks about this shot?
« on: April 12, 2012, 07:37:30 AM »
Im confused. Is ur comment sarcastic about something i wrote? Or is it just meant to be funny. Im feeling a bit retarded because im not sure what u really mean. Or did u write that cuz i said "this website is funny" ? I mean the website in the link i got.

582
Black & White / Re: So..what sucks about this shot?
« on: April 11, 2012, 02:34:07 AM »
go here http://youarenotaphotographer.com/ and I know you'll feel better about your photo. :)


This website is really funny! Thanks :)

Ill never do wedding photography i think. Im such a really slow photographer. U can call me slowpoke!
Oh and its not a "baby" in my photo :P She is 4 years old.
Heres the original resized. I think i should have used a more closed aperture.

583
EOS Bodies / Re: T3i Showing up \
« on: April 10, 2012, 08:07:15 AM »
Well i just got into photography lately and just bought myself a 1100D cuz i didnt want to wait for the 650D anymore. Plus the 1100D is a lot cheaper and i really dont care about the body quality. Its not as bad as people always say online imho. I guess many people just repeat what they heard and cuz theyre so influenced by online talk they instantly say "uhh this camera feels so cheap" when they touch it in reality.
Im a really slow photographer too :3

Uhm anyway hope the 650D brings some new nice features and isnt just some crappy update (and the new feature is...longer battery life! and 0,5 MP more!!! .......................   ) Hope its not mirrorless too.





584
Black & White / Re: So..what sucks about this shot?
« on: April 10, 2012, 08:01:51 AM »
okay, thank yall. Sadly my mission of taking photos on the easter brunch event didnt work out at all. Most people didnt want shots to be taken so i just gave up and enjoyed the brunch instead :P

585
Black & White / Re: Black & White
« on: April 08, 2012, 12:29:04 PM »
Mailbox behind his head is mehhh :( And some lens dust detected :P

Pages: 1 ... 37 38 [39] 40 41