July 24, 2014, 04:21:33 PM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - jebrady03

Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7] 8 9 ... 16
91
EOS-M / Re: EOS M2 Shows up in DPP Literature
« on: September 21, 2013, 10:28:33 PM »
Let's be honest.  All three people that wanted an EF-mount mirrorless camera already bought one.

awww... you were almost there. Try a little harder and it might be a tad bit funny.

92
EOS-M / Re: EOS M2 Shows up in DPP Literature
« on: September 21, 2013, 05:30:17 PM »
The M2 is mentioned multiple times in the DPP Help info.  Searching for M2 yields this...


So, it's definitely not a single instance.  It's mentioned all over the place.  Definitely not an accident!
Jonathan

93
EOS Bodies / Re: EOS M Update Information [CR1]
« on: September 19, 2013, 09:41:52 AM »
A "new" 55-200 IS STM was posted for pre-order on Adorama last night?  Is that the same one mentioned in the inital post?  If so, at least half of the rumor is true.

I checked out Adorama's site and didn't see it. Do you have a screen shot or a link?

94
EOS Bodies / Re: New EOS M This Week? [CR1]
« on: September 17, 2013, 07:54:39 PM »
...a previous poster listed one really important add-on for the new M: a tiny flash suitable for fill-flash. This is essential, I think.

Agreed.  But then you'll see mass online grumblings that the flash isn't strong enough! In fact, some of the grumblings may be outright rage with empty threats to switch to Nikon!


95
EOS Bodies / Re: New EOS M This Week? [CR1]
« on: September 17, 2013, 12:53:09 AM »
BTW: who are you using for IR conversion?  I have previously used Camera Clinic in Collingwood to convert an old Powershot G5.


I have not yet converted my M as I'm waiting to have the successor in my hands first but I have saved two links to companies that do it and have had customers posting that they're very happy with the conversion.  Here are those links...

http://www.lifepixel.com/

http://www.kolarivision.com/

Hope that helps!

96
EOS-M / Re: EOS-M or New EF lens?
« on: September 09, 2013, 11:38:07 AM »
the image quality will be equal to or better than your DSLR. I've taken my M on social gatherings at night and people are using their point and shoot or cell phones for pictures and they are having to use flash and I don't and my images are still better. I see that as a huge advantage. Based on the description of your use of the M, it sounds like a good option.

97
EOS-M / Re: EOS-M or New EF lens?
« on: September 09, 2013, 10:44:24 AM »
Many of your questions can be answered by using your T3i in a similar manner and mentally stepping up the results. AF tracking and speed should be better than the T3i using live view. So if you're okay or slightly disappointed with the T3i, you'll be happy with the M. Set your kit lens to 22mm and 4.0 aperture and 2 stops higher ISO than you would normally use in low light and know that your shutter speeds will be equal but the ISO will be much better (2+ stops).  Shoot in live view with the screen turned in and you'll know how well that'll work with the M.

Now personally, I really like the M+22 and find it to be a good low light camera for mostly stationary people at f2.

98
EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: If you plan to upgrade your camera, read
« on: September 07, 2013, 02:20:22 PM »
Most people asking the upgrade question are regular consumer.
They will see zero improvement in IQ from say a T2i to a 7D.

Sure, because it's not like 'regular consumers' have kids that play sports, right?   ::)

Also, not a lot of "regular consumers" on this site.  So, to whom is the original message tailored?

99
EOS-M / Re: The Next EOS M [CR2]
« on: September 06, 2013, 08:09:37 AM »
I just saw the EOS-M with the 18-55 and flash for $299.99 at the local Costco. Now I am even more tempted. I am most likely going to be moving to some sort of mirrorless really soon and have been waiting for Canon to expand their line. I would love the APS-C quality image that I got with the 7D and 60D in the small package for travel.

$300 is about what it would cost to buy just the lens and flash. The camera is nearly free. Even if you decide to upgrade the camera when the next version is available you haven't lost anything.

Checked my local Costco, no such deal unfortunately :(  Not on their website either.

100
EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: IQ comparison; or how meaningful is DXO
« on: September 06, 2013, 12:49:45 AM »

This resolves a long standing question. Canon is better!  ;)

AGREE WHOLEHEARTEDLY!  lol ;)

But seriously, I've always said, and will continue to say, that the photographer > lenses > camera and if a person is iffy about which camera to buy, hold them and play with them.  Very often, ergonomics will decide.  After all, nobody wants to lug around a camera they don't enjoy using.

...and that's how I'm going to let them down easy ;)  lol

Any of the cameras in that test are GREAT choices and anyone who owns them should be VERY satisfied with their choice.

101
EOS Bodies - For Stills / Re: IQ comparison; or how meaningful is DXO
« on: September 06, 2013, 12:19:54 AM »
I shared the first image on facebook and tagged a bunch of my friends and asked them to pick their favorites.  I haven't posted the results yet but so far, the preference for Canon is OVERWHELMING.  The greatest part about it is that the majority of the people I tagged are DIEHARD Nikon shooters who trash Canon every chance they get, and they're picking Canon left and right.  Only one guy split Canon and Nikon down the middle at 3 and 3 (and he's one of the more vocal Canon-haters) and everyone else is at least 2-4 with some being 1-4 (Nikon:Canon).
Crow... it's what's for dinner!

102
EOS-M / Re: The Next EOS M [CR2]
« on: September 03, 2013, 04:13:02 PM »
There's no reason why there can't be a body with a built-in EVF and one without.

If Canon (or Canon USA, at least) is having trouble pushing one model, how will they feel about two?  The other problem I see with that is that I'm afraid the two models will have different sensors - a cheap one (T5i/SL1 sensor, no EVF) and a more expensive one (70D sensor, EVF, and bigger).

I don't think the M system can survive with only one camera model. The implication would be that Canon isn't really serious about this system and Canon needs to start treating it like a system, even if a small one. As for using separate sensors for the two models, I agree with those who believe that the 70D sensor (or a close relative) is the minimum that could reasonably be put into any new M body. If not, why not just keep selling the current M body at the current price (or perhaps $100 higher)? That being said, one thing that has always puzzled me is why Canon went to the expense of revising the firmware in a model that was going to be replaced in a few months.

Just a guess... I don't think the price drop would have been enough to get people to buy into the system, the AF needed to be sped up.

103
Pricewatch Deals / Re: Deals: Canon Lens Price Drops
« on: September 03, 2013, 04:08:43 PM »
Not a bad price on the 17-55.
Are these permanent drops?

104
EOS-M / Re: The Next EOS M [CR2]
« on: September 03, 2013, 01:42:39 PM »
If Canon (or Canon USA, at least) is having trouble pushing one model, how will they feel about two?

Saying this is taking the situation out of context.  You're acting like the 2 models will be comparable to the existing M (one may be and I agree with the rest of your post that a lower spec'd M may retain the 18mp sensor) and that's not even close to the case at hand.

The current M failed initially for 3 main reasons (as you well know); price, AF, lens selection compared to competition.  AF was remedied somewhat (to a very usable degree in my opinion and experience) and the price was slashed big time.  Now the M is selling VERY well - even with the same lens selection and people are VERY happy with what they have in their hands.

A high-spec'd M (DPAF sensor) would be a totally different animal and if Canon announces the M with 2-3 lenses (11-22, 50-ish prime, and telephoto zoom) then it's not even fair to compare the situations.  There will be WAY too many variables that are different and if people can't grasp that then... well...  Sounds like a mental deficiency to me.

105
EOS-M / Re: The Next EOS M [CR2]
« on: September 03, 2013, 08:52:47 AM »
I hope it has full frame and an optical viewfinder and takes EF lenses natively.


I don't. I don't and I don't.

But I just wanted to be the first to say it.

Feel better now? Fine. Now I'll be the first to say: Pancakes, pancakes, pancakes!

At the very least, give us a forty in an M mount please. Is that asking too much?

+1 pancakes pancakes pancakes.


+2!

LOVE the size and weight of the M plus 22.  I'd love to get a few more native pancakes.  For now, I'm really enjoying using it plus the 40 STM via adapter.  I could see me buying one or two more pancakes (depending on the FL) as well as an "occasional use" telephoto zoom and probably the 11-22 and just ditching my 60D and lenses and buying a 6D or 6D2 depending on the timing.  One for really important pics, the other for casual use.

Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7] 8 9 ... 16