April 20, 2014, 06:12:41 PM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - aznable

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 15
46
EOS Bodies / Re: Canon EOS 7D Mark II Spec List [CR2]
« on: February 23, 2013, 04:20:07 AM »

per i moderatori:
ma questa specie di troll molesto non è ancora stato bandito da questo forum?

c'è un moderatore che parla italiano?

of course not, but i wanted to use just italian for the entire message ;)

47
EOS Bodies / Re: Canon EOS 7D Mark II Spec List [CR2]
« on: February 22, 2013, 09:21:14 AM »
Hope it has a 'direct print' button.

canon.it

MIRINO

Tipo
Pentaspecchio

Copertura (verticale/orizzontale)
Circa 95%

Ingrandimento
Circa 0,80x¹

Campo visivo
Circa 21mm (from eyepiece lens center)

Correzione diottrie
Da -2,5 a +0,5 m-1 (diottrie)

Schermo di messa a fuoco
Fisso

Specchio
Metà specchio a ritorno rapido (trasmissione: rapporto di riflesso 40:60, no cut-off specchio con EF 600 mm f/4 o inf.)

Informazioni sul mirino
Informazioni AF: punti AF, luce conferma messa a fuoco
Informazioni esposizione: velocità otturatore, valore apertura, sensibilità ISO (sempre visualizzata), blocco AE, livello/compensazione esposizione, cerchio lettura spot, avviso esposizione, AEB
Informazioni flash: flash pronto, sinc. alta velocità, blocco FE, compensazione esposizione flash, luce riduzione occhi rossi
Informazioni sull'immagine: priorità toni chiari (D+), scatto monocromatico, velocità di scatto massima (indicazione a 1 cifra), correzione del bilanciamento del bianco, informazioni sulla scheda SD

Anteprima profondità di campo
Sì, assegnata al pulsante SET mediante la funzione C.Fn-8-5

Otturatore oculare
Su cinghia

per i moderatori:
ma questa specie di troll molesto non è ancora stato bandito da questo forum?

48
EOS Bodies / Re: Canon EOS 7D Mark II Spec List [CR2]
« on: February 22, 2013, 05:59:36 AM »
in terms of price, FPS, the 7100 seems more on-par with an x0D than a 7d. Especially if it's a pentamirror VF instead of a pentaprism... which as neuro pointed out, is more xx0 than x0. Higher MP, sure, but that's what Nikon's all about, isn't it? I feel like this doesn't put that much pressure on an upcoming 7d2

of course it is...it costs 1100€

the real question is...the 70D will ba able to compete with this, feature wise or it will be another overpriced camera like 60D?

49
with 5d mk 3 you will need a flash

consider a used 1d mk3 for the upgrade

50
EOS Bodies / Re: Canon Confirms 70D; Future of Semi-Pro DSLR is FF
« on: February 06, 2013, 05:50:40 PM »

That must be why Panasonic is the largest manufacturer of DSLRs, oh wait they're not.

Panasonic is selling their real estate, like sony, to have some cash to continue their business

anyway a great achievement, but i guess the sensors using this need a lot of reworking

51
Third Party Manufacturers / Re: D7000 replacement in April...
« on: February 04, 2013, 04:54:26 PM »
Nikon rumors puts the d7000 replacement for April...
I'm betting that canon will play catchup as we've been seeing of late, and they will be forced to push out whatever pre-prod version of the 7d replacement by May.

What I'm really hoping for though is that Canon doesn't bite, and starts to lead with their own timeline...

7d isnt a competitor of d7000....d7000 will get a new sensor+electronics to maintain the fr

52
No surprise there.  But just want to point out, this is a DxO-like conclusion.  You used a 5DII for the test, I can say from experience that in many situations, the APS-C sensor in my 7D delivered sharper pictures than my 5DII, by virtue of its better AF system.

a lot of people forgot that a camera it's not just a sensor

53
Reviews / Review of Tamron SP 90 Macro VC USD by Lenstip.com
« on: January 14, 2013, 11:41:45 AM »
for thos interested

http://www.lenstip.com/index.php?test=obiektywu&test_ob=361

looks like a very good lens

54
Lenses / Re: Ditch 100L for 70-200 L II ?
« on: December 13, 2012, 03:35:34 PM »
get a sigma 70-200 os for portrait and you will get a greato portrait lens and you will retain the macro one

55
Third Party Manufacturers / Re: Tamron 70-200 f/2.8 Di VC USD Hands-On
« on: December 01, 2012, 03:49:01 PM »
It would be pretty revolutionary for Tamron to step up and try to compete on merit alone without a significant price advantage, too.  In the US they still have the large price advantage, but that doesn't seem to be the case in other markets.

I'm certainly interested in seeing more reviews, however, particularly ones that directly compare the Tamron to some of the big players.

infact the 24-70 vc from tamron costs half the price of the 24-70 ii from canon...and maybe is a better lens in various aspects

third partyies like canon and signa cannot compete with original manufacturers like canon and nikon because peoples prefer to buy "originals" insted of "copies" (tis is the popula belief...tragic)

56
EOS Bodies / Re: 5D MARK III lens recommendation
« on: November 28, 2012, 06:24:31 PM »
Can you recommend lens for 5d mark iii
right now am with 24-105 f/4L

Thinking of below
Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM
Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L II USM
Canon EF 100mm f/2.8L Macro IS USM

Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM good choice...a sigma 70-200 OS is good too for the half of money
Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L II USM ...terrible lens...if you plan to shoot landscapes go for a ts-e
Canon EF 100mm f/2.8L Macro IS USM a sigma 105 OS would fits better




57
EOS Bodies / Re: First Round of EOS 7D Mark II Specs [CR1]
« on: November 26, 2012, 05:39:09 PM »

No more crop sensor for me....bring on the 5D 4 ;D

why not? you could have a decent wide angle lens like sigma 8-16 or tokina 11-16 insted that canon horror you carry in your bag  :'(

58
Third Party Manufacturers / Re: Sigma 35 f/1.4 DG HSM First Impressions
« on: November 26, 2012, 05:36:24 PM »
the new art is minimal and elegant but i will miss the old dark grey EX :)

anyway the latest lenses from sigma are very good

the 70-200 OS, the revamped line of stabilized macros (105-150 and 180) and the new 120-300 are very good quality lenses both optically and costruction wise.

59
Third Party Manufacturers / Re: Sigma 35 f/1.4 DG HSM First Impressions
« on: November 25, 2012, 04:11:38 PM »
gold rings are gone on the new art series style they actually look more like zeiss lenses now

gold ring is for EX lenses...this one despite the good build quality hasnt an EX designation.

maybe sigma dropped the EX deisgnation, but all my EX lenses have a gold ring, like the latest zooms released...120-300 and 50-150

Which part of this is the first lens in the new art series did you not understand? That would be new as in new - not as part of the old EX series  :P

... do they dropped the EX designation? i didnt know, but i hope you are wrong ;)

@twi

sigma started to improve quality (and prices) of their lenses well before the new tamron lenses

60
Third Party Manufacturers / Re: Sigma 35 f/1.4 DG HSM First Impressions
« on: November 25, 2012, 04:24:05 AM »
gold rings are gone on the new art series style they actually look more like zeiss lenses now

gold ring is for EX lenses...this one despite the good build quality hasnt an EX designation.

maybe signa dropped the EX deisgnation, but all my EX lenses have a gold ring, like the latest zooms released...120-300 and 50-150

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 15