March 01, 2015, 07:35:54 AM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - sandymandy

Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 7 ... 41
Canon EF Prime Lenses / Re: Canon EF 40mm f/2.8 STM "Pancake"
« on: August 29, 2013, 02:44:48 AM »
Yeah its really a porncake lens!!

EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: 6d Highest Usable Iso?
« on: August 29, 2013, 02:43:53 AM »
I think its just physical reasons. Bigger sensors just have less noise cuz the pixels arent so densly together and they just catch more light. Im sure there are other reasons too but i dont think Canon wants to push people to FF. APS-C should earn them more cash than FF.

Canon EF Prime Lenses / Re: Canon EF 50mm f/1.2L USM
« on: August 29, 2013, 02:34:30 AM »
Just put some talkum inside the lens mount and blow it away with a hot fan. It will rip the dust particles away with it :) Worked like a charm for me.

Be happy ur not one of those unlucky guys who got an insect inside their tft screen!! it happened to me once only...but i was so mad some black pixels moving around -.-turned off screen and luckily the insect decided to leave when i came back next day :)

Lenses / Re: How to clean lenses ?
« on: August 26, 2013, 09:20:19 AM »

Be careful about joking like that.  Some folks have actually cleaned computer keyboards in the dishwasher.  You can't really do that with lenses because you'd end up with water spots on the internal elements, but somebody might not realize you're kidding and might actually try it.  That would translate to one really expensive cleaning, particularly given that Canon would no doubt disclaim any warranty coverage because of "water damage".  :)

good that i dont live in the USA :P heard microwaves there even say to not dry ur pets inside?! lold

Im using my t-shirt to clean the lenses :D srsly its the most less sensitive part of ur camera system :P sensor...totally different story.

EOS-M / Re: Mount EF, EF-S or L lens on EOS-M --- Your thought???
« on: August 26, 2013, 09:19:14 AM »
AS long as he delivers the quality i want the heck i care what my (wedding) photographer is using.

TBH need more Eos-M lenses :) Its just kinda silly to buy a really small EoS and then putting on these monster lenses from the big body boys...

Third Party Manufacturers / Re: Big Sigma Primes [CR2]
« on: August 26, 2013, 09:15:55 AM »
Canon teles are F______ beast, just get them :)

Lenses / Re: Which L Lens to start with?
« on: August 26, 2013, 09:15:07 AM »
24mm 1.4

Canon EF Prime Lenses / Re: Canon EF 100mm f/2.8L Macro IS USM
« on: August 25, 2013, 03:55:08 AM »
Combining two of my hobbies:

Hope ur hobby is engraving not using guns :P

Canon EF Prime Lenses / Re: Canon EF 100mm f/2.8L Macro IS USM
« on: August 25, 2013, 03:53:57 AM »
...and a flash is quite useful in macro photography too...

Canon General / Re: Where's the competition for the 24-105?
« on: August 20, 2013, 12:52:52 PM »
Theres no announcement for an update and even if there was an announcement it would still take over 1 year for the newer version to be released. So nothing to worry. Lenses dont lose their value fast anyway. Some never :)

or call it BuS or sth... ^^

Maybe because there are plenty of 50s but not many different 24mm lenses :)

EOS Bodies / Re: The last Canon crop sensor - ever
« on: August 15, 2013, 03:41:20 AM »

I disagree. Resolution is not measured by the number of pixels.

So i can say a FF sensor with 300 pixels and a FF sensor with 21 MegaPixels have the same resolution if its not about the pixels.
The camera sensors are made out of pixels so how u wanna measure resolution in another way if the camera sees the world all in pixels and nothing else?!

EOS Bodies / Re: Canon 6D Under-Exposing?
« on: August 15, 2013, 03:30:28 AM »
I think it gotta do with the lens. Using my m42 lenses in AV mode sometimes the exposure is off.
Never had any problems with the newer EF lenses

Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 7 ... 41