January 26, 2015, 03:38:35 PM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - jebrady03

Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 7 ... 18
Lenses / Re: Before you buy your next prime...
« on: May 09, 2014, 03:43:07 PM »
I fell into my GAS solution (that probably sounds dangerous to an outsider)...

I've been looking for a small camera for my wife for YEARS.  I've purchased her 3 cameras and none have the combination of qualities she wants.  Finally, I asked about the SL1... I told her it's the smallest DSLR in the world.  I got it in her hands and SHE LOVES IT!  Now, we "share" all of my lenses and she's pretty excited about it!

I've also been teaching her all about the basics of knowing your gear (aperture, SS, ISO) and this whole process has actually been really good for our marriage as it's giving us a common hobby to REALLY engage in where we didn't have one before other than favorite TV shows.

Oh... and... she's HOT.  I'm a pretty lucky husband :)

EOS Bodies / Re: When Does the Year of the Lens Start?
« on: May 02, 2014, 10:12:51 AM »
Year of the lens huh? Maybe they were just referencing this...


Or maybe we just shouldn't put too much stock into rumors...

EOS Bodies / Re: New Sensor Technology Coming From Canon? [CR1]
« on: April 29, 2014, 09:23:31 AM »
<div name="googleone_share_1" style="position:relative;z-index:5;float: right; /*margin: 70px 0 0 0;*/ top:70px; right:120px; width:0;"><g:plusone size="tall" count="1" href="http://www.canonrumors.com/2014/04/new-sensor-technology-coming-from-canon-cr1/"></g:plusone></div><div style="float: right; margin:0 0 70px 70px;"><a href="https://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-count="vertical" data-url="http://www.canonrumors.com/2014/04/new-sensor-technology-coming-from-canon-cr1/">Tweet</a></div>
<p>We’re told by a new source that a new generation of full-frame CMOS sensors slated for both a forthcoming mirrorless camera as well as updated versions of the current range of prosumer DLSR models.</p>
<p>The new full frame sensors are said to have lower production costs. Yields have improved for these sensors when compared to their predecessors, and that has probably lead to the cost reduction in production. There was also a bit of information about the new sensors having Foveon like technology, we’ve asked for clarification on this.</p>
<p>TALK OF NEW SENSORS, so a big grain of salt for this one is required.</p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">c</span>r</strong></p>

There, fixed it for you! ;-)

Kidding! I, for one, don't have a problem with Canon sensors.

Lenses / Re: Review: Sigma 50mm f/1.4 DG HSM Art Lens
« on: April 22, 2014, 05:03:01 PM »
Several USERS have reported AF inconsistencies with the Sigma 35 Art, I'm one of 'em. In poor lighting I end up with about a 40% hit rate, even using AI Servo and BBF on my 70D. Once the 35mm IS USM hits the refurb store, I'm selling mine. I also won't be purchasing the 50 Art.
Im really disappointed... :-/

Edit: I should note that I never go looking for problems but decided to see if my 35 Art would benefit from MFA 2 nights ago. It needed -5, so that might explain some of the difference between my 60% miss rate and Bryans 40% miss rate.

Edit 2: just checked, it was -3, not -5

EOS-M / Re: Freniac grip ergonomics?
« on: March 15, 2014, 10:11:15 PM »
I didn't really care for it to be honest.  It just wasn't comfortable to me when shooting and I actually preferred the original grip.  Having said that, it did make holding the camera via the grip easier.  But the bigger factor for me was comfort while shooting.

I realize I'm in the SMALL minority with that opinion and if you've used one of his grips before and liked it, I can't see why you wouldn't like the grip for the M.

I don't think the biggest problem is portability, sensor size, in-camera or in-phone effects, connectivity, etc.  I think the biggest problem is "the value of an image".  Most people are so inundated with dozens, hundreds, or even THOUSANDS of pictures a day that at most, a single image is in front of their faces for a fraction of a second.  There's simply no time for the average person to appreciate the uniqueness, subtleties, and nuances of a particular photo - much less the artistic impact it makes (or, could in theory if one were to give it some time).

Sure, top-tier photography will still stand out, even on FB and Instagram, but "the masses" - who in the past may have purchased a dedicated point and shoot or even a low-end DSLR - have a hard time getting out of full-auto mode and capitalizing on the strengths of these cameras to make their images more appealing.  Instead, they'd rather slap an ugly *** filter on top of it to garner the extra fraction of a second it takes from their friends to elicit a "like" before they move on to even more images from others who NEED likes in order to bolster their self-confidence.

PowerShot / Re: PowerShot SX700 HS, PowerShot D30 & Rebel Images
« on: February 11, 2014, 07:36:17 AM »
Safe to say a DPAF sensor ain't in that thing?

I think so!

Moving on along...

PowerShot / Re: More Product Confirmations for CP+
« on: February 10, 2014, 08:02:20 PM »
I'm loving this 'Year of the Lens' so far


24-2000 f/3.7-8.0

A 24-2000 f/3.7-8.0

How can you NOT get excited about THAT?!  lol
 ::) ::) ::) ;D

Photography Technique / Re: Photography fail moments !!!
« on: February 07, 2014, 10:22:47 AM »
Accidentally adjusted the diopter on more than one occasion without realizing it. Can't figure out why the images in the viewfinder look blurry bit AF seems to be working when reviewing the images.

Pricewatch Deals / Re: Canon EOS 70D Deals at B&H Photo
« on: February 03, 2014, 05:00:43 PM »
Odd that this is making the rounds and not the deal that was available on B&H just a few days ago (it was available for several weeks and I'm not sure but might have even been left over from the holidays).  The 70D + 18-135 STM + Pixma Pro 100 + 50 sheets of photo paper + 16 GB class 10 Transcend memory card + Canon camera bag all for $1249 after $400 MIR.  That's $50 less than the current deal for the camera and same lens but you also got a memory card, printer, paper, and a camera bag.
So again, I think it's odd that this deal is getting pointed out.

I'm thinking many of the guys in this forum are not married.

Pretty simple, if your wife wants the 70D, you buy the damn 70D.

Happy wife, happy life.

Lenses / Re: Canon 35 2 IS v Canon 40 2.8 pancake
« on: January 24, 2014, 12:55:21 PM »
To me, it makes sense to ditch the 28 and 40 as the 35mm IS is going to do everything better than either of those and the focal lengths are SO close it doesn't really warrant keeping them.

Having said that, if you think the size of the 40 will come in handy, it's worth it to keep it.  You'll only get $125-140 on the used market (if you're lucky) and while that can certainly help to offset the cost of the new lens, it's certainly not a substantial sum.

As soon as I get the 35mm IS, my plan is to sell the 40 as well.

EOS Bodies / Re: Patent: EF-M 18-40 Pancake
« on: January 19, 2014, 09:17:04 PM »
I think some are missing the point of the M system altogether. I'll spell it out for you...

S M A L L - S I Z E!!!

EOS Bodies / Re: The Next DSLR Will Be Entry Level [CR3]
« on: January 16, 2014, 10:48:15 PM »
How does it get more "entry level" than the 100D?

EOS Bodies / Re: Patent: Microadjustment Automated
« on: January 13, 2014, 04:00:25 AM »
Having 1 value for a lens does not fix much.

I didn't read the patent so I don't know for sure but, does it say it only uses one value?  Or does it say multiple values are not possible?

Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 7 ... 18