April 20, 2014, 08:28:56 PM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - jebrady03

Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7] 8 9 ... 14
91
EOS-M / Re: Some EOS M Information [CR1]
« on: August 19, 2013, 04:18:35 PM »
Still waiting for the 11-22, yawn...

Order it from Canada.

92
EOS-M / Re: Some EOS M Information [CR1]
« on: August 19, 2013, 04:10:03 PM »
The 11-22 isn't released YET. Doesn't mean the M is being abandoned. To think like that is irrational hysteria.

IMO, too many people who have never overcome adversity are talking too loudly about the M system. Success rarely comes without significant and numerous failures. Good business people know that.

93
EOS Bodies / Re: More Medium Format Talk
« on: August 19, 2013, 09:42:51 AM »
The goal with product development is to have a “show stealing” announcement for Photokina 2014.

And the goal of rumoring it now is to steal the show from the "show stealing" announcement!  lol

94
Technical Support / Re: White balance, how to determine?
« on: August 14, 2013, 09:27:47 AM »
somewhat related - does anyone know how to determine what color temperature was selected when using auto white balance?  I'm using DPP and the "info" window doesn't reveal it.
Thanks!

95
Software & Accessories / Re: Image processor, noise, JPG vs RAW via DPP
« on: August 05, 2013, 08:18:50 PM »
Try posting in a less obscure forum topic, such as "EOS bodies".

Tried to stick it in the most appropriate subforum...  :-\

MSP - It'll take me a little while to get to that - was planning to do so but figured someone might know the answer and could save me some time.

Thanks!

96
Software & Accessories / Re: Image processor, noise, JPG vs RAW via DPP
« on: August 05, 2013, 05:17:23 PM »
Around 130 views and no input?  Any help anyone?

97
Software & Accessories / Image processor, noise, JPG vs RAW via DPP
« on: August 05, 2013, 12:25:46 AM »
I know that newer/better processors result in less noise when using the same sensor (T3i vs T4i for instance) for JPG shots but what I'm curious to know is - should I get the same results when I take a picture in RAW and process via DPP vs in-camera JPG - WHEN AN EQUAL AMOUNT OF PROCESSING IS APPLIED?

Thanks for any insight!

98
EOS Bodies / Re: EOS 7D Mark II Information [CR2]
« on: August 04, 2013, 07:29:17 AM »
As a 60D user now, I was disappointed with the 70D revelation of no improvement in RAW.  I was hoping that the 7D would use a different sensor in which the main appeal was IQ improvement.  Basically, one camera's claim to fame was an improvement in usability via the screen (70D) and the other's claim to fame was an improvement in output.  To me, that would give potential buyers a clear path to upgrade.

It seems the 6D may be in my future instead...

99
This thread views like a "who's who" of my ex girlfriends.  :P
Seriously though, great work!

Should be easy enough to dial in the white balance in post, right?


100
EOS-M / Re: EF-M to EF Adapter Now Special Order
« on: July 19, 2013, 11:21:56 PM »
Bought the 22mm kit and ordered a white box grey market adapter for $90 from Hong Kong.  The adapter will be mounted to the 40mm STM when we take it out.  That gives me two focal length options to choose from, both with great IQ.  If I need more than these options provide, I have my DSLR!  For me, the adapter was integral to the purpose of the M.

101
EOS-M / Re: 2.0.2 firmware and third-party batteries
« on: July 19, 2013, 05:35:23 AM »
Not many threads out there about replacement batteries, but still no sense in starting another...

I'm considering an additional battery for my soon to arrive M and like others I'm curious about generic batteries, the mAh, product life, and safety.

Mt Spokane brings up some interesting points (not a surprise) that I wanted to follow up on. It sounds as though you're advocating for either an OEM battery or possibly a third party battery with OEM specs (if such a thing exists). Would you consider the two on par?

What's your recommendation for someone who will rarely need a backup battery?

Thanks!

102
EOS-M / No surprise: EOS M is Amazon top seller
« on: July 18, 2013, 03:19:41 AM »
The EOS M now occupies the number 3 and 9 spots on their best seller list for digital cameras (22mm kit and 18-55mm kit respectively).  The list is updated hourly so by the time you click on the link it could of course, be different.  Here's the list: http://www.amazon.com/Best-Sellers-Electronics-Digital-Cameras/zgbs/electronics/281052

As I said in the subject, it's no surprise.  The value you get for your $300-350 is unmatched!  What I do find interesting is that it says the 22mm kit has been in the top 100 for 34 days - well before the $300 price tag.  The 18-55mm kit has only been in the top 100 for 17 days which aligns with the discounted price.

103
EOS-M / Re: Share your thoughts - M pricing
« on: July 17, 2013, 06:27:37 AM »
I just snagged the adapter (white box from Hong Kong and it already shipped) for $90 so I think I'll be good with that for a while as I also have the 40mm STM and that will keep the overall size down and provide great IQ. I figure I'll just keep the adapter mated to the 40mm and have a two lens tiny carry around kit for when the DSLR is less than practical.

Thanks everyone for the feedback!

104
EOS-M / Re: ebay EOS M adapters?
« on: July 16, 2013, 05:44:28 PM »
I paid 101.95 on Ebay (just a little more) cause of the promised shipping dates.  Could have found for a bit less but not much and it would take longer to get to me.

That link probably goes to the same seller. Ships one day after payment is received, right? Clicking on "make offer" allows you to get it for less.

105
EOS-M / Re: ebay EOS M adapters?
« on: July 16, 2013, 03:34:31 PM »
If anyone is interested, I just bought the adapter from Hong Kong here: http://www.ebay.com/itm/New-Genuine-Canon-EF-EOS-M-Mount-Adapter-Ring-for-EF-Lens-With-Front-Rear-Caps-/111109348420?pt=US_Lens_Adapters_Mounts_Tubes&hash=item19dea21c44

If you click "Make Offer" you can get it for even less.  I tried $75 and was instantly rejected, then $85 and was instantly rejected, $90 was instantly accepted.  The thing is, you AGREE TO BUY IT if you submit an offer and it's accepted so be ready to pony up if you try this.

Just thought I'd throw it out there...

Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7] 8 9 ... 14